Literature DB >> 9356620

Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging.

L T Niklason1, B T Christian, L E Niklason, D B Kopans, D E Castleberry, B H Opsahl-Ong, C E Landberg, P J Slanetz, A A Giardino, R Moore, D Albagli, M C DeJule, P F Fitzgerald, D F Fobare, B W Giambattista, R F Kwasnick, J Liu, S J Lubowski, G E Possin, J F Richotte, C Y Wei, R F Wirth.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe and evaluate a method of tomosynthesis breast imaging with a full-field digital mammographic system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this tomosynthesis method, low-radiation-dose images were acquired as the x-ray source was moved in an arc above the stationary breast and digital detector. A step-and-expose method of imaging was used. Breast tomosynthesis and conventional images of two imaging phantoms and four mastectomy specimens were obtained. Three experienced readers scored the relative lesion visibility, lesion margin visibility, and confidence in the classification of six lesions.
RESULTS: Tomosynthesis image-reconstruction algorithms allow tomographic imaging of the entire breast from a single arc of the x-ray source and at a radiation dose comparable with that in single-view mammography. Except for images of a large mass in a fatty breast, the tomosynthesis images were superior to the conventional images.
CONCLUSION: Digital mammographic systems make breast tomosynthesis possible. Tomosynthesis may improve the specificity of mammography with improved lesion margin visibility and may improve early breast cancer detection, especially in women with radiographically dense breasts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9356620     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.205.2.9356620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  178 in total

1.  Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype.

Authors:  S Vedantham; A Karellas; S Suryanarayanan; D Albagli; S Han; E J Tkaczyk; C E Landberg; B Opsahl-Ong; P R Granfors; I Levis; C J D'Orsi; R E Hendrick
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A controlled evaluation of tuned-aperture computed tomography applied to digital spot mammography.

Authors:  R L Webber; H R Underhill; R I Freimanis
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Breast imaging using an amorphous silicon-based full-field digital mammographic system: stability of a clinical prototype.

Authors:  S Vedantham; A Karellas; S Suryanarayanan; C J D'Orsi; R E Hendrick
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Mammographic imaging with a small format CCD-based digital cassette: physical characteristics of a clinical system.

Authors:  S Vedantham; A Karellas; S Suryanarayanan; I Levis; M Sayag; R Kleehammer; R Heidsieck; C J D'Orsi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A software-based x-ray scatter correction method for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Steve Si Jia Feng; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A perceptual evaluation of JPEG 2000 image compression for digital mammography: contrast-detail characteristics.

Authors:  Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham; Sandra M Waldrop; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Combination of digital mammography with semi-automated 3D breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Ajay Kapur; Paul L Carson; Jeffrey Eberhard; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Kai Thomenius; Murtuza Lokhandwalla; Donald Buckley; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Mark A Helvie; Rebecca C Booi; Gerald L LeCarpentier; Ramon Q Erkamp; Heang-Ping Chan; J Brian Fowlkes; Jerry A Thomas; Cynthia E Landberg
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-08

8.  Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology, Specimen Radiography System (SRS) and Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Can Optimise Surgical Therapy?

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; G Dilbat; M Bani; P A Fasching; K Heusinger; M P Lux; C R Loehberg; B Brehm; M Hammon; M Saake; P Dankerl; S M Jud; C Rauh; C M Bayer; M W Beckmann; M Uder; M Meier-Meitinger
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 9.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Blood flow reduction in breast tissue due to mammographic compression.

Authors:  David R Busch; Regine Choe; Turgut Durduran; Daniel H Friedman; Wesley B Baker; Andrew D Maidment; Mark A Rosen; Mitchell D Schnall; Arjun G Yodh
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.