| Literature DB >> 30217010 |
René Benndorf1, Huijuan Guo2, Elisabeth Sommerwerk3, Christiane Weigel4, Maria Garcia-Altares5, Karin Martin6, Haofu Hu7, Michelle Küfner8, Z Wilhelm de Beer9, Michael Poulsen10, Christine Beemelmanns11.
Abstract
The chemical analysis of insect-associated Actinobacteria has attracted the interest of natural product chemists in the past years as bacterial-produced metabolites are sought to be crucial for sustaining and protecting the insect host. The objective of our study was to evaluate the phylogenyEntities:
Keywords: actinobacteria; chemical ecology; drug discovery; secondary metabolites; symbiosis
Year: 2018 PMID: 30217010 PMCID: PMC6165096 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics7030083
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6382
Figure 1Phylogenetic placement Actinobacteria that have previously been reported from fungus-growing termites and isolated natural products: termisoflavone A (1) from Streptomyces sp. RB1, dentigerumycin B (2) from Streptomyces sp. M41, actinomycin D (3) from Streptomyces sp. RB94, natalamycin A (4) from Streptomyces sp. M56, macrotermycin A (5) from Amycolatopsis sp. M39, and rubterolone D (6) from Actinomadura sp. RB29.
Figure 2(A) Royal chamber of Macrotermes natalensis containing the queen, the king, and workers. (B) Fungus comb with a major and a minor soldier. (C) A plate exemplifying the diversity of culturable bacteria that can be isolated from the gut of a fungus-growing termite worker.
The number of Actinobacteria isolated within this study and by Visser et al. [17], and their origin of isolation by genera and family.
| Genus | Family | This Study: | Visser et al. [ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Termite Gut | Termite Exoskeleton | Fungus Comb | Termite Exoskeleton | Fungus Comb | ||
|
| Streptomycetaceae | 46 | 14 | 13 | 13 | 2 |
|
| Streptomycetaceae | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
|
| Thermomonosporaceae | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
|
| Microbacteriaceae | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| Microbacteriaceae | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| Micrococcaceae | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| Micromonosporaceae | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
|
| Nocardiaceae | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| Nocardioidaceae | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| Promicromonosporaceae | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| Mycobacteriaceae | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| Streptosporangiaceae | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| Streptosporangiaceae | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| family of order | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Figure 3Phylogeny and antimicrobial activity of newly isolated Actinobacteria: (A) Phylogenetic analysis based on near full-length 16S rRNA sequences of isolated Actinobacteria including phylogenetic placement to the family level. An unrooted neighbor-joining distance tree is shown with branch values indicating bootstrap support (>50 are given) of 1000 pseudoreplicates, tree was constructed with Mega 7.0 and edited with iTOL v3. Middle: Origin of isolation: termite abdomen: black box, termite gut: brown circle, fungus comb: green star. Right: activity heatmap against test strains Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633 (1), Staphylococcus aureus IMET 10760 (2), Escherichia coli SG 458 (3), Pseudomonas aeruginosa K799/61 (4), Mycobacterium vaccae IMET 10670 (5), Sporobolomyces salmonicolor SBUG 549 (6), Candida albicans BMSY 212 (7) and Penicillium notatum JP36 (8). Representative picture of (B) fungus comb, (C) major worker, (D) dissected gut of major worker.
Figure 4Rooted neighbor-joining tree based on near-complete 16S rRNA gene sequences showing relationship between putative new Actinobacteria strains (based on 98.65% similarity threshold) and closest relatives. Stars (*) indicate branches that were also recovered in maximum-likelihood tree. Only bootstrap values above 50% (based on 1000 pseudoreplicates) are shown. Rubrobacter xylanophilus was used as an outgroup. The scale bar indicates 0.02 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Figure 5Phylogeny and antifungal activity of isolated Actinobacteria. Left: Phylogenetic analysis based on near full-length 16S rRNA sequences of isolated Actinobacteria. An unrooted maximum-likelihood distance tree is shown with branch values indicating bootstrap support (>50 are given) of 1000 pseudoreplicates; tree was constructed with Mega 7.0 and edited with iTOL v3. Right: Antifungal activity assays of 37 different culture extracts against ecologically relevant fungi: #1: Cladosporium sp., #2: Cladosporium sp., #4: Pleosporales sp., #5: Fusarium sp., #8: Coriolopsis sp., #10: Fusarium sp., #12: Cunninghamella sp., #13: Cladosporium sp., #15: Alternaria sp., #17: Trichoderma sp., #22: Trichoderma sp., #24: Hypocrea sp., T115: Termitomyces sp., T112: Termitomyces sp., T153: Termitomyces sp., P5: Termitomyces sp., MA: Metarhizium anisopliae ATCC 24942, and BB: Beauveria bassiana ST 17960.
