Literature DB >> 15514280

A 2-year soy intervention in premenopausal women does not change mammographic densities.

Gertraud Maskarinec1, Yumie Takata, Adrian A Franke, Andrew E Williams, Suzanne P Murphy.   

Abstract

Soy consumption may be related to lower breast cancer risk as assessed by breast density. The aims of this 2-y trial were to examine the effects of soy foods and lifetime soy intake on mammographic density. After 220 premenopausal women were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group, the former group consumed 2 daily servings of soy foods equivalent to 50 mg of isoflavones and the latter consumed their regular diet. The respective dropout rates were 15.6 and 12.6%; adherence to the study regimen was high. We assessed lifetime soy intake with a questionnaire and measured breast density in screening mammograms obtained at baseline and at the end of the trial for 98 intervention and 103 control women using a computer-assisted method. None of the mammographic outcomes differed significantly by experimental group. The total area of the breast increased and the size of the dense areas decreased significantly over time in both groups. After 2 y, the mean percentage density had decreased by 2.8 and 4.1% in intervention and control women, respectively. Women who reported eating more soy during their lives had higher percentage densities than women whose diet included little soy; this difference was significant only in Caucasians. Lower soy intake during early life and higher soy intake during adulthood predicted a greater reduction in the percentage density during the study period. After 2 y of intervention, we observed no significant differences in mammographic densities by intervention status, but it appears that soy consumption throughout life may have some effect on breast density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15514280     DOI: 10.1093/jn/134.11.3089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  37 in total

1.  Associations between obesity and serum lipid-soluble micronutrients among premenopausal women.

Authors:  Weiwen Chai; Shannon M Conroy; Gertraud Maskarinec; Adrian A Franke; Ian S Pagano; Robert V Cooney
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Adult ovarian function can be affected by high levels of soy.

Authors:  Wendy N Jefferson
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Double-Blind Randomized 12-Month Soy Intervention Had No Effects on Breast MRI Fibroglandular Tissue Density or Mammographic Density.

Authors:  Anna H Wu; Darcy Spicer; Agustin Garcia; Chiu-Chen Tseng; Linda Hovanessian-Larsen; Pulin Sheth; Sue Ellen Martin; Debra Hawes; Christy Russell; Heather MacDonald; Debu Tripathy; Min-Ying Su; Giske Ursin; Malcolm C Pike
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2015-08-14

Review 4.  NTP-CERHR expert panel report on the reproductive and developmental toxicity of soy formula.

Authors:  Karl K Rozman; Jatinder Bhatia; Antonia M Calafat; Christina Chambers; Martine Culty; Ruth A Etzel; Jodi A Flaws; Deborah K Hansen; Patricia B Hoyer; Elizabeth H Jeffery; James S Kesner; Sue Marty; John A Thomas; David Umbach
Journal:  Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2006-08

5.  The relation of urinary estrogen metabolites with mammographic densities in premenopausal women.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Sreang Heak; Yukiko Morimoto; Laurie Custer; Adrian A Franke
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Soy intake is related to a lower body mass index in adult women.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Alison G Aylward; Eva Erber; Yumie Takata; Laurence N Kolonel
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 5.614

7.  Cytology in nipple aspirate fluid during a randomized soy food intervention among premenopausal women.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Shana Suzuki; Ian S Pagano; Yukiko Morimoto; Adrian A Franke; Hormoz Ehya
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 2.900

Review 8.  The pros and cons of phytoestrogens.

Authors:  Heather B Patisaul; Wendy Jefferson
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 8.606

9.  Milk intake and mammographic density in premenopausal women.

Authors:  Yunan Han; Xiaoyu Zong; Yize Li; Graham A Colditz; Adetunji T Toriola
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Serum coenzyme Q₁₀, α-tocopherol, γ-tocopherol, and C-reactive protein levels and body mass index in adolescent and premenopausal females.

Authors:  Weiwen Chai; Rachel Novotny; Gertraud Maskarinec; Loic Le Marchand; Adrian A Franke; Robert V Cooney
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.