Literature DB >> 27681700

Profiles of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions from 0.5 to 20 kHz in Humans.

James B Dewey1,2, Sumitrajit Dhar3,4.   

Abstract

The characteristics of human otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) have not been thoroughly examined above the standard audiometric frequency range (>8 kHz). This is despite the fact that deterioration of cochlear function often starts at the basal, high-frequency end of the cochlea before progressing apically. Here, stimulus-frequency OAEs (SFOAEs) were obtained from 0.5 to 20 kHz in 23 young, audiometrically normal female adults and three individuals with abnormal audiograms, using a low-to-moderate probe level of 36 dB forward pressure level (FPL). In audiometrically normal ears, SFOAEs were measurable at frequencies approaching the start of the steeply sloping high-frequency portion of the audiogram (∼12-15 kHz), though their amplitudes often declined substantially above ∼7 kHz, rarely exceeding 0 dB SPL above 8 kHz. This amplitude decline was typically abrupt and occurred at a frequency that was variable across subjects and not strongly related to the audiogram. In contrast, certain ears with elevated mid-frequency thresholds but regions of normal high-frequency sensitivity could possess surprisingly large SFOAEs (>10 dB SPL) above 7 kHz. When also measured, distortion-product OAEs (DPOAEs) usually remained stronger at higher stimulus frequencies and mirrored the audiogram more closely than SFOAEs. However, the high-frequency extent of SFOAE and DPOAE responses was similar when compared as a function of the response frequency, suggesting that middle ear transmission may be a common limiting factor at high frequencies. Nevertheless, cochlear factors are more likely responsible for complexities observed in high-frequency SFOAE spectra, such as abrupt amplitude changes and narrowly defined response peaks above 10 kHz, as well as the large responses in abnormal ears. These factors may include altered cochlear reflectivity due to subtle damage or the reduced spatial extent of the SFOAE generation region at the cochlear base. The use of higher probe levels is necessary to further evaluate the characteristics and potential utility of high-frequency SFOAE measurements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  distortion-product otoacoustic emissions; forward pressure level; high frequencies; stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27681700      PMCID: PMC5243260          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-016-0588-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  61 in total

1.  The roles of the external, middle, and inner ears in determining the bandwidth of hearing.

Authors:  Mario A Ruggero; Andrei N Temchin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Comparing stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions measured by compression, suppression, and spectral smoothing.

Authors:  Radha Kalluri; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Obtaining reliable phase-gradient delays from otoacoustic emission data.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Christopher Bergevin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  On the spatial distribution of the reflection sources of different latency components of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Arturo Moleti; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.125 and 20 kHz using depth-compensated ear simulator calibration.

Authors:  Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar; Rebekah Abel; Renee Banakis; Evan Grolley; Jungwha Lee; Steven Zecker; Jonathan Siegel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a dog.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; B Kramek; N C Rich
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Towards a model for the origin of cochlear echoes.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission: measurements in humans and simulations with an active cochlear model.

Authors:  Yong-Sun Choi; Soo-Young Lee; Kourosh Parham; Stephen T Neely; Duck O Kim
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in chinchilla ear canals: correlation with histopathology and suppression by external tones.

Authors:  W W Clark; D O Kim; P M Zurek; B A Bohne
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  11 in total

1.  High frequency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission measurements using chirp and click stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Chelsea M Blankenship; Angela C Garinis; Daniel B Putterman; Marcin Wróblewski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Characterizing spontaneous otoacoustic emissions across the human lifespan.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A common microstructure in behavioral hearing thresholds and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  James B Dewey; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Swept-tone stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions: Normative data and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Yeini C Guardia; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  No effects of attention or visual perceptual load on cochlear function, as measured with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Efferent-induced alterations in distortion and reflection otoacoustic emissions in children.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Milan Biswal; Anup Amatya
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Characterizing the Relationship Between Reflection and Distortion Otoacoustic Emissions in Normal-Hearing Adults.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-08

8.  Relationship Between Behavioral and Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Delay-Based Tuning Estimates.

Authors:  Uzma Shaheen Wilson; Jenna Browning-Kamins; Sriram Boothalingam; Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions in TectaY1870C/+ Mice Reflect Changes in Cochlear Amplification and How It Is Controlled by the Tectorial Membrane.

Authors:  Mary Ann Cheatham; Yingjie Zhou; Richard J Goodyear; Peter Dallos; Guy P Richardson
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-12-26

10.  Swept-Tone Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Human Newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Yeini Guardia
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.