Literature DB >> 7565348

Effects of undersampling on the proper interpretation of modulation transfer function, noise power spectra, and noise equivalent quanta of digital imaging systems.

J T Dobbins1.   

Abstract

The proper understanding of modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectra (NPS), and noise equivalent quanta (NEQ) in digital systems is significantly hampered when the systems are undersampled. Undersampling leads to three significant complications: (1) MTF and NPS do not behave as transfer amplitude and variance, respectively, of a single sinusoid, (2) the response of a digital system to a delta function is not spatially invariant and therefore does not fulfill certain technical requirements of classical analysis, and (3) NEQ loses its common meaning as maximum available SNR2 (signal-to-noise) at a particular frequency. These three complications cause the comparisons of MTF and NEQ between undersampled digital systems to depend on the frequency content of the images being evaluated. A tutorial of MTF, NPS, and NEQ concepts for digital systems is presented, along with a complete theoretical treatment of the above-mentioned complications from undersampling.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7565348     DOI: 10.1118/1.597600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  21 in total

1.  Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype.

Authors:  S Vedantham; A Karellas; S Suryanarayanan; D Albagli; S Han; E J Tkaczyk; C E Landberg; B Opsahl-Ong; P R Granfors; I Levis; C J D'Orsi; R E Hendrick
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Mammographic imaging with a small format CCD-based digital cassette: physical characteristics of a clinical system.

Authors:  S Vedantham; A Karellas; S Suryanarayanan; I Levis; M Sayag; R Kleehammer; R Heidsieck; C J D'Orsi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Comparison of visual grading analysis and determination of detective quantum efficiency for evaluating system performance in digital chest radiography.

Authors:  Patrik Sund; Magnus Båth; Susanne Kheddache; Lars Gunnar Månsson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Digital detectors for mammography: the technical challenges.

Authors:  A Noel; F Thibault
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-10-08       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Flat detectors and their clinical applications.

Authors:  Martin Spahn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-02       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Modeling and measurement of the detector presampling MTF of a variable resolution x-ray CT scanner.

Authors:  Roman Melnyk; Frank A DiBianca
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Information entropy measure for evaluation of image quality.

Authors:  Du-Yih Tsai; Yongbum Lee; Eri Matsuyama
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Assessment of detective quantum efficiency: intercomparison of a recently introduced international standard with prior methods.

Authors:  Nicole T Ranger; Ehsan Samei; James T Dobbins; Carl E Ravin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Experimental validation of a three-dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Bo Zhao; Jun Zhou; Yue-Houng Hu; Thomas Mertelmeier; Jasmina Ludwig; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Bo Zhao; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.