Literature DB >> 14960669

Cementless acetabular fixation at fifteen years. A comparison with the same surgeon's results following acetabular fixation with cement.

John L Gaffey1, John J Callaghan, Douglas R Pedersen, Devon D Goetz, Patrick M Sullivan, Richard C Johnston.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Loosening of the acetabular component is the major long-term problem associated with total hip arthroplasty with cement. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the minimum thirteen-year results associated with cementless acetabular components that had been inserted by a single surgeon and to compare them with the results associated with cemented acetabular components that had been inserted by the same surgeon.
METHODS: One hundred and twenty consecutive, nonselected primary total hip replacements were performed in 108 patients with use of a Harris-Galante-I cementless acetabular component and a cemented femoral component with a 28-mm head. The patients were evaluated clinically with use of a standard terminology questionnaire, and they were evaluated radiographically for loosening, component migration, wear, and osteolysis. The rates of revision for aseptic loosening and radiographic evidence of loosening for this cohort were compared with the rates for four previously reviewed consecutive series of hips in which the acetabular component had been inserted with cement. All patients were managed by the same surgeon, were followed for thirteen to fifteen years, and were evaluated with use of the same two criteria (revision and loosening) as the end points for Kaplan-Meier analysis.
RESULTS: Sixty-six patients (seventy-two hips) were living and forty-two patients (forty-eight hips) had died after thirteen to fifteen years of follow-up. No acetabular component had been revised because of aseptic loosening, and no acetabular component had migrated. With revision of the acetabular component for any reason as the end point, the survival rate was 81% +/- 8% at fifteen years. With revision of the acetabular component for clinical failure (osteolysis, wear, loosening, or dislocation) as the end point, the survival rate was 94% +/- 8% at fifteen years. Among the seventy hips with at least thirteen years of radiographic follow-up, five had pelvic osteolysis and three had had revision of a well-fixed acetabular component because of pelvic osteolysis secondary to polyethylene wear. The mean linear wear rate was 0.15 mm/yr (0.12 mm/yr when one outlier was excluded).
CONCLUSIONS: In terms of fixation, Harris-Galante-I cementless acetabular components performed better than did cemented 22-mm-inner-diameter Charnley acetabular components as well as 28-mm-inner-diameter all-polyethylene and metal-backed acetabular components that had been inserted by the same surgeon. However, the rate of wear was greater in association with the Harris-Galante-I cementless components than it was in association with the Charnley cemented all-polyethylene components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14960669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  22 in total

1.  A long-term follow-up study of the cementless THA with anatomic stem/HGPII cup with 22-mm head.

Authors:  Yutaka Nakoshi; Masahiro Hasegawa; Akihiro Sudo; Atsumasa Uchida
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Cementing acetabular liners into secure cementless shells for polyethylene wear provides durable mid-term fixation.

Authors:  John J Callaghan; David W Hennessy; Steve S Liu; Kirsten E Goetz; Anneliese D Heiner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Correlation between patient age at total hip replacement surgery and lifeexpectancy.

Authors:  Carlos Roberto Schwartsmann; Leandro de Freitas Spinelli; Leonardo Carbonera Boschin; Anthony Kerbes Yépez; Marcus Vinicius Crestani; Marcelo Faria Silva
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.513

Review 4.  Is there evidence for a superior method of socket fixation in hip arthroplasty? A systematic review.

Authors:  Dean Pakvis; Gijs van Hellemondt; Enrico de Visser; Wilco Jacobs; Maarten Spruit
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Surgical treatment options in patients with impaired bone quality.

Authors:  Norman A Johanson; Jody Litrenta; Jay M Zampini; Frederic Kleinbart; Haviva M Goldman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Is there evidence for accelerated polyethylene wear in uncemented compared to cemented acetabular components? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Hugo C van der Veen; Hans-Peter W van Jonbergen; Rudolf W Poolman; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Jos J A M van Raay
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Surgical Approaches to OA Therapy: Osteotomy and Arthroplasty.

Authors:  John J Callaghan
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-12-28

8.  Total hip replacement in developmental dysplasia using an oval-shaped cementless press-fit cup.

Authors:  Boris M Holzapfel; Felix Greimel; Peter M Prodinger; Hakan Pilge; Ulrich Nöth; Hans Gollwitzer; Maximilian Rudert
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  No differences in outcomes between cemented and uncemented acetabular components after 12-14 years: results from a randomized controlled trial comparing Duraloc with Charnley cups.

Authors:  Kristian Bjørgul; Wendy M Novicoff; S T Andersen; K Brevig; F Thu; M Wiig; O Ahlund
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-03-03

10.  Cementless total hip replacement: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Harumoto Yamada; Yasuo Yoshihara; Osamu Henmi; Mitsuhiro Morita; Yuichiro Shiromoto; Tomoki Kawano; Arihiko Kanaji; Kennichi Ando; Masato Nakagawa; Naoto Kosaki; Eiichi Fukaya
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 1.601

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.