Literature DB >> 25564960

Task-based measures of image quality and their relation to radiation dose and patient risk.

Harrison H Barrett1, Kyle J Myers, Christoph Hoeschen, Matthew A Kupinski, Mark P Little.   

Abstract

The theory of task-based assessment of image quality is reviewed in the context of imaging with ionizing radiation, and objective figures of merit (FOMs) for image quality are summarized. The variation of the FOMs with the task, the observer and especially with the mean number of photons recorded in the image is discussed. Then various standard methods for specifying radiation dose are reviewed and related to the mean number of photons in the image and hence to image quality. Current knowledge of the relation between local radiation dose and the risk of various adverse effects is summarized, and some graphical depictions of the tradeoffs between image quality and risk are introduced. Then various dose-reduction strategies are discussed in terms of their effect on task-based measures of image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25564960      PMCID: PMC4318357          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/2/R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  189 in total

1.  Effect of radiation dose and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on image quality of pulmonary computed tomography.

Authors:  Jiro Sato; Masaaki Akahane; Sachiko Inano; Mariko Terasaki; Hiroyuki Akai; Masaki Katsura; Izuru Matsuda; Akira Kunimatsu; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  A statistically defined anthropomorphic software breast phantom.

Authors:  Beverly A Lau; Ingrid Reiser; Robert M Nishikawa; Predrag R Bakic
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm: II. Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  D W Wilson; B M Tsui; H H Barrett
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Optimization of a tomosynthesis system for the detection of lung nodules.

Authors:  Angel R Pineda; Sungwon Yoon; David S Paik; Rebecca Fahrig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Estimation receiver operating characteristic curve and ideal observers for combined detection/estimation tasks.

Authors:  Eric Clarkson
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

Review 7.  New recommendations from the International Commission on Radiological Protection--a review.

Authors:  A D Wrixon
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Threshold for radiation-related severe mental retardation in prenatally exposed A-bomb survivors: a re-analysis.

Authors:  M Otake; W J Schull; S Lee
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.694

9.  Maximum-Likelihood Estimation With a Contracting-Grid Search Algorithm.

Authors:  Jacob Y Hesterman; Luca Caucci; Matthew A Kupinski; Harrison H Barrett; Lars R Furenlid
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 1.679

10.  Effect of noise correlation on detectability of disk signals in medical imaging.

Authors:  K J Myers; H H Barrett; M C Borgstrom; D D Patton; G W Seeley
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  33 in total

1.  Bayesian framework inspired no-reference region-of-interest quality measure for brain MRI images.

Authors:  Michael Osadebey; Marius Pedersen; Douglas Arnold; Katrina Wendel-Mitoraj
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-13

2.  Correlation between human detection accuracy and observer model-based image quality metrics in computed tomography.

Authors:  Justin Solomon; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-09-22

3.  Optimization of image quality and patient dose in radiographs of paediatric extremities using direct digital radiography.

Authors:  A Jones; C Ansell; C Jerrom; I D Honey
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Technical Note: Design and implementation of a high-throughput pipeline for reconstruction and quantitative analysis of CT image data.

Authors:  John Hoffman; Nastaran Emaminejad; Muhammad Wahi-Anwar; Grace H Kim; Matthew Brown; Stefano Young; Michael McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Predicting Detection Performance on Security X-Ray Images as a Function of Image Quality.

Authors:  Praful Gupta; Zeina Sinno; Jack L Glover; Nicholas G Paulter; Alan C Bovik
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 10.856

6.  RADIANCE AND PHOTON NOISE: Imaging in geometrical optics, physical optics, quantum optics and radiology.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Kyle J Myers; Luca Caucci
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-09-12

7.  Estimating ROI activity concentration with photon-processing and photon-counting SPECT imaging systems.

Authors:  Abhinav K Jha; Eric C Frey
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-04-13

8.  Estimating detectability index in vivo: development and validation of an automated methodology.

Authors:  Taylor Brunton Smith; Justin Solomon; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-12-11

9.  Task-Driven Optimization of Fluence Field and Regularization for Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction in Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Grace J Gang; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; J Webster Stayman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  CT reconstruction algorithms affect histogram and texture analysis: evidence for liver parenchyma, focal solid liver lesions, and renal cysts.

Authors:  Su Joa Ahn; Jung Hoon Kim; Sang Min Lee; Sang Joon Park; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.