Literature DB >> 18561674

Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium digital mammography detector in a breast tomosynthesis system.

Bo Zhao1, Wei Zhao.   

Abstract

In breast tomosynthesis a rapid sequence of N images is acquired when the x-ray tube sweeps through different angular views with respect to the breast. Since the total dose to the breast is kept the same as that in regular mammography, the exposure used for each image of tomosynthesis is 1/N. The low dose and high frame rate pose a tremendous challenge to the imaging performance of digital mammography detectors. The purpose of the present work is to investigate the detector performance in different operational modes designed for tomosynthesis acquisition, e.g., binning or full resolution readout, the range of view angles, and the number of views N. A prototype breast tomosynthesis system with a nominal angular range of +/-25 degrees was used in our investigation. The system was equipped with an amorphous selenium (a-Se) full field digital mammography detector with pixel size of 85 microm. The detector can be read out in full resolution or 2 x 1 binning (binning in the tube travel direction). The focal spot blur due to continuous tube travel was measured for different acquisition geometries, and it was found that pixel binning, instead of focal spot blur, dominates the detector modulation transfer function (MTF). The noise power spectrum (NPS) and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of the detector were measured with the exposure range of 0.4-6 mR, which is relevant to the low dose used in tomosynthesis. It was found that DQE at 0.4 mR is only 20% less than that at highest exposure for both detector readout modes. The detector temporal performance was categorized as lag and ghosting, both of which were measured as a function of x-ray exposure. The first frame lags were 8% and 4%, respectively, for binning and full resolution mode. Ghosting is negligible and independent of the frame rate. The results showed that the detector performance is x-ray quantum noise limited at the low exposures used in each view of tomosynthesis, and the temporal performance at high frame rate (up to 2 frames per second) is adequate for tomosynthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18561674      PMCID: PMC2673645          DOI: 10.1118/1.2903425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  25 in total

1.  Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: effects of image lag.

Authors:  J H Siewerdsen; D A Jaffray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential.

Authors:  James T Dobbins; Devon J Godfrey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Tao Wu; Richard H Moore; Elizabeth A Rafferty; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Resolution at oblique incidence angles of a flat panel imager for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  James G Mainprize; Aili K Bloomquist; Michael P Kempston; Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Signal and noise transfer properties of photoelectric interactions in diagnostic x-ray imaging detectors.

Authors:  G Hajdok; J Yao; J J Battista; I A Cunningham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Digital mammography: novel applications.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Rafferty
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography.

Authors:  H Fujita; D Y Tsai; T Itoh; K Doi; J Morishita; K Ueda; A Ohtsuka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: geometrical and effective fill factors.

Authors:  G Pang; W Zhao; J A Rowlands
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device.

Authors:  E Samei; M J Flynn; D A Reimann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging.

Authors:  L T Niklason; B T Christian; L E Niklason; D B Kopans; D E Castleberry; B H Opsahl-Ong; C E Landberg; P J Slanetz; A A Giardino; R Moore; D Albagli; M C DeJule; P F Fitzgerald; D F Fobare; B W Giambattista; R F Kwasnick; J Liu; S J Lubowski; G E Possin; J F Richotte; C Y Wei; R F Wirth
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  19 in total

1.  A novel approach to digital breast tomosynthesis for simultaneous acquisition of 2D and 3D images.

Authors:  Sara Vecchio; Achille Albanese; Paolo Vignoli; Angelo Taibi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Gopal R Vijayaraghavan; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Experimental validation of a three-dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Bo Zhao; Jun Zhou; Yue-Houng Hu; Thomas Mertelmeier; Jasmina Ludwig; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  The effect of angular dose distribution on the detection of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Yue-Houng Hu; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Characterization of a high-energy in-line phase contrast tomosynthesis prototype.

Authors:  Di Wu; Aimin Yan; Yuhua Li; Molly D Wong; Bin Zheng; Xizeng Wu; Hong Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Implementation and evaluation of an expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm for gamma emission breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Zongyi Gong; Kelly Klanian; Tushita Patel; Olivia Sullivan; Mark B Williams
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part I. The image acquisition process.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Toward Scintillator High-Gain Avalanche Rushing Photoconductor Active Matrix Flat Panel Imager (SHARP-AMFPI): Initial fabrication and characterization.

Authors:  James R Scheuermann; Adrian Howansky; Marc Hansroul; Sébastien Léveillé; Kenkichi Tanioka; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Optimization of configuration parameters in a newly developed digital breast tomosynthesis system.

Authors:  Hye-Suk Park; Ye-Seul Kim; Hee-Joung Kim; Young-Wook Choi; Jae-Gu Choi
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.