Literature DB >> 9651600

On the effect of lung filtering and cardiac pressure on the standard properties of ultrasound contrast agent.

A Bouakaz1, N de Jong, C Cachard, K Jouini.   

Abstract

The goal standard of contrast echocardiography is the absolute measure of myocardial perfusion using a contrast agent. Actually, several contrast agents are developed. All these agents show left ventricular opacification after intravenous injection. However, none of these agents shows an acceptable enhancement of the myocardium yet using conventional imaging techniques. The explanation of this phenomenon should be easy by measuring the acoustic characteristics of the contrast agent and then making a comparison of these characteristics with those of the myocardium. In this study we present definitions of standard acoustic parameters of ultrasound contrast agent, the backscatter coefficient Bs and the scattering-to-attenuation ratio STAR. Afterwards, considering an intravenous injection of the contrast agent, and taking into account the effects of lung filtering and cardiac pressure, the standard properties of contrast agents are determined in different sites: right ventricle (before lung passage), left ventricle (after lung passage and taking into account the pressure effect) and in the coronary system. Calculations showed that the acoustic properties are considerably influenced by these two effects: lung filtering and cardiac pressure. Comparison of these properties with the tissue properties (myocardium) is then performed. This determines the contribution of the contrast agent to the enhancement of the tissue visualization. The simulations are performed on Albunex microspheres. The results reveal that the difference between scattering of the myocardium and scattering of intravenously injected Albunex is too slight to be visible on an echographic image.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9651600     DOI: 10.1016/s0041-624x(97)00137-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  7 in total

1.  Modeling subharmonic response from contrast microbubbles as a function of ambient static pressure.

Authors:  Amit Katiyar; Kausik Sarkar; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Local drug and gene delivery through microbubbles and ultrasound.

Authors:  L J M Juffermans; P A Dijkmans; R J P Musters; A van Wamel; A Bouakaz; F J Ten Cate; L Deelman; C A Visser; N de Jong; O Kamp
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  Effect of microbubble size on fundamental mode high frequency ultrasound imaging in mice.

Authors:  Shashank Sirsi; Jameel Feshitan; James Kwan; Shunichi Homma; Mark Borden
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Acoustic characterization and pharmacokinetic analyses of new nanobubble ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Hanping Wu; Nicolas G Rognin; Tianyi M Krupka; Luis Solorio; Hiroki Yoshiara; Gilles Guenette; Christopher Sanders; Naohisa Kamiyama; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 5.  Diagnostic imaging advances in murine models of colitis.

Authors:  Markus Brückner; Philipp Lenz; Marcus M Mücke; Faekah Gohar; Peter Willeke; Dirk Domagk; Dominik Bettenworth
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Aptamer-crosslinked microbubbles: smart contrast agents for thrombin-activated ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Matthew A Nakatsuka; Robert F Mattrey; Sadik C Esener; Jennifer N Cha; Andrew P Goodwin
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 7.  Ultrasonic particles: An approach for targeted gene delivery.

Authors:  Aidan P G Walsh; Henry N Gordon; Karlheinz Peter; Xiaowei Wang
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 17.873

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.