Literature DB >> 15549093

Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer.

Michael B Kastan1, Jiri Bartek.   

Abstract

All life on earth must cope with constant exposure to DNA-damaging agents such as the Sun's radiation. Highly conserved DNA-repair and cell-cycle checkpoint pathways allow cells to deal with both endogenous and exogenous sources of DNA damage. How much an individual is exposed to these agents and how their cells respond to DNA damage are critical determinants of whether that individual will develop cancer. These cellular responses are also important for determining toxicities and responses to current cancer therapies, most of which target the DNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15549093     DOI: 10.1038/nature03097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  995 in total

1.  Three-dimensionally specific inhibition of DNA repair-related genes by activated KRAS in colon crypt model.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Tsunoda; Yasuo Takashima; Takahiro Fujimoto; Midori Koyanagi; Yasuhiro Yoshida; Keiko Doi; Yoko Tanaka; Masahide Kuroki; Takehiko Sasazuki; Senji Shirasawa
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  Coupled activation and degradation of eEF2K regulates protein synthesis in response to genotoxic stress.

Authors:  Flore Kruiswijk; Laurensia Yuniati; Roberto Magliozzi; Teck Yew Low; Ratna Lim; Renske Bolder; Shabaz Mohammed; Christopher G Proud; Albert J R Heck; Michele Pagano; Daniele Guardavaccaro
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 8.192

3.  Rsf-1, a chromatin remodeling protein, induces DNA damage and promotes genomic instability.

Authors:  Jim Jinn-Chyuan Sheu; Bin Guan; Jung-Hye Choi; Athena Lin; Chia-Huei Lee; Yi-Ting Hsiao; Tian-Li Wang; Fuu-Jen Tsai; Ie-Ming Shih
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  A rapid and optimization-free procedure allows the in vivo detection of subtle cell cycle and ploidy alterations in tissues by flow cytometry.

Authors:  Christina Heinlein; Wolfgang Deppert; Antony W Braithwaite; Daniel Speidel
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  Differential DNA damage signaling accounts for distinct neural apoptotic responses in ATLD and NBS.

Authors:  Erin R P Shull; Youngsoo Lee; Hironobu Nakane; Travis H Stracker; Jingfeng Zhao; Helen R Russell; John H J Petrini; Peter J McKinnon
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Induction of SOX4 by DNA damage is critical for p53 stabilization and function.

Authors:  Xin Pan; Jie Zhao; Wei-Na Zhang; Hui-Yan Li; Rui Mu; Tao Zhou; Hai-Ying Zhang; Wei-Li Gong; Ming Yu; Jiang-Hong Man; Pei-Jing Zhang; Ai-Ling Li; Xue-Min Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Kinases that control the cell cycle in response to DNA damage: Chk1, Chk2, and MK2.

Authors:  H Christian Reinhardt; Michael B Yaffe
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 8.  Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm.

Authors:  Marcos Malumbres; Mariano Barbacid
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  Cdc45 protein-single-stranded DNA interaction is important for stalling the helicase during replication stress.

Authors:  Irina Bruck; Daniel L Kaplan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Clonal Hematopoiesis and Evolution to Hematopoietic Malignancies.

Authors:  Robert L Bowman; Lambert Busque; Ross L Levine
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 24.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.