Literature DB >> 2370589

Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability.

H H Barrett1.   

Abstract

A number of task-specific approaches to the assessment of image quality are treated. Both estimation and classification tasks are considered, but only linear estimators or classifiers are permitted. Performance on these tasks is limited by both quantum noise and object variability, and the effects of postprocessing or image-reconstruction algorithms are explicitly included. The results are expressed as signal-to-noise ratios (SNR's). The interrelationships among these SNR's are considered, and an SNR for a classification task is expressed as the SNR for a related estimation task times four factors. These factors show the effects of signal size and contrast, conspicuity of the signal, bias in the estimation task, and noise correlation. Ways of choosing and calculating appropriate SNR's for system evaluation and optimization are also discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2370589     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.7.001266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A        ISSN: 0740-3232            Impact factor:   2.129


  79 in total

1.  Maximum Likelihood Event Estimation and List-mode Image Reconstruction on GPU Hardware.

Authors:  Luca Caucci; Lars R Furenlid; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997)       Date:  2009-10-24

2.  Objective comparison of quantitative imaging modalities without the use of a gold standard.

Authors:  John W Hoppin; Matthew A Kupinski; George A Kastis; Eric Clarkson; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Experimental determination of object statistics from noisy images.

Authors:  Matthew A Kupinski; Eric Clarkson; John W Hoppin; Liying Chen; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Ideal-observer computation in medical imaging with use of Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques.

Authors:  Matthew A Kupinski; John W Hoppin; Eric Clarkson; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Linear system models for ultrasonic imaging: application to signal statistics.

Authors:  Roger J Zemp; Craig K Abbey; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Noise characteristics of heterodyne/homodyne frequency-domain measurements.

Authors:  Dongyel Kang; Matthew A Kupinski
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  Task-based modeling and optimization of a cone-beam CT scanner for musculoskeletal imaging.

Authors:  P Prakash; W Zbijewski; G J Gang; Y Ding; J W Stayman; J Yorkston; J A Carrino; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Beyond noise power in 3D computed tomography: the local NPS and off-diagonal elements of the Fourier domain covariance matrix.

Authors:  Angel R Pineda; Daniel J Tward; Antonio Gonzalez; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Anatomical background and generalized detectability in tomosynthesis and cone-beam CT.

Authors:  G J Gang; D J Tward; J Lee; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Evaluation of Noise Properties in PSF-Based PET Image Reconstruction.

Authors:  Shan Tong; Adam M Alessio; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997)       Date:  2009-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.