| Literature DB >> 26694341 |
Maria-Magdalena Mocanu1, Péter Nagy2, János Szöllősi3,4.
Abstract
The review will discuss in detail the effects of polyphenols on breast cancer, including both the advantages and disadvantages of the applications of these natural compounds. First, we focus on the characterization of the main classes of polyphenols and then on in vitro and in vivo experiments carried out in breast cancer models. Since the therapeutic effects of the administration of a single type of polyphenol might be limited because of the reduced bioavailability of these drugs, investigations on combination of several polyphenols or polyphenols with conventional therapy will also be discussed. In addition, we present recent data focusing on clinical trials with polyphenols and new approaches with nanoparticles in breast cancer. Besides the clinical and translational findings this review systematically summarizes our current knowledge about the molecular mechanisms of anti-cancer effects of polyphenols, which are related to apoptosis, cell cycle regulation, plasma membrane receptors, signaling pathways and epigenetic mechanisms. At the same time the effects of polyphenols on primary tumor, metastasis and angiogenesis in breast cancer are discussed. The increasing enthusiasm regarding the combination of polyphenols and conventional therapy in breast cancer might lead to additional efforts to motivate further research in this field.Entities:
Keywords: apoptosis; breast cancer; cell cycle; polyphenols; prevention; signaling pathways
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26694341 PMCID: PMC6332464 DOI: 10.3390/molecules201219864
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Main classes of flavonoids with chemical structure, representative members and dietary sources [36,39,45,46].
| Class of Flavonoid | Chemical Structure | Representative Members | Dietary Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flavonols | Quercetin Kaempferol Myricetin | Onions ( | |
| Flavones | Apigenin Luteolin | Celery ( | |
| Flavan-3-ols/proto-anthocyanidins | Epicatechin Epigallocatechin Epigallocatechin-3- | Apricots ( | |
| Anthocyanidins/Anthocynins | Cyanidin Pelargonidin Delphinidin Malvidin | Red grapes ( | |
| Flavanones | Naringerin Hesperitin | Orange ( | |
| Isoflavones | Genistein Daidzein Glycitin | Soybean ( | |
The main classes of non-flavonoid polyphenols with chemical structure, representative members and dietary sources [36,39,45].
| Class of Non-Flavonoids | Chemical Structure | Representative Members | Dietary Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phenolic acids—Benzoic acids/hydroxybenzoates C6–C1 | Gallic acid | Clove buds ( | |
| Phenolic acids—Cinnamic acids/hydroxycinnamates C6–C3 | Apples ( | ||
| Stilbenes C6–C2–C6 | Resveratrol | Red wine, peanuts ( | |
| Other polyphenols | Curcumin (a) Rosmarinic acid (b) Gingerol (c) | Turmeric ( |
Figure 1Poyphenols as aromatase inhibitory molecules. (A) Chemical structure of aromatase inhibitors and natural substrates. a. androstenedione (substrate for aromatase); b. exemestane (3rd generation steroidal inhibitor); c. letrozole (3rd generation non-steroidal inhibitor); d. luteolin (flavonoid) [56,57]; (B) Schematic mechanism of activity of aromatase inhibitors in relation to nuclear estrogen receptors. Androgens (androstendione and testosterone) are converted to estrogens (estrone and estradiol) by aromatase; estradiol enters the nucleus and binds to estrogen receptors (ER) which interacts with estrogen response elements (ERE) triggering cell proliferation. So far, luteolin, flavonoid and isoflavonoid derivatives have been found to inhibit aromatase activity in breast cancer cells [64,66,67].
Figure 2Schematic representation of glycolysis, the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), glutaminolysis and lipid synthesis and their inhibition by polyphenols in breast cancer cells. During glycolysis, glucose enters the cell through the glucose transporter (GLUT) and then it is oxidized to pyruvate followed by reduction to lactate. Lactate is released from the cell through the monocarboxylate transporter (MCT). The rate of aerobic glycolysis in cancer cells is increased in detriment of ATP production. The intermediate compounds from the glycolytic pathway are further used to synthetize nucleotides, amino acids and lipids required for the proliferation of cancer cells [72,75,76,80]. The glucose transporter can be inhibited by EGCG, quercetin, phloretin, kaempferol [81,82,83], PFK by resveratrol [84], and MCT by kaempferol [83]. Abbreviations: PEP, phosphoenolyruvate; TCA, tricarboxylic acid cycle; F-2,6-BP, fructose-2,6-biphosphate; α-KG, alpha-ketoglutarate; HK, hexokinase; G6PDH, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; PFK, phosphofructokinase; PHGDH, 3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase; PKM2, pyruvate kinase isoform M2; LDHA, lactate dehydrogenase A; Acetyl CoA, acetyl coenzyme A; ADP, acid adenosine diphosphate; ATP, acid adenosine triphosphate; NADP+, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (oxidized); NADPH, reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; NADH, reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; NAD+, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (oxidized).
