Literature DB >> 27506533

Localization of the Reflection Sources of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions.

A Moleti1, R Sisto2.   

Abstract

The generation of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission (SFOAE) residuals in humans is analyzed both theoretically and experimentally to investigate the relation between the frequency difference between the probe and the suppressor tone and the localization of the residual source. Experimental measurements of the SFOAE residual were performed using suppressors of increasing frequency to separate the otoacoustic response from the probe stimulus. From the response to the probe alone, the SFOAE response was also estimated, using spectral smoothing, and compared with the residuals obtained for different frequency suppressors. A nonlinear delayed-stiffness active cochlear model was used to compute the spatial distribution of the residual sources according to a recent model of the local reflectivity from roughness, as a function of the suppressor frequency. The simulations clarified the role of high-frequency suppressors, showing that in humans, with increasing suppressor frequency, the generation region of the residual is only slightly basally shifted with respect to the case of a near-frequency suppressor, near the basal edge of the peak of the resonant basilar membrane response. As a consequence, the hierarchy among different-delay components correspondingly changes, gradually favoring short-delay components, with increasing suppressor frequency. Good agreement between the experimental and theoretical dependence of the level of otoacoustic components of different delay on the frequency shift between probe and suppressor confirms the validity of this interpretation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  local reflectivity; nonlinear cochlear models; phase-gradient delay; suppression; time-frequency analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27506533      PMCID: PMC5023541          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-016-0580-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  13 in total

1.  Comparing stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions measured by compression, suppression, and spectral smoothing.

Authors:  Radha Kalluri; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Measuring distortion product otoacoustic emissions using continuously sweeping primaries.

Authors:  Glenis R Long; Carrick L Talmadge; Jungmee Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later.

Authors:  D D Greenwood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  G Zweig; C A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; A Tubis; G R Long; P Piskorski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Time-frequency distributions of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  G Tognola; F Grandori; P Ravazzani
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  On the spatial distribution of the reflection sources of different latency components of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Arturo Moleti; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Time-frequency domain filtering of evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Arturo Moleti; Federica Longo; Renata Sisto
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Input/output functions of different-latency components of transient-evoked and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Filippo Sanjust; Arturo Moleti
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions.

Authors:  D T Kemp; R Chum
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Olivocochlear efferents: Their action, effects, measurement and uses, and the impact of the new conception of cochlear mechanical responses.

Authors:  John J Guinan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Electrically Evoked Medial Olivocochlear Efferent Effects on Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Guinea Pigs.

Authors:  Maria A Berezina-Greene; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-31

3.  Neural Encoding of Amplitude Modulations in the Human Efferent System.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Milan Biswal
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-04-29

4.  The Elusive Cochlear Filter: Wave Origin of Cochlear Cross-Frequency Masking.

Authors:  Alessandro Altoè; Karolina K Charaziak; James B Dewey; Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto; John S Oghalai; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-22

5.  Medial olivocochlear reflex effects on amplitude growth functions of long- and short-latency components of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Sriram Boothalingam; Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Sexual Dimorphism in the Functional Development of the Cochlear Amplifier in Humans.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Samantha Zambrano; Hansapani Rodrigo
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.