Literature DB >> 34243906

Pitfalls on PET/CT Due to Artifacts and Instrumentation.

Yu-Jung Tsai1, Chi Liu2.   

Abstract

PET/CT has become a preferred imaging modality over PET-only scanners in clinical practice. However, along with the significant improvement in diagnostic accuracy and patient throughput, pitfalls on PET/CT are reported as well. This review provides a general overview on the potential influence of the limitations with respect to PET/CT instrumentation and artifacts associated with the modality integration on the image appearance and quantitative accuracy of PET. Approaches proposed in literature to address the limitations or minimize the artifacts are discussed as well as their current challenges for clinical applications. Although the CT component can play an important role in assisting clinical diagnosis, we concentrate on the imaging scenarios where CT is used to provide auxiliary information for attenuation compensation and scatter correction in PET.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34243906      PMCID: PMC8490278          DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  139 in total

1.  High-resolution PET detector design: modelling components of intrinsic spatial resolution.

Authors:  Jennifer R Stickel; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Optimized intravenous contrast administration for diagnostic whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Thomas Beyer; Gerald Antoch; Andreas Bockisch; Joerg Stattaus
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Benefit of time-of-flight in PET: experimental and clinical results.

Authors:  Joel S Karp; Suleman Surti; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Gerd Muehllehner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Interpolated average CT for cardiac PET/CT attenuation correction.

Authors:  Greta S P Mok; Cobie Y T Ho; Bang-Hung Yang; Tung-Hsin Wu
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Attenuation correction in cardiac PET: To raise awareness for a problem which is as old as PET/CT.

Authors:  Stephan G Nekolla; Axel Martinez-Möller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Effect of patient arm motion in whole-body PET/CT.

Authors:  Martin A Lodge; Joyce C Mhlanga; Steve Y Cho; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Effective methods to correct contrast agent-induced errors in PET quantification in cardiac PET/CT.

Authors:  Florian Büther; Lars Stegger; Mohammad Dawood; Felix Range; Michael Schäfers; Roman Fischbach; Thomas Wichter; Otmar Schober; Klaus P Schäfers
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Impact of point spread function modeling and time-of-flight on myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve measurements for rubidium-82 cardiac PET.

Authors:  Ian S Armstrong; Christine M Tonge; Parthiban Arumugam
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Influences of point-spread function and time-of-flight reconstructions on standardized uptake value of lymph node metastases in FDG-PET.

Authors:  Go Akamatsu; Katsuhiko Mitsumoto; Takafumi Taniguchi; Yuji Tsutsui; Shingo Baba; Masayuki Sasaki
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  CT-based attenuation correction in the calculation of semi-quantitative indices of [18F]FDG uptake in PET.

Authors:  D Visvikis; D C Costa; I Croasdale; A H R Lonn; J Bomanji; S Gacinovic; P J Ell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.