Figure 3The effect of polyphenols on cell cycle. Cell cycle phases with (i) stimulatory proteins: cyclin-Cdk complexes and eukaryote transcription factor (E2F) in blue and (ii) inhibitory proteins: retinoblastoma protein (Rb), p15, p16, p21, p27 and p53 in red; phosphorylation of Rb will release E2F which further stimulates cell cycle progression; p53, the tumor suppressor protein is responsible for stimulation of p21 and p27 expression, two inhibitory proteins of the cyclin-Cdk complexes [103,104,105,106,107,108]. Quercetin, resveratrol, curcumin, genisteins and apigenin arrest the cells in G2/M phase, while resveratrol and genistein in S phase; apigenin inhibits Cyclin A, B-Cdk1 complexes, and stimulate p21 and p27; curcumin, apigenin and resveratrol increase the activity of p53 [100,101,102,109,110,111,112,113]. Blue and red lines indicate stimulation and inhibition, respectively, of the process (for the sake of simplicity only the major proteins involved in cell cycle regulation are shown).
Figure 4The effect of polyphenols on apoptotic signaling pathways. Extrinsic (1) and intrinsic (2) apoptosis pathways are shown in the figure. The proteins with pro-apoptotic activity (caspases, Bax, Bak, Bid, Bad, IkB) are colored in blue, while the proteins with anti-apoptotic action (Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, PI3K, Akt, IKK, NF-kB) in red. EGCG, resveratrol, genistein and curcumin can inhibit anti-apoptotic proteins (Bcl-2) and stimulate the pro-apoptotic ones (Bax, Bak); caspases are stimulated by EGCG, quercetin and apigenin; the anti-apoptotic activity of NF-kB can be inhibited by apigenin [115,116,117,118,119,120,121]. Blue and red lines indicate stimulation and inhibition, respectively, of the process (for the sake of simplicity only the major proteins of the apoptosis pathways are shown).
Figure 5Chemical structure of 17β-estradiol and phytoestrogens [134,138].
Figure 6The effect of polyphenols on nuclear ER, HER2 and IGF signaling pathways. Two main mechanisms of E2 action are depicted: (i) genomic activity of nuclear ER in connection with ERE or activating protein-1 (AP-1) transcription factors and (ii) cell surface activity of plasma membrane ER in connection with growth factor receptor signaling pathways [21,139]. Nuclear ER activity might be inhibited by genistein and resveratrol; the expression or phosphorylation of EGFR family can be downregulated by curcumin, resveratrol, quercetin and genistein; ERK phosphorylation can be reduced by curcumin; PI3K activity can be inhibited by EGCG and genistein, while Akt action can be inhibited by EGCG, genistein and apigenin [142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149]. Blue and red lines indicate stimulation and inhibition, respectively (for the sake of simplicity only the major proteins of the signaling pathways were included).
Summary of in vivo experiments: breast cancer and polyphenols.
