Literature DB >> 10734239

Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach.

M J Doughty1, M L Zaman.   

Abstract

We determined the "normal" central corneal thickness (CCT) value in human corneas based on reported literature values for within-study average CCT values, and used this as a reference to assess the reported impact of physiological variables (especially age and diurnal effects), contact lens wear, pharmaceuticals, ocular disease, and ophthalmic surgery on CCT. With the expected CCT and its variance defined, it should be possible to determine the potential impact of differences in CCT in intraocular pressure (IOP) assessments, especially by applanation tonometry, using a meta-analysis approach. Some 600 sets of CCT data were identified from the worldwide literature over the period of 1968 through mid-1999, of which 134 included IOP measures as well. The within-study average CCT values and reported variance (SD) was noted along with the number of eyes and any special characteristics, including probable ethnic origin of the study subjects. Various sets of data were subjected to statistical analyses. From 300 data sets from eyes designated as normal, the group-averaged CCT was 0.534 mm. From 230 data sets where interindividual variance was reported, the group-averaged CCT was 0.536 mm (median 0.536 mm; average SD of 0. 031 mm, average coefficient of variation = 5.8%). Overall, studies using slit-lamp-based pachometry have reported marginally lower CCT values (average 0.530 mm, average SD 0.029 mm) compared to ultrasound-based studies (average 0.544, average SD 0.034 mm), which perhaps reflects the type of individual studied (non-surgical vs. pre-surgical patients) rather than the technique itself. A slight chronological increase in reported average CCT values (approximately 0.006 mm/decade) was evident, but a substantial chronological increase was evident for ultrasound pachometry studies (approximately 0.015 mm/decade). Within the meta-analysis-generated average and variance, age had no obvious impact on CCT measures for *whites, although an age-related decline in CCT is evident for non-whites. Any diurnal effects are likely concealed within the expected variance in CCT. Contact lens wear and pharmaceuticals generally produced changes in CCT that were well within the expected variance in CCT. Of the ocular diseases, only those associated with collagen disorders (including keratoconus) or endothelial-based corneal dystrophies (e.g., Fuchs) were likely to result in decreases or increases, respectively, of CCT beyond the normal variance. Routine contact lens wear and diseases such as diabetes seem unlikely to produce changes in CCT of a magnitude that would justify pachometry as a monitoring method beyond routine slit-lamp evaluation. Increases in CCT beyond the expected variance were reported after a range of intraocular surgeries (cataract operations, penetrating keratoplasty), whereas photorefractive surgery produces a measurable decrease in CCT. A meta-analysis of possible association between CCT and IOP measures of 133 data sets, regardless of the type of eyes assessed, revealed a statistically significant correlation; a 10% difference in CCT would result in a 3. 4 +/- 0.9 mm Hg difference in IOP (P </= 0.001, r = 0.419). The observed phenomenon was much smaller for eyes designated as healthy (1.1 +/- 0.6 mm Hg for a 10% difference in CCT, P = 0.023, r = 0. 331). For eyes with chronic diseases, the change was 2.5 +/- 1.1 mm Hg for a 10% difference in CCT (P = 0.005, r = 0.450), whereas a substantial but highly variable association was seen for eyes with acute onset disease (approximately 10.0 +/- 3.1 mm Hg for a 10% difference in CCT, P = 0.004, r = 0.623). Based on the meta-analysis, normal CCT in white adults would be expected to be within +/-11.6% (+/-2 SD) of 0.535 mm, i.e., 0.473-0.597 mm (95% CI, 0.474-0.596). The impact of CCT on applanation tonometry of healthy eyes is unlikely to achieve clinical significance, but for corneas of eyes with chronic disease, pachometry should be performed if the tonometry reveals IOP readi

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10734239     DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6257(00)00110-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0039-6257            Impact factor:   6.048


  296 in total

1.  Terahertz sensing in corneal tissues.

Authors:  David B Bennett; Zachary D Taylor; Pria Tewari; Rahul S Singh; Martin O Culjat; Warren S Grundfest; Daniel J Sassoon; R Duncan Johnson; Jean-Pierre Hubschman; Elliott R Brown
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of ultrasonic pachymetry measurements of central corneal thickness.

Authors:  S Miglior; E Albe; M Guareschi; G Mandelli; S Gomarasca; N Orzalesi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Effect of a tight necktie on intraocular pressure.

Authors:  C Teng; R Gurses-Ozden; J M Liebmann; C Tello; R Ritch
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  A few remarks about glaucoma.

Authors:  A Wegner
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  The effects of corneal parameters on the assessment of endothelial cell density in the elderly eye.

Authors:  A Müller; J P Craig; C N Grupcheva; C N J McGhee
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  White-to-white corneal diameter, pupil diameter, central corneal thickness and thinnest corneal thickness values of emmetropic subjects.

Authors:  Juan A Sanchis-Gimeno; Daniel Sanchez-Zuriaga; Francisco Martinez-Soriano
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Depth-dependent transverse shear properties of the human corneal stroma.

Authors:  Steven J Petsche; Dimitri Chernyak; Jaime Martiz; Marc E Levenston; Peter M Pinsky
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Corneal displacement during tonometry with a noncontact tonometer.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Kiuchi; Makoto Kaneko; Hideki Mochizuki; Joji Takenaka; Kenji Yamada; Junko Tanaka
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  The effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurement in patients with corneal pathology.

Authors:  A C Browning; A Bhan; A P Rotchford; S Shah; H S Dua
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Corneal pachymetry mapping with high-speed optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Yan Li; Raj Shekhar; David Huang
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.