Literature DB >> 21929917

Are leg length and hip offset comparable after hip resurfacing and cementless total hip arthroplasty?

S Patel1, R R Thakrar, J Bhamra, F Hossain, M Tengrootenhuysen, F S Haddad.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine if hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) and cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) were comparable in correcting leg length and hip offset in patients with primary osteoarthritis.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 80 patients who underwent either HRA or cementless THA for primary osteoarthritis (40 in each group) between 2006 and 2008. Standardised anteroposterior radiographs taken pre-operatively and at one year following surgery were used to calculate the total offset and leg length in both hips.
RESULTS: At one year following surgery, no leg length discrepancy was identified in either group. A difference of 0.39 cm (p=0.046) remained between the mean total offset of the operated hip and the contralateral non-operated hip in the HRA group. No difference in offset was observed between the two hips after surgery in the THA group (p=0.875).
CONCLUSIONS: Leg length is restored by HRA and THA. A difference remains in offset after HRA although we attribute this to intentional medialisation of the acetabular cup.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21929917      PMCID: PMC3369332          DOI: 10.1308/003588411X586731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  25 in total

1.  Results of a method of leg-length equalization for patients undergoing primary total hip replacement.

Authors:  S T Woolson; J M Hartford; A Sawyer
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mauricio Silva; Kee Haeng Lee; Christian Heisel; Mylene A Dela Rosa; Thomas P Schmalzried
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Relationship between radiographic measurements of reconstructed hip joint position and the Trendelenburg sign.

Authors:  Isao Asayama; Masatoshi Naito; Motoyuki Fujisawa; Taichi Kambe
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J M Loughead; D Chesney; J P Holland; A W McCaskie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-02

6.  Leg-length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Charles R Clark; Herbert D Huddleston; Eugene P Schoch; Bert J Thomas
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Removal of acetabular bone in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a comparison with hybrid total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J M Loughead; I Starks; D Chesney; J N S Matthews; A W McCaskie; J P Holland
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-01

8.  Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  B M Jolles; P Zangger; P-F Leyvraz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  A comparative joint simulator study of the wear of metal-on-metal and alternative material combinations in hip replacements.

Authors:  A A Goldsmith; D Dowson; G H Isaac; J G Lancaster
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.617

10.  Leg-length inequality and nerve palsy in total hip arthroplasty: a lawyer awaits!

Authors:  A A Hofmann; M C Skrzynski
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  1 in total

1.  Fluoroscopy and imageless navigation enable an equivalent reconstruction of leg length and global and femoral offset in THA.

Authors:  Markus Weber; Michael Woerner; Robert Springorum; Ernst Sendtner; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 4.176

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.