Literature DB >> 17188041

Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry.

Jay S Pepose1, Susan K Feigenbaum, Mujtaba A Qazi, Jeffrey P Sanderson, Cynthia J Roberts.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the preoperative and postoperative measurement of corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure (IOP) using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), the ocular response analyzer (ORA), and the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (PDCT) in eyes undergoing myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial.
METHODS: IOP was measured in 66 myopic eyes before and after LASIK by GAT, ORA, and PDCT in a randomized sequence. Metrics of corneal biomechanical properties (corneal hysteresis [CH], corneal resistance factor [CRF], and ocular pulse amplitude [OPA]) were recorded.
RESULTS: After LASIK, there was a reduction in mean corneal pachymetry of 90.2 mum and in IOP measurements with GAT (Delta = -1.8 +/- 2.8 mm Hg; P < .01), ORA-Goldmann (Delta = -4.6 +/- 2.8 mm Hg, P < .01), and ORA-corneal compensated (Delta - 2.1 +/- 2.6 mm Hg; P < .05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative IOP measurements taken by PDCT (Delta = -0.5 +/- 2.6 mm Hg). Postoperatively, CRF decreased by 28.6% (P < .01), CH by 16.2% (P < .01), and OPA by 1.8% (P = .32).
CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of IOP with PDCT appears to be relatively immune to changes in corneal biomechanics and pachymetry after LASIK, in comparison to GAT and ORA measures of IOP. PDCT and ORA both showed statistically lower variation in measurement than GAT. LASIK produced a marked decline in CH and CRF, which may reflect respective changes in the viscous and elastic qualities of the post-LASIK cornea. In contrast, there was no statistical change in OPA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17188041     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.09.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  75 in total

1.  Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using the ocular response analyzer.

Authors:  Joo Young Shin; Jin Seok Choi; Joo Youn Oh; Mee Kum Kim; Jin Hak Lee; Won Ryang Wee
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-06-05

2.  Brillouin optical microscopy for corneal biomechanics.

Authors:  Giuliano Scarcelli; Roberto Pineda; Seok Hyun Yun
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Mechanical interferometry imaging for creep modeling of the cornea.

Authors:  Lawrence Yoo; Jason Reed; James K Gimzewski; Joseph L Demer
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Comparison between Pascal dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after different types of refractive surgery.

Authors:  Antonios P Aristeidou; Georgios Labiris; Andreas Katsanos; Michalis Fanariotis; Nikitas C Foudoulakis; Vassilios P Kozobolis
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  [Influence of residual corneal bed thickness after myopic LASIK on intraocular pressure measurements. Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry].

Authors:  L Muller; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Corneal hysteresis in post-radial keratotomy primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Joshua S Hardin; Christopher I Lee; Lydia F Lane; Christian C Hester; R Grant Morshedi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  [Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on myopic regression after laser in situ keratomileusis].

Authors:  D Uthoff; K Hebestedt; G I W Duncker; E Spörl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Corneal biomechanical properties measured by the ocular response analyzer in acromegalic patients.

Authors:  Emine Sen; Yasemin Tutuncu; Melike Balikoglu-Yilmaz; Ufuk Elgin; Dilek Berker; Faruk Ozturk; Serdar Guler
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Clinical investigation of the effect of topical anesthesia on intraocular pressure.

Authors:  Turki M Almubrad; Kelechi C Ogbuehi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-09

10.  Differences between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry following Trabeculectomy.

Authors:  Efstathios T Detorakis; Emilia Grammenandi; Ioannis G Pallikaris; Miltiadis K Tsilimbaris
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.