| Author, Year | Animals | Dose and Duration of Administration | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Murrill W.B. | Pre-pubertal Sprague-Dawley rats with DMBA induced carcinoma | 500 μg/g body weight in P16, P18, P20 | Reduction in carcinoma incidence |
| Jin Z. | Pre-pubertal rats with DMBA induced carcinoma | 500 mg/kg body weight in P7, P20 | Reduction in tumor multiplicity by 60% |
| Cabanes A. | Pre-pubertal female rats with DMBA induced carcinoma | 50 µg (injection) daily from P7 to P20 | Reduction in the size of the mammary epithelial area, reduction in number of TEB, increased density of lobulo-alveolar structures (increased differentiation), up-regulation of breast cancer tumor suppressor gene 1 (BRCA1) mRNA |
| Ju Y.H. | Ovariectomized athymic mice with MCF-7 xenografts | 125, 1000 μg/g body weight in the diet for 22 weeks | Tumor size was increased in dose-dependent manner; cell proliferation was enhanced at concentration >250 μg/g; increased in pS2, an estrogen responsive gene at concentration >500 μg/g |
| Ju Y.H. | Ovariectomized athymic BALB/c (nude) mice with MCF-7 xenografts | 1000 ppm (1000 μg/g body weight) | Genistein canceled the inhibitory effect of tamoxifen, decreased estradiol level in plasma, increased expression estradiol regulated genes (pS2, progesterone, cyclin D1) |
| Jin Z. | Transgenic mice for MMTV-neu gene | 250 mg/kg for 7 weeks | Mammary tumor latency delayed compared to controls; no reduction in in the number or tumor size |
| Kijkuokool P. | Adult female Sprague-Dawley rats exposed to NMU | 1 mg/kg body weight daily subcutaneous injection for 20 weeks | Increased tumor cross-sectional area, increased tumor multiplicity, but not tumor incidence |
| Constantinou A.I. | Female Sprague-Dawley rats with DMBA breast carcinoma induction | 200 mg/kg diet | Tumor incidence and survival similar to control groups; reduction in tumor multiplicity by 32%; increased median tumor latency |
| Jin Z. | Transgenic mice for MMTV-neu gene | 250 mg/kg for 7 weeks | Mammary tumor latency delayed compared to controls; no reduction in in the number or tumor size |
| Lamartiniere C.A. | Virgin female rats | 250 and 1000 mg/kg in the diet, 2 weeks prior to breeding till 50 day postpartum | Moderate reduction in ovarian and uterine weights and mammary gland size; reduced body weight; reduction in circulating progesterone |
| Ju Y.H. | Ovariectomized athymic mice with MCF-7 human xenografts | 125 to 1000 ppm (125 to 1000 μg/g body weight) | No statistical significant reduction in tumor size and proliferation |
| Banerjee S. | Female Sprague-Dawley rats with DMBA breast carcinoma induction | 10 ppm | Reduction in the incidence (by 45%) and multiplicity (by 55%) of the tumors; increased latency period; suppressed COX-2, MMP-9, NF-kB; no effect on body weight or tumor volume |
| Whitsett T. | Female Sprague-Dawley rats with DMBA breast carcinoma induction | 1 g/kg in the diet | Suppression of mammary carcionogenesis: less number of tumors per rat, longer tumor latency; reduced proliferation; increased apoptosis in epithelial cells of TEB; reduced toxicity: no alterations in body weight |
| Singh B. | August Copenhagen Irish rats (rodent model of breast carcionogenesis) | 50 mg subcutaneous pellet per month, 8 months | Decreased tumor incidence and increases latency in mammary tumors induced by estradiol; upregulated NRF2, a regulator of the anti-oxidant response; induced apoptosis (increased p53 and PARP cleavage) in mammary tissue |
| Whitsett T. | Female Sprague Dawley rats with DMBA and NMU mammary cancer induction | 0.065% in the drinking water | Not efficient in reduction of breast cancer incidence at these doses |
| Verma A.K. | Female Sprague Dawley rats with DMBA and NMU mammary cancer induction | 5% in the diet | Reduction in the number of tumors; decreased tumor multiplicity; no detectable signs of toxicity (similar body weight in treated and control rats) |
| Singh B. | Female August Copenhagen Irish (ACI) rats | 2.5 g/kg in diet, 8 months | No induction of tumors in ACI rats; did not protect against estrogen-induced tumors; did not confer protection against breast cancer and may worsen breast cancer status regularly exposed to estradiol |
| Masuelli L. | BALB-neuT transgenic mice for neu oncogene | n.m. | Increased tumor-free survival; reduction in tumor multiplicity; safe to be administrated: no modification in hematological and clinical chemistry parameters |
Abbreviations: P, postnatal day; DMBA, 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)antracen; TEB, terminal end buds; BRCA1, breast cancer tumor suppressor gene 1; Nrf2, nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor-2; NMU, N-methyl-N-nitrosourea; ppm, parts per million; MMTV, mouse mammary tumor virus; n.m., not mentioned.
Bioavailability of main polyphenols in the human body (adapted from Manach C. et al., [255]).
| Source/Polyphenol | Dose | Concentration in Plasma (µM) | Half-Life (h) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Onions | 100 mg quercetin eq | 7.6 | 10.9 | [ |
| Apples | 107 mg quercetin eq | 0.3 | 23.0 | [ |
| Quercetin | 50 mg | 0.29 | 15.0 | [ |
| Orange juice | 126 mg hesperitin eq | 2.2 | 2.2 | [ |
| Orange juice | 23 mg narigerin eq | 0.64 | 1.3 | [ |
| Grapefruit juice | 199 mg narigerin eq | 5.99 | 2.2 | [ |
| Chocolate (80 g) | 164 mg epicatechin eq | 0.7 | 1.9–2.3 | [ |
| Red wine (120 mL) | 35 mg catechin eq | 0.091 | 3.1 | [ |
| EGCG | 800 mg | 2.33 | 1.9–4.6 | [ |
| Soy beverage | 0.6 mg/kg daidzein eq | 0.3 | 3.4 | [ |
| Soy beverage | 1 mg/kg genistein eq | 0.65 | 7.9 | [ |
| Daidzein | 50 mg | 0.76 | 9.3 | [ |
| Genistein | 50 mg | 1.26 | 6.8 | [ |
Summary of the association between breast cancer risk and soy intake.