Figure 6Co-cultivation studies of strain RB108 with Pleosporales sp. #4: (A) negative control: axenic Pleosporales sp. #4; (B) positive control: Pleosporales sp. #4 in the presence of amphotericin B (8 mg/mL, middle); (C) interaction assay of Streptomyces sp. RB108 (middle) with Pleosporales sp. #4 (edge of the plate); (D) axenic Streptomyces sp. RB108; (E) structure of barceloneic acid A (7); and representative UHPLC-MS analysis (254 nm) of zone of inhibition extracts: EIC (–) of barceloneic acid A (7) at m/z 319.0.
Figure 7MALDI imaging of a co-cultivation study of Streptomyces sp. RB108 with Pleosporales sp. #4: (A) average MS spectra of the MALDI Imaging MS analysis (TIC normalization) and red rectangle defines the region of the spectra zoomed in; (B) extended view of the region from 2100 to 2300 m/z showing the upregulated RiPPs; (C) photograph of co-culture set up: RB108 grown in the middle and right lower side; Pleosporales sp. #4 grown on agar plugs on the right and left edge of the plate. Area covered by the MALDI Imaging MS analysis defined in red; (D) visualization of the most intense peak ion m/z 2188.15 (TIC normalization, weak denoising); and (E) visualization of the second most intense peak ion m/z 2134.71 (TIC normalization, weak denoising).
Figure 8Co-cultivation studies of strain RB29 with Trichoderma sp. #22: (A) negative control: axenic Trichoderma sp. #22; (B) positive control: Trichoderma sp. #22 in the presence of AmpB; (C) co-cultivation of Actinomadura sp. RB29 (middle) and Trichoderma sp. #22 (edge of the plate); (D) axenic culture of Actinomadura sp. RB29; (E) Representative UHPLC-MS analysis (535 nm) of zone of inhibition extracts: EIC (+) of rubterolone A, B, and D at m/z 414.1, 496.1, and 554.1 and structures of isolated rubterolone A (8), B (9), and D (6); (F) production of banegasine (10) on ISP2 agar plate and extract with 1% AcOH containing MeOH; and (G) production of cyclo(NMe-L-3,5-dichlorotyrosine-Dhb) (11) in Soya Broth (here represent from XAD16 80% MeOH eluate).
Figure 9Proposed structures of lanthipeptides rubrominin A (12) and B (13).
Media compositions used for initial isolations and subsequent growth assays and large-scale cultivation.
| Medium (Abbreviation) | Content Per L |
|---|---|
| Potato Dextrose Broth (PDB) | 26.5 g potato extract glucose (6.5 g potato extract, 20 g glucose) |
| Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) | 26.5 g potato extract glucose, 20.0 g agar |
| ISP2 Broth | 4.0 g yeast extract, 10.0 g malt extract, 4.0 g glucose |
| ISP2 Agar | 4.0 g yeast extract, 10.0 g malt extract, 4.0 g glucose, 20.0 g agar |
| Chitin Agar | 4.0 g chitin, 0.7 g K2HPO4, 0.3 g KH2PO4, 0.57 g MgSO4·7H2O, 0.01 g FeSO4·7H2O, 0.0018 g ZnSO4·7H2O, 0.0016 g MnCl2·4H2O |
| Minimal Media | 2.0 g Na-acetate, 2.0 g NH4Cl 0.7 g K2HPO4, 0.3 g KH2PO4, 0.57 g MgSO4·7H2O, 0.01 g FeSO4·7H2O, 0.0018 g ZnSO4·7H2O, 0.0016 g MnCl2·4H2O |
| MC Agar | 5.0 g microcrystalline cellulose, 20.0 g agar |
| Soya Broth | 20.0 g soya flour, 20.0 g glucose, 5.0 g NaCl, 3.0 g CaCO3, 0.25 mL desmophen |