Literature DB >> 33008932

Performance Evaluation of the uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanner Based on NEMA NU 2-2018 with Additional Tests to Characterize PET Scanners with a Long Axial Field of View.

Benjamin A Spencer1,2, Eric Berg3, Jeffrey P Schmall4, Negar Omidvari3, Edwin K Leung3, Yasser G Abdelhafez2, Songsong Tang5, Zilin Deng5, Yun Dong5, Yang Lv5, Jun Bao5, Weiping Liu5, Hongdi Li4, Terry Jones2, Ramsey D Badawi3,2, Simon R Cherry3,2.   

Abstract

The world's first total-body PET scanner with an axial field of view (AFOV) of 194 cm is now in clinical and research use at our institution. The uEXPLORER PET/CT system is the first commercially available total-body PET scanner. Here we present a detailed physical characterization of this scanner based on National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 2-2018 along with a new set of measurements devised to appropriately characterize the total-body AFOV.
Methods: Sensitivity, count-rate performance, time-of-flight resolution, spatial resolution, and image quality were evaluated following the NEMA NU 2-2018 protocol. Additional measurements of sensitivity and count-rate capabilities more representative of total-body imaging were performed using extended-geometry phantoms based on the world-average human height (∼165 cm). Lastly, image quality throughout the long AFOV was assessed with the NEMA image quality (IQ) phantom imaged at 5 axial positions and over a range of expected total-body PET imaging conditions (low dose, delayed imaging, short scan duration).
Results: Our performance evaluation demonstrated that the scanner provides a very high sensitivity of 174 kcps/MBq, a count-rate performance with a peak noise-equivalent count rate of approximately 2 Mcps for total-body imaging, and good spatial resolution capabilities for human imaging (≤3.0 mm in full width at half maximum near the center of the AFOV). Excellent IQ, excellent contrast recovery, and low noise properties were illustrated across the AFOV in both NEMA IQ phantom evaluations and human imaging examples.
Conclusion: In addition to standard NEMA NU 2-2018 characterization, a new set of measurements based on extending NEMA NU 2-2018 phantoms and experiments was devised to characterize the physical performance of the first total-body PET system. The rationale for these extended measurements was evident from differences in sensitivity, count-rate-activity relationships, and noise-equivalent count-rate limits imposed by differences in dead time and randoms fraction between the NEMA NU 2 70-cm phantoms and the more representative total-body imaging phantoms. Overall, the uEXPLORER PET system provides ultra-high sensitivity that supports excellent spatial resolution and IQ throughout the field of view in both phantom and human imaging.
© 2021 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EXPLORER; PET; performance evaluation; total-body imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33008932      PMCID: PMC8729871          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.250597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  22 in total

1.  Performance evaluation of the Ingenuity TF PET/CT scanner with a focus on high count-rate conditions.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kolthammer; Kuan-Hao Su; Anu Grover; Manoj Narayanan; David W Jordan; Raymond F Muzic
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Studies of a Next-Generation Silicon-Photomultiplier-Based Time-of-Flight PET/CT System.

Authors:  David F C Hsu; Ezgi Ilan; William T Peterson; Jorge Uribe; Mark Lubberink; Craig S Levin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Performance Evaluation of the Vereos PET/CT System According to the NEMA NU2-2012 Standard.

Authors:  Ivo Rausch; Agustin Ruiz; Itziar Valverde-Pascual; Jacobo Cal-González; Thomas Beyer; Ignasi Carrio
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Effective count rates for PET scanners with reduced and extended axial field of view.

Authors:  L R MacDonald; R L Harrison; A M Alessio; W C J Hunter; T K Lewellen; P E Kinahan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  NEMA NU 2-2012 performance studies for the SiPM-based ToF-PET component of the GE SIGNA PET/MR system.

Authors:  Alexander M Grant; Timothy W Deller; Mohammad Mehdi Khalighi; Sri Harsha Maramraju; Gaspar Delso; Craig S Levin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Quantitative image reconstruction for total-body PET imaging using the 2-meter long EXPLORER scanner.

