Literature DB >> 20945146

[Physical aspects of different tomosynthesis systems].

F Semturs1, E Sturm, R Gruber, T H Helbich.   

Abstract

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a new image processing technique based on digital mammography technology. Image slices of the stationary compressed breast are reconstructed from multiple images taken at different angles of the X-ray tube at the same time. The main goal is to achieve a similar radiation dose exposure as common encountered in traditional digital mammography. One of the key advantages of DBT is that lesions are less likely to be hidden amongst normal tissues as they are in traditional digital mammography. This way the quality of diagnosis can be improved, especially for dense breasts. Current DBT implementations from several manufacturers differ in certain features such as scanning angle, number of projections, scanning time, pixel size, reconstruction methods and type of tube movement. A comparison and description of these different characteristics as well as a discussion on the proposed number of imaging planes and related radiation dose requirements are given.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20945146     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-010-2012-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of linear and nonlinear tomosynthetic reconstruction methods in digital mammography.

Authors:  S Suryanarayanan; A Karellas; S Vedantham; S P Baker; S J Glick; C J D'Orsi; R L Webber
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 2.  [Current situation and future perspectives of digital mammography].

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; K-P Hermann; T Wacker; W Bautz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Experimental validation of a three-dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Bo Zhao; Jun Zhou; Yue-Houng Hu; Thomas Mertelmeier; Jasmina Ludwig; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Digital mammography: an update.

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; M Fuchsjäger; T Wacker; K-P Hermann
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging.

Authors:  L T Niklason; B T Christian; L E Niklason; D B Kopans; D E Castleberry; B H Opsahl-Ong; C E Landberg; P J Slanetz; A A Giardino; R Moore; D Albagli; M C DeJule; P F Fitzgerald; D F Fobare; B W Giambattista; R F Kwasnick; J Liu; S J Lubowski; G E Possin; J F Richotte; C Y Wei; R F Wirth
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  An infinite number of laminagrams from a finite number of radiographs.

Authors:  E R Miller; E M McCurry; B Hruska
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Computer-aided diagnosis in breast tomosynthesis and chest CT.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  2009-07-20

8.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography.

Authors:  Steven P Poplack; Tor D Tosteson; Christine A Kogel; Helene M Nagy
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study.

Authors:  Per Skaane; Solveig Hofvind; Arnulf Skjennald
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  So-called interval cancers of the breast. Pathologic and radiologic analysis of sixty-four cases.

Authors:  R Holland; M Mravunac; J H Hendriks; B V Bekker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Digital breast tomosynthesis].

Authors:  H Preibsch; K C Siegmann-Luz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Mammography: an update of the EUSOBI recommendations on information for women.

Authors:  Francesco Sardanelli; Eva M Fallenberg; Paola Clauser; Rubina M Trimboli; Julia Camps-Herrero; Thomas H Helbich; Gabor Forrai
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2016-11-16

3.  Free propagation phase-contrast breast CT provides higher image quality than cone-beam breast-CT at low radiation doses: a feasibility study on human mastectomies.

Authors:  S Pacilè; C Dullin; P Baran; M Tonutti; C Perske; U Fischer; J Albers; F Arfelli; D Dreossi; K Pavlov; A Maksimenko; S C Mayo; Y I Nesterets; S Tavakoli Taba; S Lewis; P C Brennan; T E Gureyev; G Tromba; S Wienbeck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.