Literature DB >> 18545527

Estimating random signal parameters from noisy images with nuisance parameters: linear and scanning-linear methods.

Meredith Kathryn Whitaker1, Eric Clarkson, Harrison H Barrett.   

Abstract

In a pure estimation task, an object of interest is known to be present, and we wish to determine numerical values for parameters that describe the object. This paper compares the theoretical framework, implementation method, and performance of two estimation procedures. We examined the performance of these estimators for tasks such as estimating signal location, signal volume, signal amplitude, or any combination of these parameters. The signal is embedded in a random background to simulate the effect of nuisance parameters. First, we explore the classical Wiener estimator, which operates linearly on the data and minimizes the ensemble mean-squared error. The results of our performance tests indicate that the Wiener estimator can estimate amplitude and shape once a signal has been located, but is fundamentally unable to locate a signal regardless of the quality of the image. Given these new results on the fundamental limitations of Wiener estimation, we extend our methods to include more complex data processing. We introduce and evaluate a scanning-linear estimator that performs impressively for location estimation. The scanning action of the estimator refers to seeking a solution that maximizes a linear metric, thereby requiring a global-extremum search. The linear metric to be optimized can be derived as a special case of maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation when the likelihood is Gaussian and a slowly varying covariance approximation is made.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18545527      PMCID: PMC2577032          DOI: 10.1364/oe.16.008150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Opt Express        ISSN: 1094-4087            Impact factor:   3.894


  9 in total

1.  Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds.

Authors:  F O Bochud; J F Valley; F R Verdun; C Hessler; P Schnyder
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Ideal-observer computation in medical imaging with use of Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques.

Authors:  Matthew A Kupinski; John W Hoppin; Eric Clarkson; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Optimization of Ga-67 imaging for detection and estimation tasks: dependence of imaging performance on spectral acquisition parameters.

Authors:  Georges El Fakhri; Stephen C Moore; Marie Foley Kijewski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Maximum-likelihood estimation: a mathematical model for quantitation in nuclear medicine.

Authors:  S P Müller; M F Kijewski; S C Moore; B L Holman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Collimator optimization for detection and quantitation tasks: application to gallium-67 imaging.

Authors:  Stephen C Moore; Marie Foley Kijewski; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance.

Authors:  J P Rolland; H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Measures of performance in nonlinear estimation tasks: prediction of estimation performance at low signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Stefan P Müller; Craig K Abbey; Frank J Rybicki; Stephen C Moore; Marie Foley Kijewski
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Objective assessment of image quality. IV. Application to adaptive optics.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Kyle J Myers; Nicholas Devaney; Christopher Dainty
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability.

Authors:  H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.129

  9 in total
  17 in total

1.  Joint optimization of collimator and reconstruction parameters in SPECT imaging for lesion quantification.

Authors:  Sarah J McQuaid; Sudeepti Southekal; Marie Foley Kijewski; Stephen C Moore
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Task-based design of a synthetic-collimator SPECT system used for small animal imaging.

Authors:  Alexander Lin; Matthew A Kupinski; Todd E Peterson; Sepideh Shokouhi; Lindsay C Johnson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Task-based measures of image quality and their relation to radiation dose and patient risk.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Kyle J Myers; Christoph Hoeschen; Matthew A Kupinski; Mark P Little
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Assessment of cardiac single-photon emission computed tomography performance using a scanning linear observer.

Authors:  Chih-Jie Lee; Matthew A Kupinski; Lana Volokh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Optimization of an Adaptive SPECT System with the Scanning Linear Estimator.

Authors:  Nasrin Ghanbari; Eric Clarkson; Matthew Kupinski; Xin Li
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2017-06-13

6.  Design of a practical model-observer-based image quality assessment method for x-ray computed tomography imaging systems.

Authors:  Hsin-Wu Tseng; Jiahua Fan; Matthew A Kupinski
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-07-28

7.  Optimal channels for channelized quadratic estimators.

Authors:  Meredith K Kupinski; Eric Clarkson
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Task Equivalence for Model and Human-Observer Comparisons in SPECT Localization Studies.

Authors:  Anando Sen; Faraz Kalantari; Howard C Gifford
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 1.679

9.  Computational reader design and statistical performance evaluation of an in-silico imaging clinical trial comparing digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Rongping Zeng; Frank W Samuelson; Diksha Sharma; Andreu Badal; Graff G Christian; Stephen J Glick; Kyle J Myers; Aldo Badano
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-02-26

10.  Scanning linear estimation: improvements over region of interest (ROI) methods.

Authors:  Meredith K Kupinski; Eric W Clarkson; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.