Authors:  Xuezhu Zhang; Jian Zhou; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Total-body imaging: Transforming the role of positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi; Joel S Karp; William W Moses; Pat Price; Terry Jones
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 17.956

8.  PennPET Explorer: Design and Preliminary Performance of a Whole-Body Imager.

Authors:  Joel S Karp; Varsha Viswanath; Michael J Geagan; Gerd Muehllehner; Austin R Pantel; Michael J Parma; Amy E Perkins; Jeffrey P Schmall; Matthew E Werner; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 11.082

9.  PennPET Explorer: Human Imaging on a Whole-Body Imager.

Authors:  Austin R Pantel; Varsha Viswanath; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Jacob G Dubroff; Gerd Muehllehner; Michael J Parma; Daniel A Pryma; Erin K Schubert; David A Mankoff; Joel S Karp
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 11.082

10.  Subsecond total-body imaging using ultrasensitive positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Xuezhu Zhang; Simon R Cherry; Zhaoheng Xie; Hongcheng Shi; Ramsey D Badawi; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  29 in total

1.  Dynamic PET imaging with ultra-low-activity of 18F-FDG: unleashing the potential of total-body PET.

Authors:  Xiaoli Lan; Kevin Fan; Ke Li; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Expert consensus on oncological [18F]FDG total-body PET/CT imaging (version 1).

Authors:  Haojun Yu; Yushen Gu; Wei Fan; Yongju Gao; Meiyun Wang; Xiaohua Zhu; Zhifang Wu; Jianjun Liu; Biao Li; Hubing Wu; Zhaoping Cheng; Shuxia Wang; Yiqiu Zhang; Baixuan Xu; Sijin Li; Hongcheng Shi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Quantitative evaluation of a deep learning-based framework to generate whole-body attenuation maps using LSO background radiation in long axial FOV PET scanners.

Authors:  Hasan Sari; Mohammadreza Teimoorisichani; Clemens Mingels; Ian Alberts; Vladimir Panin; Deepak Bharkhada; Song Xue; George Prenosil; Kuangyu Shi; Maurizio Conti; Axel Rominger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Quantitative accuracy in total-body imaging using the uEXPLORER PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  Edwin K Leung; Eric Berg; Negar Omidvari; Benjamin A Spencer; Elizabeth Li; Yasser G Abdelhafez; Jeffrey P Schmall; Weiping Liu; Liuchun He; Songsong Tang; Yilin Liu; Yun Dong; Terry Jones; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 4.174

5.  The potential of a medium-cost long axial FOV PET system for nuclear medicine departments.

Authors:  Stefaan Vandenberghe; Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Maya Abi Akl; Jens Maebe; Suleman Surti; Rudi A Dierckx; Daniel A Pryma; Sadek A Nehmeh; Othmane Bouhali; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Relating18F-FDG image signal-to-noise ratio to time-of-flight noise-equivalent count rate in total-body PET using the uEXPLORER scanner.

Authors:  Edwin K Leung; Yasser G Abdelhafez; Eric Berg; Zhaoheng Xie; Xuezhu Zhang; Reimund Bayerlein; Benjamin Spencer; Elizabeth Li; Negar Omidvari; Aaron Selfridge; Simon R Cherry; Jinyi Qi; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.174

7.  Optimizing acquisition times for total-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography with half-dose 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in oncology patients.

Authors:  Yibo He; Yushen Gu; Haojun Yu; Bing Wu; Siyang Wang; Hui Tan; Yanyan Cao; Shuguang Chen; Xiuli Sui; Yiqiu Zhang; Hongcheng Shi
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-07-08

Review 8.  Pitfalls on PET/CT Due to Artifacts and Instrumentation.

Authors:  Yu-Jung Tsai; Chi Liu
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.446

9.  In Vivo Imaging and Gene Therapy: Monitoring Safety, Biodistribution, and Long-Term Expression with Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Alice F Tarantal
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 5.695

Review 10.  Total-Body PET Kinetic Modeling and Potential Opportunities Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Yiran Wang; Elizabeth Li; Simon R Cherry; Guobao Wang
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2021-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.