| Literature DB >> 31217550 |
Saria Otani1,2, Victoria L Challinor1, Nina B Kreuzenbeck3, Sara Kildgaard1, Søren Krath Christensen1, Louise Lee Munk Larsen4,5, Duur K Aanen6, Silas Anselm Rasmussen7, Christine Beemelmanns3, Michael Poulsen8.
Abstract
Fungus-growing termites engage in an obligate mutualistic relationship with Termitomyces fungi, which they maintain in monocultures on specialised fungus comb structures, without apparent problems with infectious diseases. While other fungi have been reported in the symbiosis, detailed comb fungal community analyses have been lacking. Here we use culture-dependent and -independent methods to characterise fungus comb mycobiotas from three fungus-growing termite species (two genera). Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) gene analyses using 454 pyrosequencing and Illumina MiSeq showed that non-Termitomyces fungi were essentially absent in fungus combs, and that Termitomyces fungal crops are maintained in monocultures as heterokaryons with two or three abundant ITS variants in a single fungal strain. To explore whether the essential absence of other fungi within fungus combs is potentially due to the production of antifungal metabolites by Termitomyces or comb bacteria, we performed in vitro assays and found that both Termitomyces and chemical extracts of fungus comb material can inhibit potential fungal antagonists. Chemical analyses of fungus comb material point to a highly complex metabolome, including compounds with the potential to play roles in mediating these contaminant-free farming conditions in the termite symbiosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31217550 PMCID: PMC6584615 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-45364-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Right. A simplified schematic of the lifecycle of Macrotermes natalensis and Odontotermes sp. and O. cf. badius. In most termite species, Termitomyces spores are acquired from the environment (i) and brought back to incipient colonies, where spores fuse (ii) to form the dikaryotic mycelium characteristic of the growth within fungus combs. Left: Defence modes in farming termites. Termites forage for plant material (iii), which may contain potential antagonists such as Trichoderma or Beauveria (spore structures shown). Before being incorporated into the fungus comb, this plant material passes through the guts of young termite workers (iv). Any potential antagonists that pass through the gut unharmed must be suppressed through for example termite antimicrobial peptides, out-competition by Termitomyces, or antimicrobials of Termitomyces or bacterial origin.
Figure 2Heat maps showing the relative abundances of Termitomyces OTUs that accounted for >1% relative abundance per sample and the four other fungi identified in combs (fungus combs indicated with Od and Mn followed by colony code; pure cultures of Termitomyces indicated with T followed by colony code) in the MiSeq dataset for Odontotermes (left) and M. natalensis (right). The scale is a logarithmic calculation of the taxon read percentage out of the total number of quality-filtered and classified reads per sample.
Figure 3Antimicrobial activity assays and LCMS-PCA of fractionated fungus comb extracts. (a) Mean (±SE; n = 3) zones of inhibition (mm2) of Trichoderma sp. (grey) and Beauveria bassiana (black) when exposed to different concentrations of fractionated fungus comb extracts. Fractions were obtained by SPE eluting with 80% and 100% acetonitrile (ACN) and 100% acetone (ACE). Colonies of origin of fungus combs are indicated at the bottom of each panel. (b) PCA plot (PC1 vs PC2) of LCMS data for fractionated fungus comb extracts from 12 colonies of M. natalensis, Odontotermes sp. and Odontotermes cf. badius. Colonies labelled with colony ID numbers.