Literature DB >> 22561300

Subharmonic microbubble emissions for noninvasively tracking right ventricular pressures.

Jaydev K Dave1, Valgerdur G Halldorsdottir, John R Eisenbrey, Joel S Raichlen, Ji-Bin Liu, Maureen E McDonald, Kris Dickie, Shumin Wang, Corina Leung, Flemming Forsberg.   

Abstract

Right heart catheterization is often required to monitor intra-cardiac pressures in a number of disease states. Ultrasound contrast agents can produce pressure modulated subharmonic emissions that may be used to estimate right ventricular (RV) pressures. A technique based on subharmonic acoustic emissions from ultrasound contrast agents to track RV pressures noninvasively has been developed and its clinical potential evaluated. The subharmonic signals were obtained from the aorta, RV, and right atrium (RA) of five anesthetized closed-chest mongrel dogs using a SonixRP ultrasound scanner and PA4-2 phased array. Simultaneous pressure measurements were obtained using a 5-French solid state micromanometer tipped catheter. Initially, aortic subharmonic signals and systemic blood pressures were used to obtain a calibration factor in units of millimeters of mercury per decibel. This factor was combined with RA pressures (that can be obtained noninvasively) and the acoustic data from the RV to obtain RV pressure values. The individual calibration factors ranged from -2.0 to -4.0 mmHg/dB. The subharmonic signals tracked transient changes in the RV pressures within an error of 0.6 mmHg. Relative to the catheter pressures, the mean errors in estimating RV peak systolic and minimum diastolic pressures, and RV relaxation [isovolumic negative derivative of change in pressure over time (-dP/dt)] by use of the subharmonic signals, were -2.3 mmHg, -0.8 mmHg, and 2.9 mmHg/s, respectively. Overall, acoustic estimates of RV peak systolic and minimum diastolic pressures and RV relaxation were within 3.4 mmHg, 1.8 mmHg, and 5.9 mmHg/s, respectively, of the measured pressures. This pilot study demonstrates that subharmonic emissions from ultrasound contrast agents have the potential to noninvasively track in vivo RV pressures with errors below 3.5 mmHg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22561300      PMCID: PMC3404645          DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00560.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  31 in total

1.  Noninvasive measurement of the hydrostatic pressure in a fluid-filled cavity based on the disappearance time of micrometer-sized free gas bubbles.

Authors:  A Bouakaz; P J Frinking; N de Jong; N Bom
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Pressure dependence of subharmonic signals from contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  W T Shi; F Forsberg; J S Raichlen; L Needleman; B B Goldberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Dynamic manipulation of the subharmonic scattering of phospholipid-coated microbubbles.

Authors:  Telli Faez; Guillaume Renaud; Marielle Defontaine; Samuel Calle; Nico de Jong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A new noninvasive technique for cardiac pressure measurement: resonant scattering of ultrasound from bubbles.

Authors:  W M Fairbank; M O Scully
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Structural analysis of pressure versus volume overload hypertrophy of cat right ventricle.

Authors:  T A Marino; R L Kent; C E Uboh; E Fernandez; E W Thompson; G Cooper
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1985-08

Review 6.  Neutrophil kinetics and lung injury.

Authors:  J C Hogg
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-21

8.  A new approach to noninvasive manometry: interaction between ultrasound and bubbles.

Authors:  B Hök
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Reverse cardiac remodelling in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension after isolated lung transplantation.

Authors:  Marie-Theres Kasimir; Gernot Seebacher; Peter Jaksch; Günther Winkler; Katharina Schmid; Gabriel M Marta; Paul Simon; Walter Klepetko
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators.

Authors:  A F Connors; T Speroff; N V Dawson; C Thomas; F E Harrell; D Wagner; N Desbiens; L Goldman; A W Wu; R M Califf; W J Fulkerson; H Vidaillet; S Broste; P Bellamy; J Lynn; W A Knaus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-09-18       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  9 in total

1.  Non-Invasive Intra-cardiac Pressure Measurements Using Subharmonic-Aided Pressure Estimation: Proof of Concept in Humans.

Authors:  Jaydev K Dave; Sushmita V Kulkarni; Purva P Pangaonkar; Maria Stanczak; Maureen E McDonald; Ira S Cohen; Praveen Mehrotra; Michael P Savage; Paul Walinsky; Nicholas J Ruggiero; David L Fischman; David Ogilby; Carolyn VanWhy; Matthew Lombardi; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  A Noninvasive Ultrasound Based Technique to Identify Treatment Responders in Patients with Portal Hypertension.

Authors:  Ipshita Gupta; Jonathan M Fenkel; John R Eisenbrey; Priscilla Machado; Maria Stanczak; Corinne E Wessner; Colette M Shaw; Cynthia Miller; Michael C Soulen; Kirk Wallace; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Encapsulated microbubbles and echogenic liposomes for contrast ultrasound imaging and targeted drug delivery.

Authors:  Shirshendu Paul; Rahul Nahire; Sanku Mallik; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  Comput Mech       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  Comparing Central Aortic Pressures Obtained Using a SphygmoCor Device to Pressures Obtained Using a Pressure Catheter.

Authors:  Cara Esposito; Priscilla Machado; Ira S Cohen; Praveen Mehrotra; Michael Savage; David Fischman; Marguerite Davis; Nicholas Ruggiero; Paul Walinsky; Maureen E McDonald; Kristopher Dickie; Flemming Forsberg; Jaydev K Dave
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.689

5.  The delayed onset of subharmonic and ultraharmonic emissions from a phospholipid-shelled microbubble contrast agent.

Authors:  Himanshu Shekhar; Ivy Awuor; Keri Thomas; Joshua J Rychak; Marvin M Doyley
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Effect of Pulse Shaping on Subharmonic Aided Pressure Estimation In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Ipshita Gupta; John Eisenbrey; Maria Stanczak; Anush Sridharan; Jaydev K Dave; Ji-Bin Liu; Christopher Hazard; Xinghua Wang; Ping Wang; Huiwen Li; Kirk Wallace; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  On the implementation of an automated acoustic output optimization algorithm for subharmonic aided pressure estimation.

Authors:  J K Dave; V G Halldorsdottir; J R Eisenbrey; D A Merton; J B Liu; P Machado; H Zhao; S Park; S Dianis; C L Chalek; K E Thomenius; D B Brown; F Forsberg
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 2.890

8.  Developing an Interface and Investigating Optimal Parameters for Real-Time Intracardiac Subharmonic-Aided Pressure Estimation.

Authors:  Cara Esposito; Kris Dickie; Flemming Forsberg; Jaydev K Dave
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Diagnosing Portal Hypertension with Noninvasive Subharmonic Pressure Estimates from a US Contrast Agent.

Authors:  Ipshita Gupta; John R Eisenbrey; Priscilla Machado; Maria Stanczak; Corinne E Wessner; Colette M Shaw; Sriharsha Gummadi; Jonathan M Fenkel; Alison Tan; Cynthia Miller; Julia Parent; Susan Schultz; Michael C Soulen; Chandra M Sehgal; Kirk Wallace; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 11.105

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.