Literature DB >> 15866417

On the relationship between encapsulated ultrasound contrast agent and pressure.

Dan Adam1, Michal Sapunar, Elina Burla.   

Abstract

Noninvasive measurement of pressure within the heart cavities and other internal organs (e.g., kidney, liver) has significant clinical value, but currently is not feasible. Noninvasive pressure estimation using encapsulated ultrasound (US) contrast agents (UCA) as sensors is a challenge because they supposedly respond to their ambient pressure, but they are more rigid and less sensitive to pressure than gas microbubbles. Here, Optison sensitivity was studied (f(resonance) = approximately 2 MHz) to varying pressures, when excited at 2 times and also at 0.5 times f(resonance). Cyclic momentary increases in ambient pressure of 0 to 5, 0 to 10, 0 to 15 or 0 to 20 kPa at 1.0 Hz, mimicking left ventricular (LV) pressure changes, caused amplitude decrease of echoes at 0.5, 1 and 2 times the transmitted frequency and decrease of attenuation. Changes at 0.5 times the transmitted frequency correlated best, but only after 70 to 150 s. The correlations (mean +/- SD) during 150 to 300 s were 0.706 +/- 0.072 for 0 to 10 kPa, 0.844 +/- 0.042 for 0 to 15 kPa and 0.859 +/- 0.031 for 0 to 20 kPa. Attenuation presented less correlation. For 1.0 Hz, 10 to 15 kPa or 15 to 20 kPa pressures, mimicking systemic pressures, the attenuation decayed fast and even faster for slow (0.05 Hz) cyclic varying pressures, or elevated steady-state pressures (of 10 kPa and 20 kPa). Thus, cyclic pressure effects on UCA are demonstrated to be reversible, but elevated static pressures cause UCA destruction. This allows cyclic pressure variations to be detected, using the subharmonics of the transmitted frequency, down to 10 kPa.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15866417     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  12 in total

1.  Excitation threshold for subharmonic generation from contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  Amit Katiyar; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Subharmonic aided pressure estimation for monitoring interstitial fluid pressure in tumours--in vitro and in vivo proof of concept.

Authors:  V G Halldorsdottir; J K Dave; J R Eisenbrey; P Machado; H Zhao; J B Liu; D A Merton; F Forsberg
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Modeling subharmonic response from contrast microbubbles as a function of ambient static pressure.

Authors:  Amit Katiyar; Kausik Sarkar; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of encapsulation damping on the excitation threshold for subharmonic generation from contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  Amit Katiyar; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Non-Invasive Intra-cardiac Pressure Measurements Using Subharmonic-Aided Pressure Estimation: Proof of Concept in Humans.

Authors:  Jaydev K Dave; Sushmita V Kulkarni; Purva P Pangaonkar; Maria Stanczak; Maureen E McDonald; Ira S Cohen; Praveen Mehrotra; Michael P Savage; Paul Walinsky; Nicholas J Ruggiero; David L Fischman; David Ogilby; Carolyn VanWhy; Matthew Lombardi; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Gauging the likelihood of stable cavitation from ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Chronic liver disease: noninvasive subharmonic aided pressure estimation of hepatic venous pressure gradient.

Authors:  John R Eisenbrey; Jaydev K Dave; Valgerdur G Halldorsdottir; Daniel A Merton; Cynthia Miller; José M Gonzalez; Priscilla Machado; Suhyun Park; Scott Dianis; Carl L Chalek; Christopher E Kim; Jeffrey P Baliff; Kai E Thomenius; Daniel B Brown; Victor Navarro; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  On the implementation of an automated acoustic output optimization algorithm for subharmonic aided pressure estimation.

Authors:  J K Dave; V G Halldorsdottir; J R Eisenbrey; D A Merton; J B Liu; P Machado; H Zhao; S Park; S Dianis; C L Chalek; K E Thomenius; D B Brown; F Forsberg
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 2.890

9.  Stability of echogenic liposomes as a blood pool ultrasound contrast agent in a physiologic flow phantom.

Authors:  Kirthi Radhakrishnan; Kevin J Haworth; Shao-Ling Huang; Melvin E Klegerman; David D McPherson; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Investigating the efficacy of subharmonic aided pressure estimation for portal vein pressures and portal hypertension monitoring.

Authors:  Jaydev K Dave; Valgerdur G Halldorsdottir; John R Eisenbrey; Daniel A Merton; Ji-Bin Liu; Jian-Hua Zhou; Hsin-Kai Wang; Suhyun Park; Scott Dianis; Carl L Chalek; Feng Lin; Kai E Thomenius; Daniel B Brown; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.