UNLABELLED: We have compared the use of two (93 and 185 keV) and three (93, 185, and 300 keV) photopeaks for Ga-67 tumor imaging and optimized the placement of each energy window. METHODS: The bases for optimization and evaluation were ideal and Bayesian signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) for the detection of spheres embedded in a realistic anthropomorphic digital torso phantom and ideal SNR for the estimation of their size and activity concentration. Seven spheres of radii ranging from 1 to 3 cm, located at several sites in the torso, were simulated using a realistic Monte Carlo program. We also calculated the ideal SNR for the detection from simple phantom acquisitions. RESULTS: For detection and estimation tasks, the optimum windows were identical for all sphere sizes and locations. For the 93 keV photopeak, the optimal window was 84-102 keV for the detection and 87-102 keV for estimation; these windows are narrower than the 20% window often used in the clinic (83-101 keV). For the 185 keV photopeak, the optimal window was 170-220 keV for the detection and 170-215 keV for estimation; these are substantially different than the 15% window used in our clinic (171-199 keV). For the 300 keV photopeak, the optimal window for detection was 270-320 keV, and for estimation, 280-320 keV. Using the three optimized, rather than only the two lower-energy, windows yielded a 9% increase in the SNR for the detection of the 3 cm diam sphere (a 12% increase for a 2 cm diam sphere) and a 7% increase in the SNR for estimation of its size. For the acquired phantom data, detection also increased by 9%-12% when using three, rather than two, energy windows.
UNLABELLED: We have compared the use of two (93 and 185 keV) and three (93, 185, and 300 keV) photopeaks for Ga-67 tumor imaging and optimized the placement of each energy window. METHODS: The bases for optimization and evaluation were ideal and Bayesian signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) for the detection of spheres embedded in a realistic anthropomorphic digital torso phantom and ideal SNR for the estimation of their size and activity concentration. Seven spheres of radii ranging from 1 to 3 cm, located at several sites in the torso, were simulated using a realistic Monte Carlo program. We also calculated the ideal SNR for the detection from simple phantom acquisitions. RESULTS: For detection and estimation tasks, the optimum windows were identical for all sphere sizes and locations. For the 93 keV photopeak, the optimal window was 84-102 keV for the detection and 87-102 keV for estimation; these windows are narrower than the 20% window often used in the clinic (83-101 keV). For the 185 keV photopeak, the optimal window was 170-220 keV for the detection and 170-215 keV for estimation; these are substantially different than the 15% window used in our clinic (171-199 keV). For the 300 keV photopeak, the optimal window for detection was 270-320 keV, and for estimation, 280-320 keV. Using the three optimized, rather than only the two lower-energy, windows yielded a 9% increase in the SNR for the detection of the 3 cm diam sphere (a 12% increase for a 2 cm diam sphere) and a 7% increase in the SNR for estimation of its size. For the acquired phantom data, detection also increased by 9%-12% when using three, rather than two, energy windows.