Literature DB >> 21476688

Modeling subharmonic response from contrast microbubbles as a function of ambient static pressure.

Amit Katiyar1, Kausik Sarkar, Flemming Forsberg.   

Abstract

Variation of subharmonic response from contrast microbubbles with ambient pressure is numerically investigated for non-invasive monitoring of organ-level blood pressure. Previously, several contrast microbubbles both in vitro and in vivo registered approximately linear (5-15 dB) subharmonic response reduction with 188 mm Hg change in ambient pressure. In contrast, simulated subharmonic response from a single microbubble is seen here to either increase or decrease with ambient pressure. This is shown using the code BUBBLESIM for encapsulated microbubbles, and then the underlying dynamics is investigated using a free bubble model. The ratio of the excitation frequency to the natural frequency of the bubble is the determining parameter--increasing ambient pressure increases natural frequency thereby changing this ratio. For frequency ratio below a lower critical value, increasing ambient pressure monotonically decreases subharmonic response. Above an upper critical value of the same ratio, increasing ambient pressure increases subharmonic response; in between, the subharmonic variation is non-monotonic. The precise values of frequency ratio for these three different trends depend on bubble radius and excitation amplitude. The modeled increase or decrease of subharmonic with ambient pressure, when one happens, is approximately linear only for certain range of excitation levels. Possible reasons for discrepancies between model and previous experiments are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21476688      PMCID: PMC3087400          DOI: 10.1121/1.3552884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  33 in total

1.  Pressure dependence of subharmonic signals from contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  W T Shi; F Forsberg; J S Raichlen; L Needleman; B B Goldberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Noninvasive blood pressure measurement in mice using pulsed Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  Anilkumar K Reddy; George E Taffet; Sridhar Madala; Lloyd H Michael; Mark L Entman; Craig J Hartley
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements.

Authors:  N de Jong; L Hoff; T Skotland; N Bom
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  On the relationship between encapsulated ultrasound contrast agent and pressure.

Authors:  Dan Adam; Michal Sapunar; Elina Burla
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Characterization of ultrasound contrast microbubbles using in vitro experiments and viscous and viscoelastic interface models for encapsulation.

Authors:  Kausik Sarkar; William T Shi; Dhiman Chatterjee; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  In vivo pressure estimation using subharmonic contrast microbubble signals: proof of concept.

Authors:  Flemming Forsberg; Ji-Bin Liu; William T Shi; Junji Furuse; Masafumi Shimizu; Barry B Goldberg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  On the effect of lung filtering and cardiac pressure on the standard properties of ultrasound contrast agent.

Authors:  A Bouakaz; N de Jong; C Cachard; K Jouini
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.890

8.  A new noninvasive technique for cardiac pressure measurement: resonant scattering of ultrasound from bubbles.

Authors:  W M Fairbank; M O Scully
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Noninvasive assessment of pressure gradients across iliac artery stenoses: duplex and catheter correlative study.

Authors:  A L Strauss; F J Roth; H Rieger
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Growth and dissolution of an encapsulated contrast microbubble: effects of encapsulation permeability.

Authors:  Kausik Sarkar; Amit Katiyar; Pankaj Jain
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  15 in total

1.  Excitation threshold for subharmonic generation from contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  Amit Katiyar; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Improving the sensitivity of high-frequency subharmonic imaging with coded excitation: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Himanshu Shekhar; Marvin M Doyley
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Subharmonic microbubble emissions for noninvasively tracking right ventricular pressures.

Authors:  Jaydev K Dave; Valgerdur G Halldorsdottir; John R Eisenbrey; Joel S Raichlen; Ji-Bin Liu; Maureen E McDonald; Kris Dickie; Shumin Wang; Corina Leung; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Impact of hydrostatic pressure on phase-change contrast agent activation by pulsed ultrasound.

Authors:  Saurabh Raut; Mawia Khairalseed; Arvin Honari; Shashank R Sirsi; Kenneth Hoyt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of encapsulation damping on the excitation threshold for subharmonic generation from contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  Amit Katiyar; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Three-dimensional subharmonic ultrasound imaging in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  John R Eisenbrey; Anush Sridharan; Priscilla Machado; Hongjia Zhao; Valgerdur G Halldorsdottir; Jaydev K Dave; Ji-Bin Liu; Suhyun Park; Scott Dianis; Kirk Wallace; Kai E Thomenius; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Subharmonic contrast microbubble signals for noninvasive pressure estimation under static and dynamic flow conditions.

Authors:  Valgerdur G Halldorsdottir; Jaydev K Dave; Lauren M Leodore; John R Eisenbrey; Suhyun Park; Anne L Hall; Kai Thomenius; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.578

8.  The delayed onset of subharmonic and ultraharmonic emissions from a phospholipid-shelled microbubble contrast agent.

Authors:  Himanshu Shekhar; Ivy Awuor; Keri Thomas; Joshua J Rychak; Marvin M Doyley
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  On the implementation of an automated acoustic output optimization algorithm for subharmonic aided pressure estimation.

Authors:  J K Dave; V G Halldorsdottir; J R Eisenbrey; D A Merton; J B Liu; P Machado; H Zhao; S Park; S Dianis; C L Chalek; K E Thomenius; D B Brown; F Forsberg
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 2.890

10.  Investigating the efficacy of subharmonic aided pressure estimation for portal vein pressures and portal hypertension monitoring.

Authors:  Jaydev K Dave; Valgerdur G Halldorsdottir; John R Eisenbrey; Daniel A Merton; Ji-Bin Liu; Jian-Hua Zhou; Hsin-Kai Wang; Suhyun Park; Scott Dianis; Carl L Chalek; Feng Lin; Kai E Thomenius; Daniel B Brown; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.