Literature DB >> 20532138

Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using the ocular response analyzer.

Joo Young Shin1, Jin Seok Choi, Joo Youn Oh, Mee Kum Kim, Jin Hak Lee, Won Ryang Wee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate corneal biomechanical properties in eyes that had previously undergone penetrating keratoplasty (PK) using the ocular response analyzer (ORA).
METHODS: We recruited 26 patients who had received unilateral PK. Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), and cornea-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) were measured with the ORA and were compared to the measurements from the contralateral eyes that did not undergo PK.
RESULTS: The CH was 8.95+/-2.59 mmHg in eyes that underwent PK and 9.78+/-1.45 mmHg in the contralateral eyes that did not undergo PK (p=0.077). The CRF was 10.26+/-2.64 mmHg in post-PK eyes and 9.75+/-1.45 mmHg in the contralateral eyes (p=0.509), and the CH-CRF was significantly smaller in post-PK eyes (-1.31+/-2.32 mmHg in post-PK eyes vs. 0.03+/-0.88 mmHg in fellow eyes, p=0.016). The IOPg and IOPcc were significantly higher in the PK group than they were in the control group. The IOPcc's were 20.81+/-7.81 mmHg and 16.27+/-2.49 mmHg in post-PK and control eyes, respectively (p=0.011); and the IOPg's were 19.22+/-7.34 mmHg and 15.07+/-3.03 mmHg in post-PK and control eyes, respectively (p=0.019). The IOPcc-g's were 1.59+/-2.81 mmHg and 1.21+/-1.30 mmHg in post-PK and control eyes, respectively (p=0.412), and the central corneal thickness (CCT)'s were 489.11+/-90.60 microm and 556.24+/-42.84 microm in post-PK and control eyes, respectively (p=0.068).
CONCLUSIONS: Following PK, CH tended to decrease while CRF tended to increase, significantly decreasing CH-CRF. A significantly higher intraocular pressure and a thinner CCT following PK may have contributed to the observed changes in these corneal biomechanical parameters.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cornea; Intraocular pressure; Penetrating keratoplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20532138      PMCID: PMC2882075          DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2010.24.3.139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1011-8942


  14 in total

1.  Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer.

Authors:  David A Luce
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry.

Authors:  Jay S Pepose; Susan K Feigenbaum; Mujtaba A Qazi; Jeffrey P Sanderson; Cynthia J Roberts
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Dolores Ortiz; David Piñero; Mohamed H Shabayek; Francisco Arnalich-Montiel; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications.

Authors:  Javier Moreno-Montañés; Miguel J Maldonado; Noelia García; Loreto Mendiluce; Pio J García-Gómez; María Seguí-Gómez
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Sunil Shah; Mohammed Laiquzzaman; Rajan Bhojwani; Sanjay Mantry; Ian Cunliffe
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Ocular Response Analyzer in subjects with and without glaucoma.

Authors:  Michael Sullivan-Mee; Shavon C Billingsley; Amita D Patel; Kathy D Halverson; Brooks R Alldredge; Clifford Qualls
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry.

Authors:  David Touboul; Cynthia Roberts; Julien Kérautret; Caroline Garra; Sylvie Maurice-Tison; Elodie Saubusse; Joseph Colin
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Biomechanical properties of the cornea in Fuchs' corneal dystrophy.

Authors:  María A del Buey; José A Cristóbal; Francisco J Ascaso; Laura Lavilla; Elena Lanchares
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Corneal hysteresis, resistance factor, topography, and pachymetry after corneal lamellar flap.

Authors:  Damien Gatinel; Slim Chaabouni; Pierre-Alexandre Adam; Jacques Munck; Michel Puech; Thanh Hoang-Xuan
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  7 in total

1.  Corneal biomechanical properties in eyes with no previous surgery, with previous penetrating keratoplasty and with deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Authors:  Banu Torun Acar; Mehmet Orcun Akdemir; Suphi Acar
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-03       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Ocular biomechanical measurements on post-keratoplasty corneas using a Scheimpflug-based noncontact device.

Authors:  Laszlo Modis; Ziad Hassan; Eszter Szalai; Zsuzsanna Flaskó; Andras Berta; Gabor Nemeth
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Intra-Ocular Pressure Measurement in a Patient with a Thin, Thick or Abnormal Cornea.

Authors:  Colin I Clement; Douglas G A Parker; Ivan Goldberg
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2016-02-29

4.  Corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure assessment after penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic patients, long term results.

Authors:  Mohamed Samy Abd Elaziz; Hoda Mohamed Elsobky; Adel Galal Zaky; Eslam Ahmed Maher Hassan; Mahmoud Tawfik KhalafAllah
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 5.  Corneal biomechanical properties in different ocular conditions and new measurement techniques.

Authors:  Nery Garcia-Porta; Paulo Fernandes; Antonio Queiros; Jose Salgado-Borges; Manuel Parafita-Mato; Jose Manuel González-Méijome
Journal:  ISRN Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-04

6.  Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using ocular response analyzer.

Authors:  Vanathi Murugesan; Ravi Bypareddy; Mahesh Kumar; Dada Tanuj; Panda Anita
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Corneal Biomechanical Properties of Keratoconic Eyes Following Penetrating Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Hamidu Gobeka; Özlem Barut Selver; Melis Palamar Onay; Sait Eğrilmez; Ayşe Yağcı
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.