Literature DB >> 12630829

Ideal-observer computation in medical imaging with use of Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques.

Matthew A Kupinski1, John W Hoppin, Eric Clarkson, Harrison H Barrett.   

Abstract

The ideal observer sets an upper limit on the performance of an observer on a detection or classification task. The performance of the ideal observer can be used to optimize hardware components of imaging systems and also to determine another observer's relative performance in comparison with the best possible observer. The ideal observer employs complete knowledge of the statistics of the imaging system, including the noise and object variability. Thus computing the ideal observer for images (large-dimensional vectors) is burdensome without severely restricting the randomness in the imaging system, e.g., assuming a flat object. We present a method for computing the ideal-observer test statistic and performance by using Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques when we have a well-characterized imaging system, knowledge of the noise statistics, and a stochastic object model. We demonstrate the method by comparing three different parallel-hole collimator imaging systems in simulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12630829      PMCID: PMC2464282          DOI: 10.1364/josaa.20.000430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  10 in total

1.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. III. Calculation of figures of merit for model observers in statistically nonstationary backgrounds.

Authors:  F O Bochud; C K Abbey; M P Eckstein
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 2.  Natural image statistics and neural representation.

Authors:  E P Simoncelli; B A Olshausen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  Basic principles of ROC analysis.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

4.  Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance.

Authors:  J P Rolland; H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Approximations to ideal-observer performance on signal-detection tasks.

Authors:  E Clarkson; H H Barrett
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2000-04-10       Impact factor: 1.980

6.  Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability.

Authors:  H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Objective assessment of image quality. III. ROC metrics, ideal observers, and likelihood-generating functions.

Authors:  H H Barrett; C K Abbey; E Clarkson
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data.

Authors:  C E Metz; B A Herman; J H Shen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability.

Authors:  C K Abbey; H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise.

Authors:  A E Burgess; F L Jacobson; P F Judy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.071

  10 in total
  41 in total

1.  Statistical Characterization of Radiological Images: Basic Principles and Recent Progress.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Kyle J Myers
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2007-01-01

2.  Experimental task-based optimization of a four-camera variable-pinhole small-animal SPECT system.

Authors:  Jacob Y Hesterman; Matthew A Kupinski; Lars R Furenlid; Donald W Wilson
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2005-02-12

3.  Noise propagation in resolution modeled PET imaging and its impact on detectability.

Authors:  Arman Rahmim; Jing Tang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Detection performance theory for ultrasound imaging systems.

Authors:  Roger J Zemp; Mark D Parry; Craig K Abbey; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Objective assessment of image quality. IV. Application to adaptive optics.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Kyle J Myers; Nicholas Devaney; Christopher Dainty
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Estimation receiver operating characteristic curve and ideal observers for combined detection/estimation tasks.

Authors:  Eric Clarkson
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Channelized-ideal observer using Laguerre-Gauss channels in detection tasks involving non-Gaussian distributed lumpy backgrounds and a Gaussian signal.

Authors:  Subok Park; Harrison H Barrett; Eric Clarkson; Matthew A Kupinski; Kyle J Myers
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  The multi-module, multi-resolution system (M3R): a novel small-animal SPECT system.

Authors:  Jacob Y Hesterman; Matthew A Kupinski; Lars R Furenlid; Donald W Wilson; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  A Task-Based Approach to Adaptive and Multimodality Imaging: Computation techniques are proposed for figures-of-merit to establish feasibility and optimize use of multiple imaging systems for disease diagnosis and treatment-monitoring.

Authors:  Eric Clarkson; Matthew A Kupinski; Harrison H Barrett; Lars Furenlid
Journal:  Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 10.961

10.  Toward realistic and practical ideal observer (IO) estimation for the optimization of medical imaging systems.

Authors:  Xin He; Brian S Caffo; Eric C Frey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 10.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.