Literature DB >> 34544074

Quantitative accuracy in total-body imaging using the uEXPLORER PET/CT scanner.

Edwin K Leung1,2, Eric Berg2, Negar Omidvari2, Benjamin A Spencer1, Elizabeth Li2, Yasser G Abdelhafez1, Jeffrey P Schmall3, Weiping Liu4, Liuchun He4, Songsong Tang4, Yilin Liu4, Yun Dong4, Terry Jones1, Simon R Cherry1,2, Ramsey D Badawi1,2.   

Abstract

Absolute quantification of regional tissue concentration of radioactivity in positron emission tomography (PET) is a critical parameter-of-interest across various clinical and research applications and is affected by a complex interplay of factors including scanner calibration, data corrections, and image reconstruction. The emergence of long axial field-of-view (FOV) PET systems widens the dynamic range accessible to PET and creates new opportunities in reducing scan time and radiation dose, delayed or low radioactivity imaging, as well as kinetic modeling of the entire human. However, these imaging regimes impose challenging conditions for accurate quantification due to constraints from image reconstruction, low count conditions, as well as large and rapidly changing radioactivity distribution across a large axial FOV. We comprehensively evaluated the quantitative accuracy of the uEXPLORER total-body scanner in conditions that encompass existing and potential imaging applications (such as dynamic imaging and ultralow-dose imaging) using a set of total-body specific phantom and human measurements. Through these evaluations we demonstrated a relative count rate accuracy of ±3%-4% using the NEMA NU 2-2018 protocol, an axial uniformity spread of ±3% across the central 90% axial FOV, and a 3% activity bias spread from 17 to 474 MBq18F-FDG in a 210 cm long cylindrical phantom. Region-of-interest quantification spread of 1% was found by simultaneously scanning three NEMA NU 2 image quality phantoms, as well as relatively stable volume-of-interest quantification across 0.2%-100% of total counts through re-sampled datasets. In addition, an activity bias spread of -2% to +1% post-bolus injections in human subjects was found. Larger bias changes during the bolus injection phase in humans indicated the difficulty in providing accurate PET data corrections for complex activity distributions across a large dynamic range. Our results overall indicated that the quantitative performance achieved with the uEXPLORER scanner was uniform across the axial FOV and provided the accuracy necessary to support a wide range of imaging applications.
© 2021 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EXPLORER; PET; quantification; total-body

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34544074      PMCID: PMC8585520          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac287c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   4.174


  25 in total

1.  Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  B W Jakoby; Y Bercier; M Conti; M E Casey; B Bendriem; D W Townsend
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Ultra-low-activity total-body dynamic PET imaging allows equal performance to full-activity PET imaging for investigating kinetic metrics of 18F-FDG in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Guobing Liu; Pengcheng Hu; Haojun Yu; Hui Tan; Yiqiu Zhang; Hongyan Yin; Yan Hu; Jianying Gu; Hongcheng Shi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Performance Evaluation of the Vereos PET/CT System According to the NEMA NU2-2012 Standard.

Authors:  Ivo Rausch; Agustin Ruiz; Itziar Valverde-Pascual; Jacobo Cal-González; Thomas Beyer; Ignasi Carrio
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Evaluation of bias and variance in low-count OSEM list mode reconstruction.

Authors:  Y Jian; B Planeta; R E Carson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Accuracy of 3-dimensional reconstruction algorithms for the high-resolution research tomograph.

Authors:  Floris H P van Velden; Reina W Kloet; Bart N M van Berckel; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Heather Jacene; Yvette Kasamon; Martin A Lodge
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Total-Body Quantitative Parametric Imaging of Early Kinetics of 18F-FDG.

Authors:  Tao Feng; Yizhang Zhao; Hongcheng Shi; Hongdi Li; Xuezhu Zhang; Guobao Wang; Patricia M Price; Ramsey D Badawi; Simon R Cherry; Terry Jones
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Measurement of PET Quantitative Bias In Vivo.

Authors:  Martin A Lodge; Wojciech Lesniak; Michael A Gorin; Kenneth J Pienta; Steven P Rowe; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Subsecond total-body imaging using ultrasensitive positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Xuezhu Zhang; Simon R Cherry; Zhaoheng Xie; Hongcheng Shi; Ramsey D Badawi; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  6 in total

1.  Relating18F-FDG image signal-to-noise ratio to time-of-flight noise-equivalent count rate in total-body PET using the uEXPLORER scanner.

Authors:  Edwin K Leung; Yasser G Abdelhafez; Eric Berg; Zhaoheng Xie; Xuezhu Zhang; Reimund Bayerlein; Benjamin Spencer; Elizabeth Li; Negar Omidvari; Aaron Selfridge; Simon R Cherry; Jinyi Qi; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.174

2.  Efficient Delay Correction for Total-Body PET Kinetic Modeling Using Pulse Timing Methods.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Li; Benjamin A Spencer; Jeffrey P Schmall; Yasser Abdelhafez; Ramsey D Badawi; Guobao Wang; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 11.082

3.  Radioembolization Dosimetry with Total-Body 90Y PET.

Authors:  Gustavo Costa; Benjamin Spencer; Negar Omidvari; Cameron Foster; Michael Rusnak; Heather Hunt; Denise T Caudle; Rex T Pillai; Catherine Tram Vu; Emilie Roncali
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 11.082

Review 4.  Total-body PET/CT - First Clinical Experiences and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Quinn Kwan-Tai Ng; Elizabeth Katherine Anna Triumbari; Negar Omidvari; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi; Lorenzo Nardo
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 4.802

Review 5.  Clinical Applications of Immuno-PET in Lymphoma: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Katherine Anna Triumbari; David Morland; Riccardo Laudicella; Matteo Bauckneht; Domenico Albano; Salvatore Annunziata
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Lutetium background radiation in total-body PET-A simulation study on opportunities and challenges in PET attenuation correction.

Authors:  Negar Omidvari; Li Cheng; Edwin K Leung; Yasser G Abdelhafez; Ramsey D Badawi; Tianyu Ma; Jinyi Qi; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Front Nucl Med       Date:  2022-08-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.