Literature DB >> 22501067

Transient-evoked otoacoustic emission generators in a nonlinear cochlea.

Arturo Moleti1, Teresa Botti, Renata Sisto.   

Abstract

This study focuses on the theoretical prediction and experimental evaluation of the latency of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Response components with different delay have been identified in several studies. The main generator of the transient response is assumed to be coherent reflection from cochlear roughness near the resonant place. Additional components of different latency can be generated by different mechanisms. Experimental data are re-analyzed in this study to evaluate the dependence of the latency on stimulus level, for each component of the response, showing that previous estimates of the otoacoustic emission latency were affected by systematic errors. The latency of the emission from each generator changes very little with stimulus level, whereas their different growth rate causes sharp changes of the single-valued latency, estimated as the time of the absolute maximum of the bandpass filtered response. Results of passive linear models, in which gain and bandwidth of the cochlear amplifier are strictly related, are incompatible with the observations. Although active linear models including delayed stiffness terms do predict much slower dependence of latency on the stimulus level, a suitable nonlinear model should be designed, capable of decoupling more effectively the dependence on stimulus level of amplitude and phase of the otoacoustic response.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22501067     DOI: 10.1121/1.3688474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  On the spatial distribution of the reflection sources of different latency components of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Arturo Moleti; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comparisons of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions using chirp and click stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effect of stimulus bandwidth on the nonlinear-derived tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Shawn S Goodman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-23

4.  Basal contributions to short-latency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Shawn S Goodman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-11

5.  Negative-delay sources in distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Christopher A Shera; Arturo Moleti
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Relating the Variability of Tone-Burst Otoacoustic Emission and Auditory Brainstem Response Latencies to the Underlying Cochlear Mechanics.

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2015-12-31

Review 7.  Modelling cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  Guangjian Ni; Stephen J Elliott; Mohammad Ayat; Paul D Teal
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Concurrent measures of contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and of auditory steady-state responses.

Authors:  Ian B Mertes; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Differentiating Middle Ear and Medial Olivocochlear Effects on Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Kendra L Marks; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-21

10.  Medial olivocochlear reflex effects on amplitude growth functions of long- and short-latency components of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Sriram Boothalingam; Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.