Literature DB >> 24955921

Performance evaluation of the Ingenuity TF PET/CT scanner with a focus on high count-rate conditions.

Jeffrey A Kolthammer1, Kuan-Hao Su, Anu Grover, Manoj Narayanan, David W Jordan, Raymond F Muzic.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the positron emission tomography (PET) imaging performance of the Ingenuity TF 128 PET/computed tomography (CT) scanner which has a PET component that was designed to support a wider radioactivity range than is possible with those of Gemini TF PET/CT and Ingenuity TF PET/MR. Spatial resolution, sensitivity, count rate characteristics and image quality were evaluated according to the NEMA NU 2-2007 standard and ACR phantom accreditation procedures; these were supplemented by additional measurements intended to characterize the system under conditions that would be encountered during quantitative cardiac imaging with (82)Rb. Image quality was evaluated using a hot spheres phantom, and various contrast recovery and noise measurements were made from replicated images. Timing and energy resolution, dead time, and the linearity of the image activity concentration, were all measured over a wide range of count rates. Spatial resolution (4.8-5.1 mm FWHM), sensitivity (7.3 cps kBq(-1)), peak noise-equivalent count rate (124 kcps), and peak trues rate (365 kcps) were similar to those of the Gemini TF PET/CT. Contrast recovery was higher with a 2 mm, body-detail reconstruction than with a 4 mm, body reconstruction, although the precision was reduced. The noise equivalent count rate peak was broad (within 10% of peak from 241-609 MBq). The activity measured in phantom images was within 10% of the true activity for count rates up to those observed in (82)Rb cardiac PET studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24955921      PMCID: PMC4457340          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/14/3843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  14 in total

1.  PET performance measurements using the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard.

Authors:  Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Joel S Karp; Michael E Casey; Frank P DiFilippo; Horace Hines; Gerd Muehllehner; Vilim Simcic; Charles W Stearns; Lars-Eric Adam; Steve Kohlmyer; Vesna Sossi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Need for standardization of 18F-FDG PET/CT for treatment response assessments.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  ACR accreditation of nuclear medicine and PET imaging departments.

Authors:  Carolyn Richards MacFarlane
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2006-03

4.  Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 7. A technique to reduce noise in accidental coincidence measurements and coincidence efficiency calibration.

Authors:  M E Casey; E J Hoffman
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Sampling requirements for dynamic cardiac PET studies using image-derived input functions.

Authors:  R R Raylman; J M Caraher; G D Hutchins
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities.

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Austin Kuhn; Matthew E Werner; Amy E Perkins; Jeffrey Kolthammer; Joel S Karp
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Quantitative relationship between coronary calcium content and coronary flow reserve as assessed by integrated PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  Zelmira Curillova; Bettina F Yaman; Sharmila Dorbala; Raymond Y Kwong; Arkadius Sitek; Georges El Fakhri; Constantinos Anagnostopoulos; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Analysis of emission tomographic scan data: limitations imposed by resolution and background.

Authors:  R M Kessler; J R Ellis; M Eden
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard; Mike J O'Doherty; Wolfgang A Weber; Felix M Mottaghy; Markus N Lonsdale; Sigrid G Stroobants; Wim J G Oyen; Joerg Kotzerke; Otto S Hoekstra; Jan Pruim; Paul K Marsden; Klaus Tatsch; Corneline J Hoekstra; Eric P Visser; Bertjan Arends; Fred J Verzijlbergen; Josee M Zijlstra; Emile F I Comans; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Anne M Paans; Antoon T Willemsen; Thomas Beyer; Andreas Bockisch; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop; Dominique Delbeke; Richard P Baum; Arturo Chiti; Bernd J Krause
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Qualification of PET scanners for use in multicenter cancer clinical trials: the American College of Radiology Imaging Network experience.

Authors:  Joshua S Scheuermann; Janet R Saffer; Joel S Karp; Anthony M Levering; Barry A Siegel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  Precision and accuracy of clinical quantification of myocardial blood flow by dynamic PET: A technical perspective.

Authors:  Jonathan B Moody; Benjamin C Lee; James R Corbett; Edward P Ficaro; Venkatesh L Murthy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Biodistribution, dosimetry, and temporal signal-to-noise ratio analyses of normal and cancer uptake of [68Ga]Ga-P15-041, a gallium-68 labeled bisphosphonate, from first-in-human studies.

Authors:  Robert K Doot; Anthony J Young; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; David Alexoff; Kyle J Labban; Hwan Lee; Zehui Wu; Zhihao Zha; Seok R Choi; Karl H Ploessl; Erin K Schubert; Hsiaoju Lee; Lin Zhu; Janet S Reddin; Joel S Karp; Hank Kung; Daniel A Pryma
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Repeatability of Quantitative 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT Measurements in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Bernard H E Jansen; Matthijs C F Cysouw; André N Vis; Reindert J A van Moorselaar; Jens Voortman; Yves J L Bodar; Patrick R Schober; N Harry Hendrikse; Otto S Hoekstra; Ronald Boellaard; D E Oprea-Lager
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  The accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in primary lymph node staging in high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Can Öbek; Tünkut Doğanca; Emre Demirci; Meltem Ocak; Ali Rıza Kural; Asıf Yıldırım; Uğur Yücetaş; Çetin Demirdağ; Sarper M Erdoğan; Levent Kabasakal
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-06-18       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Update on latest advances in time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.685

6.  Comparison of maximal Rubidium-82 activities for myocardial blood flow quantification between digital and conventional PET systems.

Authors:  Joris D van Dijk; Pieter L Jager; Jochen A C van Osch; Maryam Khodaverdi; Jorn A van Dalen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Validation of phantom-based harmonization for patient harmonization.

Authors:  Joseph V Panetta; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Numerical observer study of lesion detectability for a long axial field-of-view whole-body PET imager using the PennPET Explorer.

Authors:  Varsha Viswanath; Margaret E Daube Witherspoon; Joel S Karp; Suleman Surti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  Advances in time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.685

10.  Dynamic cardiac PET imaging: Technological improvements advancing future cardiac health.

Authors:  Grant T Gullberg; Uttam M Shrestha; Youngho Seo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.