Literature DB >> 23967943

Short-latency transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions as predictors of hearing status and thresholds.

Ian B Mertes1, Shawn S Goodman.   

Abstract

Estimating audiometric thresholds using objective measures can be clinically useful when reliable behavioral information cannot be obtained. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) are effective for determining hearing status (normal hearing vs hearing loss), but previous studies have found them less useful for predicting audiometric thresholds. Recent work has demonstrated the presence of short-latency TEOAE components in normal-hearing ears, which have typically been eliminated from the analyses used in previous studies. The current study investigated the ability of short-latency components to predict hearing status and thresholds from 1-4 kHz. TEOAEs were measured in 77 adult ears with thresholds ranging from normal hearing to moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Emissions were bandpass filtered at center frequencies from 1 to 4 kHz. TEOAE waveforms were analyzed within two time windows that contained either short- or long-latency components. Waveforms were quantified by root-mean-square amplitude. Long-latency components were better overall predictors of hearing status and thresholds, relative to short-latency components. There were no significant improvements in predictions when short-latency components were included with long-latency components in multivariate analyses. The results showed that short-latency TEOAE components, as analyzed in the current study, were less predictive of both hearing status and thresholds from 1-4 kHz than long-latency components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23967943     DOI: 10.1121/1.4817831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Cochlear Reflectance and Otoacoustic Emission Predictions of Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Stephen T Neely; Sara E Fultz; Judy G Kopun; Natalie M Lenzen; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  On the spatial distribution of the reflection sources of different latency components of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Arturo Moleti; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Tuning of SFOAEs Evoked by Low-Frequency Tones Is Not Compatible with Localized Emission Generation.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-27

4.  Basal contributions to short-latency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Shawn S Goodman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-11

5.  Reliability and clinical test performance of cochlear reflectance.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Sara E Fultz; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Medial olivocochlear reflex effects on amplitude growth functions of long- and short-latency components of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Sriram Boothalingam; Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Efferent Modulation of Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emission Fine Structure.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; James B Dewey; Sriram Boothalingam; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-10

8.  Objective Assessment System for Hearing Prediction Based on Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Qin Gong; Yin Liu; Runyi Xu; Dong Liang; Zewen Peng; Honghao Yang
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.