RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Although contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging techniques such as harmonic imaging (HI) have evolved to reduce tissue signals using the nonlinear properties of the contrast agent, levels of background suppression have been mixed. Subharmonic imaging (SHI) offers near complete tissue suppression by centering the receive bandwidth at half the transmitting frequency. The aims of this study were to demonstrate the feasibility of three-dimensional (3D) SHI and to compare it to 3D HI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional HI and SHI were implemented on a Logiq 9 ultrasound scanner with a 4D10L probe. Four-cycle SHI was implemented to transmit at 5.8 MHz and receive at 2.9 MHz, while two-cycle HI was implemented to transmit at 5 MHz and receive at 10 MHz. The ultrasound contrast agent Definity was imaged within a flow phantom and the lower pole of two canine kidneys in both HI and SHI modes. Contrast-to-tissue ratios and rendered images were compared offline. RESULTS: SHI resulted in significant improvement in contrast-to-tissue ratios relative to HI both in vitro (12.11 ± 0.52 vs 2.67 ± 0.77, P< .001) and in vivo (5.74 ± 1.92 vs 2.40 ± 0.48, P = .04). Rendered 3D subharmonic images provided better tissue suppression and a greater overall view of vessels in a flow phantom and canine renal vasculature. CONCLUSIONS: The successful implementation of SHI in 3D allows imaging of vascular networks over a heterogeneous sample volume and should improve future diagnostic accuracy. Additionally, 3D SHI provides improved contrast-to-tissue ratios relative to 3D HI.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Although contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging techniques such as harmonic imaging (HI) have evolved to reduce tissue signals using the nonlinear properties of the contrast agent, levels of background suppression have been mixed. Subharmonic imaging (SHI) offers near complete tissue suppression by centering the receive bandwidth at half the transmitting frequency. The aims of this study were to demonstrate the feasibility of three-dimensional (3D) SHI and to compare it to 3D HI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional HI and SHI were implemented on a Logiq 9 ultrasound scanner with a 4D10L probe. Four-cycle SHI was implemented to transmit at 5.8 MHz and receive at 2.9 MHz, while two-cycle HI was implemented to transmit at 5 MHz and receive at 10 MHz. The ultrasound contrast agent Definity was imaged within a flow phantom and the lower pole of two canine kidneys in both HI and SHI modes. Contrast-to-tissue ratios and rendered images were compared offline. RESULTS: SHI resulted in significant improvement in contrast-to-tissue ratios relative to HI both in vitro (12.11 ± 0.52 vs 2.67 ± 0.77, P< .001) and in vivo (5.74 ± 1.92 vs 2.40 ± 0.48, P = .04). Rendered 3D subharmonic images provided better tissue suppression and a greater overall view of vessels in a flow phantom and canine renal vasculature. CONCLUSIONS: The successful implementation of SHI in 3D allows imaging of vascular networks over a heterogeneous sample volume and should improve future diagnostic accuracy. Additionally, 3D SHI provides improved contrast-to-tissue ratios relative to 3D HI.
Authors: Flemming Forsberg; Ji-Bin Liu; William T Shi; Raymond Ro; Kathryn J Lipcan; Xuedong Deng; Anne L Hall Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: A Needles; D E Goertz; R Karshafian; E Cherin; A S Brown; P N Burns; F S Foster Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2008-03-06 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Flemming Forsberg; Catherine W Piccoli; Daniel A Merton; Juan J Palazzo; Anne L Hall Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-08-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: David E Goertz; Martijn E Frijlink; Dennie Tempel; Vijay Bhagwandas; Andries Gisolf; Robert Krams; Nico de Jong; Antonius F W van der Steen Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2007-08-02 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Anush Sridharan; John R Eisenbrey; Priscilla Machado; Haydee Ojeda-Fournier; Annina Wilkes; Alexander Sevrukov; Robert F Mattrey; Kirk Wallace; Carl L Chalek; Kai E Thomenius; Flemming Forsberg Journal: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 2.725
Authors: Anush Sridharan; John R Eisenbrey; Maria Stanczak; Priscilla Machado; Daniel A Merton; Annina Wilkes; Alexander Sevrukov; Haydee Ojeda-Fournier; Robert F Mattrey; Kirk Wallace; Flemming Forsberg Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Flemming Forsberg; Maria Stanczak; Andrej Lyshchik; David Loren; Patrick O'Kane; Ali Siddiqui; Thomas E Kowalski; Cynthia Miller; Traci Fox; Ji-Bin Liu; John R Eisenbrey Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2017-07-06 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Giselle A Suero-Abreu; Orlando Aristizábal; Benjamin B Bartelle; Eugenia Volkova; Joe J Rodríguez; Daniel H Turnbull Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 3.488