Literature DB >> 25698011

On the spatial distribution of the reflection sources of different latency components of otoacoustic emissions.

Renata Sisto1, Arturo Moleti2, Christopher A Shera3.   

Abstract

The experimental observation of long- and short-latency components in both stimulus-frequency and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions admits a comprehensive explanation within the coherent reflection mechanism, in a linear active transmission-line cochlear model. A local complex reflectivity function associated with roughness was defined and analyzed by varying the tuning factor of the model, systematically showing, for each frequency, a multiple-peak spatial structure, compatible with the observed multiple-latency structure of otoacoustic emissions. Although this spatial pattern and the peak relative intensity changes with the chosen random roughness function, the multiple-peak structure is a reproducible feature of different "digital ears," in good agreement with experimental data. If one computes the predicted transmission delays as a function of frequency and position for each source, one gets a good match to the latency-frequency patterns that are directly computed from synthesized otoacoustic spectra using time-frequency analysis. This result clarifies the role of the spatial distribution of the otoacoustic emission sources, further supporting the interpretation of different-latency otoacoustic components as due to reflection sources localized at different places along the basilar membrane.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25698011      PMCID: PMC4336253          DOI: 10.1121/1.4906583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  Transient-evoked otoacoustic emission generators in a nonlinear cochlea.

Authors:  Arturo Moleti; Teresa Botti; Renata Sisto
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Coherent reflection in a two-dimensional cochlea: Short-wave versus long-wave scattering in the generation of reflection-source otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Arnold Tubis; Carrick L Talmadge
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Generation place of the long- and short-latency components of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a nonlinear cochlear model.

Authors:  Arturo Moleti; Adnan Mohsin Al-Maamury; Daniele Bertaccini; Teresa Botti; Renata Sisto
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Short-latency transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions as predictors of hearing status and thresholds.

Authors:  Ian B Mertes; Shawn S Goodman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; A Tubis; G R Long; P Piskorski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Time-frequency domain filtering of evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Arturo Moleti; Federica Longo; Renata Sisto
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Input/output functions of different-latency components of transient-evoked and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Filippo Sanjust; Arturo Moleti
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Experimental evidence for the basal generation place of the short-latency transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  A Moleti; R Sisto; M Lucertini
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  High-frequency click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and behavioral thresholds in humans.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Denis F Fitzpatrick; John C Ellison; Walt Jesteadt; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  12 in total

1.  Comparisons of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions using chirp and click stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Modeling the dependence of the distortion product otoacoustic emission response on primary frequency ratio.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Uzma Shaheen Wilson; Sumitrajit Dhar; Arturo Moleti
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-26

3.  Localization of the Reflection Sources of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  A Moleti; R Sisto
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-09

4.  Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emission Delays and Generating Mechanisms in Guinea Pigs, Chinchillas, and Simulations.

Authors:  Maria A Berezina-Greene; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-15

5.  Dynamics of cochlear nonlinearity: Automatic gain control or instantaneous damping?

Authors:  Alessandro Altoè; Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Link between stimulus otoacoustic emissions fine structure peaks and standing wave resonances in a cochlear model.

Authors:  Haiqi Wen; Julien Meaud
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Relationship Between Behavioral and Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Delay-Based Tuning Estimates.

Authors:  Uzma Shaheen Wilson; Jenna Browning-Kamins; Sriram Boothalingam; Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Differentiating Middle Ear and Medial Olivocochlear Effects on Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Kendra L Marks; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-21

9.  Profiles of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions from 0.5 to 20 kHz in Humans.

Authors:  James B Dewey; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-28

10.  Reflection-Source Emissions Evoked with Clicks and Frequency Sweeps: Comparisons Across Levels.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.