Literature DB >> 19412648

Acetabular polyethylene wear and acetabular inclination and femoral offset.

Nick J Little1, Constant A Busch, John A Gallagher, Cecil H Rorabeck, Robert B Bourne.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Restoration of femoral offset and acetabular inclination may have an effect on polyethylene (PE) wear in THA. We therefore assessed the effect of femoral offset and acetabular inclination (angle) on acetabular conventional (not highly cross-linked) PE wear in uncemented THA. We prospectively followed 43 uncemented THAs for a minimum of 49 months (mean, 64 months; range, 49-88 months). Radiographs were assessed for femoral offset, acetabular inclination, and conventional PE wear. The mean (+/- standard deviation) linear wear rate in all THAs was 0.14 mm/year (+/- 0.01 mm/year) and the mean volumetric wear rate was 53.1 mm(3)/year (+/- 5.5 mm(3)/year). In THAs with an acetabular angle less than 45 degrees , the mean wear was 0.12 mm/year (+/- 0.01 mm/year) compared with 0.18 mm/year (+/- 0.02 mm/year) in those with a reconstructed acetabular angle greater than 45 degrees . Reproduction of a reconstructed femoral offset to within 5 mm of the native femoral offset was associated with a reduction in conventional PE wear (0.12 mm/year versus 0.16 mm/year). Careful placement of the acetabular component to ensure an acetabular angle less than 45 degrees in the reconstructed hip allows for reduced conventional PE wear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19412648      PMCID: PMC2758973          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0845-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  24 in total

1.  Determination of polyethylene wear in total hip replacements with use of digital radiographs.

Authors:  J M Martell; S Berdia
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Joint motion and surface contact area related to component position in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R P Robinson; P T Simonian; I M Gradisar; R P Ching
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-01

3.  Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component.

Authors:  J Livermore; D Ilstrup; B Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty in patient-matched groups. A comparison of stainless steel, cobalt chrome, and titanium-bearing surfaces.

Authors:  A B Bankston; P M Faris; E M Keating; M A Ritter
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Effects of acetabular abduction on cup wear rates in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Del Schutte; A J Lipman; S M Bannar; J T Livermore; D Ilstrup; B F Morrey
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Cementless acetabular fixation at fifteen years. A comparison with the same surgeon's results following acetabular fixation with cement.

Authors:  John L Gaffey; John J Callaghan; Douglas R Pedersen; Devon D Goetz; Patrick M Sullivan; Richard C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  A rat model of resorption of bone at the cement-bone interface in the presence of polyethylene wear particles.

Authors:  D W Howie; B Vernon-Roberts; R Oakeshott; B Manthey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  A B Bankston; H Cates; M A Ritter; E M Keating; P M Faris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Patient factors and wear in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas P Schmalzried; Olga L Huk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  79 in total

1.  The learning curve for adopting hip resurfacing among hip specialists.

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Jinjun Zhu; Peter J Brooks; C Anderson Engh; Stephen J Raterman; John S Rogerson; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty using the MAKO platform.

Authors:  Rupesh Tarwala; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-09

3.  Are leg length and hip offset comparable after hip resurfacing and cementless total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  S Patel; R R Thakrar; J Bhamra; F Hossain; M Tengrootenhuysen; F S Haddad
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Fluoroscopy assessment during anterior minimally invasive hip replacement is more accurate than with the posterior approach.

Authors:  Weifeng Ji; Nathaniel Stewart
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Using acetabular fossa as a guide for anticipated inclination of uncemented cup in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Junwei Li; Xu Gao; Guanghui Yang; Yanru Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-01-15

6.  Short stems reproduce femoral offset better than standard stems in total hip arthroplasty: a case-control study.

Authors:  Roger Erivan; Anne-Sophie Muller; Guillaume Villatte; Stéphane Millerioux; Aurélien Mulliez; Stéphane Boisgard; Stéphane Descamps
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Central X-ray beam correction of radiographic acetabular cup measurement after THA: an experimental study.

Authors:  T Schwarz; M Weber; M Wörner; T Renkawitz; J Grifka; B Craiovan
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 8.  Restoration of center of rotation and balance of THR.

Authors:  Zachary C Lum; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-09-06

9.  [More muscle mass in men: explanatory model for superior outcome after total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  B Preininger; K Schmorl; P von Roth; T Winkler; G Matziolis; C Perka; S Tohtz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Male gender, Charnley class C, and severity of bone defects predict the risk for aseptic loosening in the cup of ABG I hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jiri Gallo; Vitezslav Havranek; Jana Zapletalova; Jiri Lostak
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.