| Literature DB >> 35609588 |
Edwin K Leung1,2,3, Yasser G Abdelhafez1, Eric Berg2, Zhaoheng Xie2, Xuezhu Zhang2, Reimund Bayerlein1, Benjamin Spencer2, Elizabeth Li2, Negar Omidvari2, Aaron Selfridge1, Simon R Cherry1,2, Jinyi Qi2, Ramsey D Badawi1,2.
Abstract
Objective.This work assessed the relationship between image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and total-body noise-equivalent count rate (NECR)-for both non-time-of-flight (TOF) NECR and TOF-NECR-in a long uniform water cylinder and 14 healthy human subjects using the uEXPLORER total-body PET/CT scanner.Approach.A TOF-NEC expression was modified for list-mode PET data, and both the non-TOF NECR and TOF-NECR were compared using datasets from a long uniform water cylinder and 14 human subjects scanned up to 12 h after radiotracer injection.Main results.The TOF-NECR for the uniform water cylinder was found to be linearly proportional to the TOF-reconstructed image SNR2in the range of radioactivity concentrations studied, but not for non-TOF NECR as indicated by the reducedR2value. The results suggest that the use of TOF-NECR to estimate the count rate performance of TOF-enabled PET systems may be more appropriate for predicting the SNR of TOF-reconstructed images.Significance.Image quality in PET is commonly characterized by image SNR and, correspondingly, the NECR. While the use of NECR for predicting image quality in conventional PET systems is well-studied, the relationship between SNR and NECR has not been examined in detail in long axial field-of-view total-body PET systems, especially for human subjects. Furthermore, the current NEMA NU 2-2018 standard does not account for count rate performance gains due to TOF in the NECR evaluation. The relationship between image SNR and total-body NECR in long axial FOV PET was assessed for the first time using the uEXPLORER total-body PET/CT scanner.Entities:
Keywords: noise-equivalent count rate; time-of-flight; total-body PET
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35609588 PMCID: PMC9275089 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac72f1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Phys Med Biol ISSN: 0031-9155 Impact factor: 4.174