Literature DB >> 19235392

Experimental validation of a three-dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesis.

Bo Zhao1, Jun Zhou, Yue-Houng Hu, Thomas Mertelmeier, Jasmina Ludwig, Wei Zhao.   

Abstract

A three-dimensional (3D) linear model for digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) was developed to investigate the effects of different imaging system parameters on the reconstructed image quality. In the present work, experimental validation of the model was performed on a prototype DBT system equipped with an amorphous selenium (a-Se) digital mammography detector and filtered back-projection (FBP) reconstruction methods. The detector can be operated in either full resolution with 85 microm pixel size or 2 x 1 pixel binning mode to reduce acquisition time. Twenty-five projection images were acquired with a nominal angular range of +/- 20 degrees. The images were reconstructed using a slice thickness of 1 mm with 0.085 x 0.085 mm in-plane pixel dimension. The imaging performance was characterized by spatial frequency-dependent parameters including a 3D noise power spectrum (NPS) and in-plane modulation transfer function (MTF). Scatter-free uniform x-ray images were acquired at four different exposure levels for noise analysis. An aluminum (Al) edge phantom with 0.2 mm thickness was imaged to measure the in-plane presampling MTF. The measured in-plane MTF and 3D NPS were both in good agreement with the model. The dependence of DBT image quality on reconstruction filters was investigated. It was found that the slice thickness (ST) filter, a Hanning window to limit the high-frequency components in the slice thickness direction, reduces noise aliasing and improves 3D DQE. An ACR phantom was imaged to investigate the effects of angular range and detector operational modes on reconstructed image quality. It was found that increasing the angular range improves the MTF at low frequencies, resulting in better detection of large-area, low-contrast mass lesions in the phantom. There is a trade-off between noise and resolution for pixel binning and full resolution modes, and the choice of detector mode will depend on radiation dose and the targeted lesion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19235392      PMCID: PMC2673665          DOI: 10.1118/1.3040178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  18 in total

1.  Determination of the presampled MTF in computed tomography.

Authors:  J M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Conditioning data for calculation of the modulation transfer function.

Authors:  Andrew D A Maidment; Michael Albert
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Tao Wu; Richard H Moore; Elizabeth A Rafferty; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Optimization of slice sensitivity profile for radiographic tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Baojun Li; Gopal B Avinash; Jeffrey W Eberhard; Bernhard E H Claus
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Bo Zhao; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium digital mammography detector in a breast tomosynthesis system.

Authors:  Bo Zhao; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging.

Authors:  L T Niklason; B T Christian; L E Niklason; D B Kopans; D E Castleberry; B H Opsahl-Ong; C E Landberg; P J Slanetz; A A Giardino; R Moore; D Albagli; M C DeJule; P F Fitzgerald; D F Fobare; B W Giambattista; R F Kwasnick; J Liu; S J Lubowski; G E Possin; J F Richotte; C Y Wei; R F Wirth
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Tomographic mammography using a limited number of low-dose cone-beam projection images.

Authors:  Tao Wu; Alexander Stewart; Martin Stanton; Thomas McCauley; Walter Phillips; Daniel B Kopans; Richard H Moore; Jeffrey W Eberhard; Beale Opsahl-Ong; Loren Niklason; Mark B Williams
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Effects of undersampling on the proper interpretation of modulation transfer function, noise power spectra, and noise equivalent quanta of digital imaging systems.

Authors:  J T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Modulation transfer function of the EMI CT head scanner.

Authors:  C J Bischof; J C Ehrhardt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  26 in total

1.  Task-based modeling and optimization of a cone-beam CT scanner for musculoskeletal imaging.

Authors:  P Prakash; W Zbijewski; G J Gang; Y Ding; J W Stayman; J Yorkston; J A Carrino; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Task-based assessment of breast tomosynthesis: effect of acquisition parameters and quantum noise.

Authors:  I Reiser; R M Nishikawa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  [Digital breast tomosynthesis : technical principles, current clinical relevance and future perspectives].

Authors:  K Hellerhoff
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  [Physical aspects of different tomosynthesis systems].

Authors:  F Semturs; E Sturm; R Gruber; T H Helbich
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  A novel solid-angle tomosynthesis (SAT) scanning scheme.

Authors:  Jin Zhang; Cedric Yu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Gopal R Vijayaraghavan; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  A dual-view digital tomosynthesis imaging technique for improved chest imaging.

Authors:  Yuncheng Zhong; Chao-Jen Lai; Tianpeng Wang; Chris C Shaw
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Bo Zhao; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Oblique reconstructions in tomosynthesis. I. Linear systems theory.

Authors:  Raymond J Acciavatti; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  A statistical, task-based evaluation method for three-dimensional x-ray breast imaging systems using variable-background phantoms.

Authors:  Subok Park; Robert Jennings; Haimo Liu; Aldo Badano; Kyle Myers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.