Literature DB >> 26373935

Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emission Delays and Generating Mechanisms in Guinea Pigs, Chinchillas, and Simulations.

Maria A Berezina-Greene1,2, John J Guinan3,4,5.   

Abstract

According to coherent reflection theory (CRT), stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) arise from cochlear irregularities coherently reflecting energy from basilar membrane motion within the traveling-wave peak. This reflected energy arrives in the ear canal predominantly with a single delay at each frequency. However, data from humans and animals indicate that (1) SFOAEs can have multiple delay components, (2) low-frequency SFOAE delays are too short to be accounted for by CRT, and (3) "SFOAEs" obtained with a 2nd ("suppressor") tone ≥2 octaves above the probe tone have been interpreted as arising from the area basal to the region of cochlear amplification. To explore these issues, we collected SFOAEs by the suppression method in guinea pigs and time-frequency analyzed these data, simulated SFOAEs, and published chinchilla SFOAEs. Time-frequency analysis revealed that most frequencies showed only one SFOAE delay component while other frequencies had multiple components including some with short delays. We found no systematic patterns in the occurrence of multiple delay components. Using a cochlear model that had significant basilar membrane motion only in the peak region of the traveling wave, simulated SFOAEs had single and multiple delay components similar to the animal SFOAEs. This result indicates that multiple components (including ones with short delays) can originate from cochlear mechanical irregularities in the SFOAE peak region and are not necessarily indicative of SFOAE sources in regions ≥2 octaves basal of the SFOAE peak region. We conclude that SFOAEs obtained with suppressors close to the probe frequency provide information primarily about the mechanical response in the region that receives amplification, and we attribute the too-short SFOAE delays at low frequencies to distortion-source SFOAEs and coherent reflection from multiple cochlear motions. Our findings suggest that CRT needs revision to include reflections from multiple motions in the cochlear apex.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear mechanics; Coherent reflection; SFOAE; TEOAE

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26373935      PMCID: PMC4636597          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-015-0543-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  46 in total

1.  Modeling the combined effects of basilar membrane nonlinearity and roughness on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission fine structure.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; A Tubis; G R Long; C Tong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Nanomechanics of the subtectorial space caused by electromechanics of cochlear outer hair cells.

Authors:  Manuela Nowotny; Anthony W Gummer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans: otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAEs.

Authors:  John J Guinan; Bradford C Backus; Watjana Lilaonitkul; Vered Aharonson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-06-13

4.  Saturation of outer hair cell receptor currents causes two-tone suppression.

Authors:  C D Geisler; G K Yates; R B Patuzzi; B M Johnstone
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Cochlear nerve fiber discharge patterns: relationship to the cochlear microphonic.

Authors:  R R Pfeiffer; C E Molnar
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-03-20       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Anomalous phase relations in threshold-level responses from gerbil auditory nerve fibers.

Authors:  D A Ronken
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Single-fibre responses to clicks in relationship to the compound action potential in the guinea pig.

Authors:  H Versnel; V F Prijs; R Schoonhoven
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The origin of SFOAE microstructure in the guinea pig.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Robert H Withnell; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  4 in total

1.  Localization of the Reflection Sources of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  A Moleti; R Sisto
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-09

2.  Electrically Evoked Medial Olivocochlear Efferent Effects on Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Guinea Pigs.

Authors:  Maria A Berezina-Greene; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-31

3.  Relationship Between Behavioral and Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Delay-Based Tuning Estimates.

Authors:  Uzma Shaheen Wilson; Jenna Browning-Kamins; Sriram Boothalingam; Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Medial olivocochlear reflex effects on amplitude growth functions of long- and short-latency components of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Sriram Boothalingam; Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.714

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.