Literature DB >> 34606020

Reflection-Source Emissions Evoked with Clicks and Frequency Sweeps: Comparisons Across Levels.

Karolina K Charaziak1, Christopher A Shera2,3.   

Abstract

According to coherent reflection theory, otoacoustic emissions (OAE) evoked with clicks (clicked-evoked, CE) or tones (stimulus frequency, SF) originate via the same mechanism. We test this hypothesis in gerbils by investigating the similarity of CE- and SFOAEs across a wide range of stimulus levels. The results show that OAE transfer functions measured in response to clicks and sweeps have nearly equivalent time-frequency characteristics, particularly at low stimulus levels. At high stimulus levels, the two OAE types are more dissimilar, reflecting the different dynamic properties of the evoking stimulus. At mid to high stimulus levels, time-frequency analysis reveals contributions from at least two OAE source components of varying latencies. Interference between these components explains the emergence of strong spectral microstructure. Time-frequency filtering based on mean basilar-membrane (BM) group delays (τBM) shows that late-latency OAE components (latency ~ 1.6τBM) dominate at low stimulus intensities and exhibit highly compressive growth with increasing stimulus intensity. In contrast, early-latency OAE components (~ 0.7τBM) are small at low stimulus levels but can come to dominate the overall response at higher intensities. Although the properties of long-latency OAEs are consistent with an origin via coherent reflection near the peak of the traveling wave, the generation place and/or mechanisms responsible for the early-latency OAE components warrant further investigation. Because their delay remains in constant proportion to τBM across sound intensity, long-latency OAEs, whether evoked with tones or clicks, can be used to predict characteristics of cochlear processing, such as the sharpness of frequency tuning, even at high stimulus levels.
© 2021. Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlea; Cochlear tuning; Gerbil; Otoacoustic emissions; Reflection-source

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34606020      PMCID: PMC8599565          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-021-00813-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  55 in total

1.  Swept-tone transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher L Bennett; Özcan Özdamar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Isoresponse versus isoinput estimates of cochlear filter tuning.

Authors:  Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-23

3.  The mechanical waveform of the basilar membrane. I. Frequency modulations ("glides") in impulse responses and cross-correlation functions.

Authors:  E de Boer; A L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Compensating for ear-canal acoustics when measuring otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Tuning of SFOAEs Evoked by Low-Frequency Tones Is Not Compatible with Localized Emission Generation.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-27

6.  Swept-tone stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions: Normative data and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Yeini C Guardia; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Audiometric predictions using stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and middle ear measurements.

Authors:  John C Ellison; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission: measurements in humans and simulations with an active cochlear model.

Authors:  Yong-Sun Choi; Soo-Young Lee; Kourosh Parham; Stephen T Neely; Duck O Kim
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Asymmetry and Microstructure of Temporal-Suppression Patterns in Basilar-Membrane Responses to Clicks: Relation to Tonal Suppression and Traveling-Wave Dispersion.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Wei Dong; Alessandro Altoè; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-03-12

10.  Vibration hotspots reveal longitudinal funneling of sound-evoked motion in the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  Nigel P Cooper; Anna Vavakou; Marcel van der Heijden
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.