Literature DB >> 1776423

A clinical comparison of optical and ultrasonic pachometry.

J Nissen1, J O Hjortdal, N Ehlers, K Frost-Larsen, T Sørensen.   

Abstract

Central corneal thickness (CCT) of normal and oedematous corneae was measured in a study comparing a modified Haag-Streit optical pachometer and an ultrasonic pachometer (Teknar Ophthasonic, preset velocity 1630 m/s). Sixty-eight patients were examined before and after cataract extraction with implantation of an anterior chamber lens. Mean values of CCT before operation were 531 +/- 4.9 (SEM) micron by optical pachometry and 524 +/- 4.7 microns when measured by ultrasound (not significantly different). On the first post-operative day the values were 618 +/- 8.4 and 602 +/- 7.6 microns for optical and ultrasonic measurements, respectively (significantly different, 2P less than 0.001). Correlation analysis showed a high dependence between the methods with coefficients of correlation being 0.955 before and 0.958 after the operation. Linear regression analysis revealed small, but significant differences between the techniques. The difference between the two methods increased with increasing corneal hydration, whereas it could not be ascribed to sex, age, or intraocular pressure. It is concluded that for clinical purposes optical and ultrasonic pachometry techniques are comparable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1776423     DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1991.tb04857.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)        ISSN: 0001-639X


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, non-contact specular microscopy, and ultrasonic pachymetry in eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  K Kawana; T Tokunaga; K Miyata; F Okamoto; T Kiuchi; T Oshika
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Corneal wound healing after photorefractive keratectomy: a 3-year confocal microscopy study.

Authors:  Jay C Erie
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2003

3.  Comparison between central corneal thickness measurements by oculus pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry.

Authors:  Hani S Al-Mezaine; Saleh A Al-Amro; Dustan Kangave; Abdulkareem Sadaawy; Taher A Wehaib; Saleh Al-Obeidan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Central corneal thickness in southern Egypt.

Authors:  Engy Mohamed Mostafa
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Meta-analysis of Pentacam vs. ultrasound pachymetry in central corneal thickness measurement in normal, post-LASIK or PRK, and keratoconic or keratoconus-suspect eyes.

Authors:  Wenjing Wu; Yan Wang; Lulu Xu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three new optical devices and a standard ultrasonic pachymeter.

Authors:  Hasan Ali Bayhan; Seray Aslan Bayhan; Izzet Can
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Effect of 2% fluorescein on Scheimpflug central corneal thickness measurements.

Authors:  Stella Briggs; Marwa Bin Moammar
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  Central corneal thickness determined with optical coherence tomography in various types of glaucoma.

Authors:  M Bechmann; M J Thiel; B Roesen; S Ullrich; M W Ulbig; K Ludwig
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Corneal pachymetry mapping with high-speed optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Yan Li; Raj Shekhar; David Huang
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Central Corneal Thickness Measurement by Ultrasound versus Orbscan II.

Authors:  Amir Faramarzi; Hossein Ziai
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2008-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.