Literature DB >> 29946952

Modeling the dependence of the distortion product otoacoustic emission response on primary frequency ratio.

Renata Sisto1, Uzma Shaheen Wilson2, Sumitrajit Dhar2, Arturo Moleti3.   

Abstract

When measured as a function of primary frequency ratio r = f2/f1, using a constant f2, distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) response demonstrates a bandpass shape, previously interpreted as the evidence for a cochlear "second filter." In this study, an alternate, interference-based explanation, previously advanced in variants, is forwarded on the basis of experimental data along with numerical and analytical solutions of nonlinear and linear cochlear models. The decrease of the DPOAE response with increasing and decreasing ratios is explained by a diminishing "overlap" generation region and the onset of negative interference among wavelets of different phase, respectively. In this paper, the additional quantitative hypothesis is made that negative interference becomes the dominant effect when the spatial width of the generation (overlap) region exceeds half a wavelength of the DPOAE wavelets. Therefore, r is predicted to be optimal when this condition is matched. Additionally, the minimum on the low-ratio side of the DPOAE curve is predicted to occur as the overlap region width equals one wavelength. As the width of the overlap region depends on both tuning and ratio, while wavelength depends on tuning only, an experimental method for estimating tuning from either the width of the pass band or the optimal ratio of the DPOAE vs. ratio curve has been theoretically formulated and evaluated using numerical simulations. A linear model without the possibility of nonlinear suppression is shown to reasonably approximate data from human subjects at low ratios reinforcing the relevance of the proposed negative interference effect. The different dependence of the distortion and reflection DPOAE components on r as well as the nonmonotonic behavior of the distortion component observed at very low ratios are also in agreement with this interpretation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear mechanics; cochlear tuning; nonlinear models; time-frequency analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29946952      PMCID: PMC6226407          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-018-0681-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  24 in total

Review 1.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

3.  Decoupling the level dependence of the basilar membrane gain and phase in nonlinear cochlea models.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Arturo Moleti; Alessandro Altoè
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Cochlear traveling-wave amplification, suppression, and beamforming probed using noninvasive calibration of intracochlear distortion sources.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; A Tubis; G R Long; P Piskorski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  On the spatial distribution of the reflection sources of different latency components of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Arturo Moleti; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Input/output functions of different-latency components of transient-evoked and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Filippo Sanjust; Arturo Moleti
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission generation mechanisms and their dependence on stimulus level and primary frequency ratio.

Authors:  Teresa Botti; Renata Sisto; Filippo Sanjust; Arturo Moleti; Luisa D'Amato
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.