Literature DB >> 23145637

Effects of encapsulation damping on the excitation threshold for subharmonic generation from contrast microbubbles.

Amit Katiyar1, Kausik Sarkar.   

Abstract

A recent study [Katiyar and Sarkar (2011). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130, 3137-3147] showed that in contrast to the analytical result for free bubbles, the minimum threshold for subharmonic generation for contrast microbubbles does not necessarily occur at twice the resonance frequency. Here increased damping-either due to the small radius or the encapsulation-is shown to shift the minimum threshold away from twice the resonance frequency. Free bubbles as well as four models of the contrast agent encapsulation are investigated varying the surface dilatational viscosity. Encapsulation properties are determined using measured attenuation data for a commercial contrast agent. For sufficiently small damping, models predict two minima for the threshold curve-one at twice the resonance frequency being lower than the other at resonance frequency-in accord with the classical analytical result. However, increased damping damps the bubble response more at twice the resonance than at resonance, leading to a flattening of the threshold curve and a gradual shift of the absolute minimum from twice the resonance frequency toward the resonance frequency. The deviation from the classical result stems from the fact that the perturbation analysis employed to obtain it assumes small damping, not always applicable for contrast microbubbles.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23145637      PMCID: PMC3505217          DOI: 10.1121/1.4757099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  27 in total

1.  Pressure dependence of subharmonic signals from contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  W T Shi; F Forsberg; J S Raichlen; L Needleman; B B Goldberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Noninvasive estimation of dynamic pressures in vitro and in vivo using the subharmonic response from microbubbles.

Authors:  Jaydev K Dave; Valgerdur G Halldorsdottir; John R Eisenbrey; Ji-Bin Liu; Maureen E McDonald; Kris Dickie; Corina Leung; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Subharmonic behavior of phospholipid-coated ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.

Authors:  Jeroen Sijl; Benjamin Dollet; Marlies Overvelde; Valeria Garbin; Timo Rozendal; Nico de Jong; Detlef Lohse; Michel Versluis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  On the relationship between encapsulated ultrasound contrast agent and pressure.

Authors:  Dan Adam; Michal Sapunar; Elina Burla
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  On the suitability of broadband attenuation measurement for characterizing contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  Dhiman Chatterjee; Kausik Sarkar; Pankaj Jain; Nathan E Schreppler
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Microbubble spectroscopy of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Sander M van der Meer; Benjamin Dollet; Marco M Voormolen; Chien T Chin; Ayache Bouakaz; Nico de Jong; Michel Versluis; Detlef Lohse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  In vivo pressure estimation using subharmonic contrast microbubble signals: proof of concept.

Authors:  Flemming Forsberg; Ji-Bin Liu; William T Shi; Junji Furuse; Masafumi Shimizu; Barry B Goldberg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Nonspherical oscillations of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.

Authors:  Benjamin Dollet; Sander M van der Meer; Valeria Garbin; Nico de Jong; Detlef Lohse; Michel Versluis
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Modeling subharmonic response from contrast microbubbles as a function of ambient static pressure.

Authors:  Amit Katiyar; Kausik Sarkar; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Growth and dissolution of an encapsulated contrast microbubble: effects of encapsulation permeability.

Authors:  Kausik Sarkar; Amit Katiyar; Pankaj Jain
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  2 in total

1.  Encapsulated microbubbles and echogenic liposomes for contrast ultrasound imaging and targeted drug delivery.

Authors:  Shirshendu Paul; Rahul Nahire; Sanku Mallik; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  Comput Mech       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Determination of the interfacial rheological properties of a poly(DL-lactic acid)-encapsulated contrast agent using in vitro attenuation and scattering.

Authors:  Shirshendu Paul; Daniel Russakow; Tyler Rodgers; Kausik Sarkar; Michael Cochran; Margaret A Wheatley
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.998

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.