Literature DB >> 2868172

Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

J M Bland, D G Altman.   

Abstract

In clinical measurement comparison of a new measurement technique with an established one is often needed to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old. Such investigations are often analysed inappropriately, notably by using correlation coefficients. The use of correlation is misleading. An alternative approach, based on graphical techniques and simple calculations, is described, together with the relation between this analysis and the assessment of repeatability.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2868172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  2000 in total

1.  Lipoprotein (a) metabolism estimated by nonsteady-state kinetics.

Authors:  K G Parhofer; T Demant; M M Ritter; H C Geiss; M Donner; P Schwandt
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.880

2.  Assessment of the mechanical properties of coronary arteries using intravascular ultrasound: an in vivo study.

Authors:  M J Williams; R A Stewart; C J Low; G T Wilkins
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-08

3.  Evaluation of noninvasive blood pressure recording by photoplethysmography in clinical studies using angiotensin challenges.

Authors:  T Buclin; C Buchwalder-Csajka; H R Brunner; J Biollaz
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Bone age assessment: a large scale comparison of the Greulich and Pyle, and Tanner and Whitehouse (TW2) methods.

Authors:  R K Bull; P D Edwards; P M Kemp; S Fry; I A Hughes
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Reliability of ratings of perceived exertion during progressive treadmill exercise.

Authors:  K L Lamb; R G Eston; D Corns
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Low hepatic iron concentration: evaluation of two complementary methods, colorimetric assay and iron histological scoring.

Authors:  F Imbert-Bismut; F Charlotte; B Turlin; L Khalil; A Piton; P Brissot; Y Le Charpentier; J Delattre; P Opolon; Y Deugnier; T Poynard
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Left atrial volumes assessed by three- and two-dimensional echocardiography compared to MRI estimates.

Authors:  O Rodevan; R Bjornerheim; M Ljosland; J Maehle; H J Smith; H Ihlen
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-10

8.  Validation of an accurate method for three-dimensional reconstruction and quantitative assessment of volumes, lengths and diameters of coronary vascular branches and segments from biplane angiographic projections.

Authors:  E Wellnhofer; A Wahle; I Mugaragu; J Gross; H Oswald; E Fleck
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-10

9.  Comparison of the Goldmann-Weekers dark adaptometer and LKC Technologies Scotopic Sensitivity tester-1.

Authors:  A Y Peters; K G Locke; D G Birch
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings.

Authors:  N Feltgen; D Leifert; J Funk
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.