Literature DB >> 28432471

Differentiating Middle Ear and Medial Olivocochlear Effects on Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.

Kendra L Marks1, Jonathan H Siegel2.   

Abstract

The response of the inner ear is modulated by the middle ear muscle (MEM) and olivocochlear (OC) efferent systems. Both systems can be activated reflexively by acoustic stimuli delivered to one or both ears. The acoustic middle ear muscle reflex (MEMR) controls the transmission of acoustic signals through the middle ear, while reflex activation of the medial component of the olivocochlear system (the MOCR) modulates cochlear mechanics. The relative prominence of the two efferent systems varies widely between species. Measuring the effect of either of these systems can be confounded by simultaneously activating the other. We describe a simple, sensitive online method that can identify the effects both systems have on otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) evoked by transient stimuli such as clicks or tone pips (TEOAEs). The method detects directly in the time domain the changes in the stimulus and/or emission pressures caused by contralateral noise. Measurements in human participants are consistent with other reports that the threshold for MOCR activation is consistently lower than for MEMR. The method appears to control for drift and subject-generated noise well enough to avoid the need for post hoc processing, making it promising for application in animal experiments (even if awake) and in the hearing clinic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acoustic reflex; contralateral noise; olivocochlear; otoacoustic emissions; transient-evoked

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28432471      PMCID: PMC5532181          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-017-0621-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  56 in total

1.  Effects of the crossed acoustic reflex on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in awake rabbits.

Authors:  M L Whitehead; G K Martin; B L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Within- and Across-Subject Variability of Repeated Measurements of Medial Olivocochlear-Induced Changes in Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Ian B Mertes; Shawn S Goodman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Measurement of the distribution of medial olivocochlear acoustic reflex strengths across normal-hearing individuals via otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Bradford C Backus; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-10-12

4.  Comparing stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions measured by compression, suppression, and spectral smoothing.

Authors:  Radha Kalluri; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  On the spatial distribution of the reflection sources of different latency components of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Arturo Moleti; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.125 and 20 kHz using depth-compensated ear simulator calibration.

Authors:  Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar; Rebekah Abel; Renee Banakis; Evan Grolley; Jungwha Lee; Steven Zecker; Jonathan Siegel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 7.  Cochlear efferent innervation and function.

Authors:  John J Guinan
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.064

8.  Wideband acoustic-reflex test in a test battery to predict middle-ear dysfunction.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Denis Fitzpatrick; Yi-Wen Liu; Chris A Sanford; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  The effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-10-02

10.  Fast and slow effects of medial olivocochlear efferent activity in humans.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Click-Evoked Auditory Efferent Activity: Rate and Level Effects.

Authors:  Sriram Boothalingam; Julianne Kurke; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-07

2.  Effects of cochlear synaptopathy on middle-ear muscle reflexes in unanesthetized mice.

Authors:  Michelle D Valero; Kenneth E Hancock; Stéphane F Maison; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  The role of the medial olivocochlear reflex in psychophysical masking and intensity resolution in humans: a review.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.974

4.  Olivocochlear Efferent Activity Is Associated With the Slope of the Psychometric Function of Speech Recognition in Noise.

Authors:  Ian B Mertes; Erin C Wilbanks; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  Heightened visual attention does not affect inner ear function as measured by otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  W Wiktor Jedrzejczak; Rafal Milner; Lukasz Olszewski; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  The Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Is Unlikely to Play a Role in Listening Difficulties in Children.

Authors:  Sriram Boothalingam; Chris Allan; Prudence Allen; David W Purcell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  The characteristic of otoacoustic emissions in full-term neonates according to ABO blood groups.

Authors:  Aifeng Li; Guoqiang Gao; Ningyu Wang; Tao Fu; Fugao Zhu; Xiaoheng Zhang; Jie Liu
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-12-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.