Literature DB >> 36017056

Monitoring of central corneal thickness after phacoemulsification-comparison of statical and rotating Scheimpflug pachymetry, and spectral-domain OCT.

Daniel M Handzel1, Carsten H Meyer2, Alfred Wegener3.   

Abstract

AIM: To explore the possibility of deploying three contactless devices (static and rotating Scheimpflug technology, spectral domain optical coherence tomography) for measuring central corneal thickness (CCT) in preoperative and postoperative examinations of cataract patients.
METHODS: Totally 72 patients who had undergone surgery without complications were selected. The CCT was measured prior to the operation, as well as on the first, 5th-7th and 28th day following the operation using the Nidek NT 530-P, Sirius®, and Topcon OCT-2000 devices.
RESULTS: A significant postoperative increase and subsequent decrease in CCT was identified with all three devices. The correlations were highly significant and thus reflect a very good degree of comparability at all times with the exception of the rotating Scheimpflug camera. The postoperative results from the latter differed significantly from the other devices. The correlations were Sirius/Topcon (P=0.010) and Sirius/Nidek (P<0.0005). No statistically significant difference could be identified in the comparison between Topcon and Nidek (P=0.056).
CONCLUSION: All three devices are suitable for postoperative monitoring of CCT. The measurement results are only comparable to a limited extent and not interchangeable in the course of treating a single patient. This is due to the different imaging technology used in the devices and the resulting modalities for conducting the measurements. International Journal of Ophthalmology Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Scheimpflug imaging; cataract surgery; corneal thickness; optical coherence tomography; pachymetry

Year:  2022        PMID: 36017056      PMCID: PMC9358173          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2022.08.07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.645


  41 in total

1.  Central corneal thickness measurements with Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography versus ultrasonic pachymetry and rotating Scheimpflug camera.

Authors:  Akihiro Ishibazawa; Sho Igarashi; Kazuomi Hanada; Taiji Nagaoka; Satoshi Ishiko; Haruna Ito; Akitoshi Yoshida
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Measurement of central corneal thickness using Orbscan 3, Pentacam HR and ultrasound pachymetry in normal eyes.

Authors:  Hesham Mohamed Gharieb; Doaa Maamoun Ashour; Mohamed Ibrahim Saleh; Ihab Saad Othman
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Reproducibility and reliability of central corneal thickness determination in more and less profound corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, a Scheimpflug camera and anterior segment OCT.

Authors:  Kuerten David; Hossein-Zadeh Mandana; Plange Niklas; Walter Peter; Fuest Matthias
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  [Scheimpflug photographic imaging following implantation of anterior and posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses: preliminary results].

Authors:  M Baumeister; J Bühren; E M Schnitzler; C Ohrloff; T Kohnen
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 0.700

5.  Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry.

Authors:  Yaniv Barkana; Yariv Gerber; Uri Elbaz; Shulamit Schwartz; Gie Ken-Dror; Isaac Avni; David Zadok
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Early corneal pachymetry maps after cataract surgery and influence of 3D digital visualization system in minimizing corneal oedema.

Authors:  Otman Sandali; Mohamed El Sanharawi; Rachid Tahiri Joutei Hassani; Hillary Roux; Nacim Bouheraoua; Vincent Borderie
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.761

7.  A comparison of central corneal thickness measured using noncontact methods and ultrasonic pachymetry.

Authors:  M Toptan; A Simsek
Journal:  Niger J Clin Pract       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 0.968

8.  Central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth measurement by Sirius(®) Scheimpflug tomography and ultrasound.

Authors:  J Jorge; Jl Rosado; Ja Díaz-Rey; Jm González-Méijome
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-26

9.  Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry.

Authors:  Tarannum Mansoori
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Variability of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements-Comparing Zeiss IOL Master and Tomey Corneal Specular Microscope.

Authors:  James Yuheng Jiang; Keith Ong
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.