Literature DB >> 22087942

Excitation threshold for subharmonic generation from contrast microbubbles.

Amit Katiyar1, Kausik Sarkar.   

Abstract

Six models of contrast microbubbles are investigated to determine the excitation threshold for subharmonic generation. The models are applied to a commercial contrast agent; its characteristic parameters according to each model are determined using experimentally measured ultrasound attenuation. In contrast to the classical perturbative result, the minimum threshold for subharmonic generation is not always predicted at excitation with twice the resonance frequency; instead it occurs over a range of frequencies from resonance to twice the resonance frequency. The quantitative variation of the threshold with frequency depends on the model and the bubble radius. All models are transformed into a common interfacial rheological form, where the encapsulation is represented by two radius dependent surface properties-effective surface tension and surface dilatational viscosity. Variation of the effective surface tension with radius, specifically having an upper limit (resulting from strain softening or rupture of the encapsulation during expansion), plays a critical role. Without the upper limit, the predicted threshold is extremely large, especially near the resonance frequency. Having a lower limit on surface tension (e.g., zero surface tension in the buckled state) increases the threshold value at twice the resonance frequency, in some cases shifting the minimum threshold toward resonance.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22087942      PMCID: PMC3259666          DOI: 10.1121/1.3641455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  30 in total

1.  Destruction of contrast microbubbles and the association with inertial cavitation.

Authors:  W T Shi; F Forsberg; A Tornes; J Ostensen; B B Goldberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Pressure dependence of subharmonic signals from contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  W T Shi; F Forsberg; J S Raichlen; L Needleman; B B Goldberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  On the relationship between encapsulated ultrasound contrast agent and pressure.

Authors:  Dan Adam; Michal Sapunar; Elina Burla
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  On the suitability of broadband attenuation measurement for characterizing contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  Dhiman Chatterjee; Kausik Sarkar; Pankaj Jain; Nathan E Schreppler
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Microbubble spectroscopy of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Sander M van der Meer; Benjamin Dollet; Marco M Voormolen; Chien T Chin; Ayache Bouakaz; Nico de Jong; Michel Versluis; Detlef Lohse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Maxwell rheological model for lipid-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents.

Authors:  Alexander A Doinikov; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Ultrasonic contrast agent shell rupture detected by inertial cavitation and rebound signals.

Authors:  Azzdine Y Ammi; Robin O Cleveland; Jonathan Mamou; Grace I Wang; S Lori Bridal; William D O'Brien
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Modeling of nonlinear viscous stress in encapsulating shells of lipid-coated contrast agent microbubbles.

Authors:  Alexander A Doinikov; Jillian F Haac; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 2.890

9.  In vivo pressure estimation using subharmonic contrast microbubble signals: proof of concept.

Authors:  Flemming Forsberg; Ji-Bin Liu; William T Shi; Junji Furuse; Masafumi Shimizu; Barry B Goldberg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Growth and dissolution of an encapsulated contrast microbubble: effects of encapsulation permeability.

Authors:  Kausik Sarkar; Amit Katiyar; Pankaj Jain
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  14 in total

1.  Modifying the size distribution of microbubble contrast agents for high-frequency subharmonic imaging.

Authors:  Himanshu Shekhar; Joshua J Rychak; Marvin M Doyley
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Correlation of rupture dynamics to the nonlinear backscatter response from polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Sujeethraj Koppolu; Parag V Chitnis; Jonathan Mamou; John S Allen; Jeffrey A Ketterling
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Impulse response method for characterization of echogenic liposomes.

Authors:  Jason L Raymond; Ying Luan; Tom van Rooij; Klazina Kooiman; Shao-Ling Huang; David D McPherson; Michel Versluis; Nico de Jong; Christy K Holland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of encapsulation damping on the excitation threshold for subharmonic generation from contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  Amit Katiyar; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The response of phospholipid-encapsulated microbubbles to chirp-coded excitation: implications for high-frequency nonlinear imaging.

Authors:  Himanshu Shekhar; Marvin M Doyley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Relationship between cavitation and loss of echogenicity from ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Kirthi Radhakrishnan; Kenneth B Bader; Kevin J Haworth; Jonathan A Kopechek; Jason L Raymond; Shao-Ling Huang; David D McPherson; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Effects of droplet size and perfluorocarbon boiling point on the frequency dependence of acoustic vaporization threshold.

Authors:  Mitra Aliabouzar; Krishna N Kumar; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Encapsulated microbubbles and echogenic liposomes for contrast ultrasound imaging and targeted drug delivery.

Authors:  Shirshendu Paul; Rahul Nahire; Sanku Mallik; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  Comput Mech       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.014

9.  The delayed onset of subharmonic and ultraharmonic emissions from a phospholipid-shelled microbubble contrast agent.

Authors:  Himanshu Shekhar; Ivy Awuor; Keri Thomas; Joshua J Rychak; Marvin M Doyley
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Gauging the likelihood of stable cavitation from ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.