Literature DB >> 20571809

[Mobile intraocular pressure measurement. From palpation to initial clinical experience with the handheld dynamic contour tonometer].

U Schmid1, C Kniestedt.   

Abstract

Goldmann applanation tonometry is still the gold standard of intraocular pressure measurement (IOP) and an essential part in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Applanation tonometry is usually performed on a sitting patient at the slit lamp. However, under certain circumstances it is necessary to measure the IOP outside the office setting. With handheld devices the measuring procedure is brought to bedside and surgery theatres, as well as to patients who are not able to sit behind the slit lamp. The dynamic contour tonometer (DCT) represents a new method of direct IOP measurement. Its physical principle is based on piezo-electronic contour matching tonometry and is claimed to be less dependent on biochemical properties of the cornea. Besides the IOP, the ocular pulse amplitude can also be measured. Until now, the DCT had been available as a slit lamp mounted device. In this report, we present a portable prototype of the device. In comparison with the Perkins tonometer and the TONO-PEN XL, the handheld DCT shows smaller intra- and inter-examiner variability. Additionally, the device offers the unique possibility to display the ocular pulse amplitude while the patient is in a horizontal position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20571809     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-010-2175-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  26 in total

1.  [Comparison of precision of the TonoPenXL with the Goldmann and Draeger applanation tonometer in a sitting and recumbent position of the patients -- a clinical study on 251 eyes].

Authors:  Arne Viestenz; Berthold Lausen; Anselm M Jünemann; Christian Y Mardin
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 0.700

2.  Tonometry comparison: Goldmann versus Tono-Pen.

Authors:  K S Kooner; J C Cooksey; J B Barron; T J Zimmerman; R K Gupte; J L Wall
Journal:  Ann Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-01

Review 3.  [Dynamic contour tonometry].

Authors:  C Kniestedt; H E Kanngiesser
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  [Reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry. Comparison with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study on 323 normal eyes].

Authors:  A Viestenz; A Langenbucher; A Viestenz
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.700

Review 5.  Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach.

Authors:  M J Doughty; M L Zaman
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.048

6.  Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude comparisons in different types of glaucoma using dynamic contour tonometry.

Authors:  Omar S Punjabi; Hoai-Ky V Ho; Christoph Kniestedt; Alan G Bostrom; Robert L Stamper; Shan C Lin
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.424

7.  Principle and clinical application of a portable applanation tonometer.

Authors:  J Draeger
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1967-04

8.  Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry.

Authors:  Jose M Martinez-de-la-Casa; Julian Garcia-Feijoo; Eva Vico; Ana Fernandez-Vidal; Jose M Benitez del Castillo; Mohamed Wasfi; J Garcia-Sanchez
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.

Authors:  Brian A Francis; Amy Hsieh; Mei-Ying Lai; Vikas Chopra; Fernando Pena; Stanley Azen; Rohit Varma
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Changes in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  K M Rashad; A A Bahnassy
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Portable hardware & software technologies for addressing ophthalmic health disparities: A systematic review.

Authors:  Margarita Labkovich; Megan Paul; Eliott Kim; Randal A Serafini; Shreyas Lakhtakia; Aly A Valliani; Andrew J Warburton; Aashay Patel; Davis Zhou; Bonnie Sklar; James Chelnis; Ebrahim Elahi
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-05-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.