| Author, Year | Date of Study | Cases 1 | Ctrl 1 | Diet | Dose 2 | OR/HR/RR (95% CI) | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liu X.O. | 1990–2013 | 9299 | 11,412 | Soy (soy protein, soy food, soya- bean milk) | 1–8 times/week | 0.65 (0.43–0.99) | Soy intake was associate with reduction in breast cancer risk (Chinese women) |
| Nagata C. | 1985–2005 | 2531 | 25,332 | Soy (tofu, soybeans, miso soup) | 1–3 times/week | 0.62 (0.38–1.01) to 1.59 (0.90–2.81) | Soy intake was associated with moderate and strong reduction of breast cancer in post-menopausal Japanese women |
| Fritz H. | 1992–2012 | 1830 c | n.m. | Soy (soy food, soy protein, genistein, IF) | Soy 13.03–65.7 g/day | 0.25 (0.10–0.61) to 1.19 (0.76–1.85) | Soy intake was associated with no change and increase survival, no change and decrease recurrence of breast cancer in Chinese, Korean, USA, Shanghai women, respectively |
| Guha N. | 1997–2000 | 1954 d | n.m. | Daidzein, genistein, glycetin | Daidzein 1.5–9.6 mg/day | Daidzein 0.71 (0.45–1.11) to 1.16 (0.81–1.68) | Decreased risk of breast cancer recurrence was associated with high daidzein and glycetin intake in postM women Women treated with Tamoxifen presented 60% decrease in breast cancer recurrence after daidzein intake |
| Trock B.J. | 1978–2004 | 7453 | 16,521 | Soy protein and tofu | 1–5 times/week | 0.86 (0.75–0.99) preM | Increased soy intake was associated with modest reduction in breast cancer risk Inverse association between soy exposure and breast cancer risk in preM (“stronger”) and postM women Caution with interpreting the data due to high heterogeneity of soy exposure |
| Wu A.H. | 1995–1998 | 501 | 594 | Tofu—adolescence IF—adult | 1–3 times/month +4 times/week | 0.75 (0.48–1.15) | High soy intake during adolescence and adult life was associated with reduced risk of breast cancer (Chinese, Japanese, Filipino women in Los Angeles) |
| Shu X.O. | 1996–1998 | 296 | 359 | Soy food—13–15 years, adolescence | 5.4 g/day | 0.51 (0.40–0.65) | Adolescent soy food intake was inversely associated with breast cancer risk |
Legend: 1—for meta-analysis, the number of cases and controls were summed; 2—high degree of heterogeneity; 3—selection from maximal values presented in the analysis; a—includes case control only; b—includes case control, nested case control, prospective cohort study; c—includes survivors, deaths, recurrences; d—breast cancer survivors 6.31 years after the diagnosis—isoflavone intake and breast cancer recurrence was evaluate; Ctrl, controls; preM, premenopausal status; postM, postmenopausal status; OR, odds ratio; HR, hazard ratio; RR, risk ratio; CI, confidence interval; n.m., not mentioned; wk, week; d, day; mo, months; IF, isoflavone.
Breast cancer: the pros and cons of polyphenols.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
DNA protection by the anti-oxidant activity against carcinogens Decreased glucose uptake in cancer cells Cell cycle arrest, induction of pro-apoptotic and inhibition of anti-apoptotic proteins Modulation signaling pathways (reduced expression of plasma membrane receptors overexpressed in cancer, decreased phosphorylation of intracellular proteins) with implications in tumor growth, invasion and metastasis Generation of new classes of aromatase inhibitors based on the structure of polyphenols (flavones, isoflavones) Reduction in breast cancer risk in Chinese, Japanese women; reduction in breast cancer risk associated with high soy intake during adolescence Decreased risk of breast cancer recurrence (after daidzein intake) | So far not successful in preventing cancer in clinical trials Reduced bioavailability and stability Typically large concentrations have been used in most The chemopreventive and therapeutic activity of polyphenols as single agents or in combination are studied in ongoing trials without final conclusions Heterogeneity in the applied doses, duration of administration, cells and animal models used in the studies |