Literature DB >> 32464079

Relationship Between Behavioral and Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Delay-Based Tuning Estimates.

Uzma Shaheen Wilson1, Jenna Browning-Kamins1, Sriram Boothalingam1,2, Arturo Moleti3, Renata Sisto4, Sumitrajit Dhar1,5.   

Abstract

Purpose The phase delay of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) has been proposed as a noninvasive, objective, and fast source for estimating cochlear mechanical tuning. However, the implementation of SFOAEs clinically has been thwarted by the gaps in understanding of the stability of SFOAE delay-based tuning estimates and their relationship to behavioral measures of tuning. Therefore, the goals of this study were (a) to investigate the relationship between delay-based tuning estimates from SFOAEs and simultaneously masked psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) and (b) to assess the across- and within-session repeatability of tuning estimates from behavioral and OAE measures. Method Three sets of behavioral and OAE measurements were collected in 24 normal-hearing, young adults for two probe frequencies, 1 and 4 kHz. For each participant, delay-based tuning estimates were derived from the phase gradient of SFOAEs. SFOAE-based and behavioral estimates of tuning obtained using the fast-swept PTC paradigm were compared within and across sessions. Results In general, tuning estimates were sharper at 4 kHz compared to 1 kHz for both PTCs and SFOAEs. Statistical analyses revealed a significant correlation between SFOAE delay-based tuning and PTCs at 4 kHz, but not 1 kHz. Lastly, SFOAE delay-based tuning estimates showed better intra- and intersession repeatability compared to PTCs. Conclusions SFOAE phase-gradient delays reflect aspects of cochlear mechanical tuning, in that a frequency dependence similar to that of basilar membrane tuning was observed. Furthermore, the significant correlation with PTCs at 4 kHz and the high repeatability of SFOAE-based tuning measures offer promise of an objective, nonbehavioral assay of tuning in human ears.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32464079      PMCID: PMC7839027          DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  63 in total

1.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

2.  Decoupling the level dependence of the basilar membrane gain and phase in nonlinear cochlea models.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Arturo Moleti; Alessandro Altoè
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Compound action potential (AP) tuning curves.

Authors:  P Dallos; M A Cheatham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Characterizing distortion-product otoacoustic emission components across four species.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; You Sun Chung; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Estimating cochlear tuning dependence on stimulus level and frequency from the delay of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech perception ability and psychophysical tuning curves in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  P G Stelmachowicz; W Jesteadt; M P Gorga; J Mott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Shapes of tuning curves for single auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  N Y Kiang; M B Sachs; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions.

Authors:  D T Kemp; R Chum
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Abnormal speech processing in frequency regions where absolute thresholds are normal for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss.

Authors:  Agnès C Léger; Brian C J Moore; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Hidden Hearing Loss? No Effect of Common Recreational Noise Exposure on Cochlear Nerve Response Amplitude in Humans.

Authors:  Sarah K Grinn; Kathryn B Wiseman; Jason A Baker; Colleen G Le Prell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.