Literature DB >> 27409452

Optimal channels for channelized quadratic estimators.

Meredith K Kupinski, Eric Clarkson.   

Abstract

We present a new method for computing optimized channels for estimation tasks that is feasible for high-dimensional image data. Maximum-likelihood (ML) parameter estimates are challenging to compute from high-dimensional likelihoods. The dimensionality reduction from M measurements to L channels is a critical advantage of channelized quadratic estimators (CQEs), since estimating likelihood moments from channelized data requires smaller sample sizes and inverting a smaller covariance matrix is easier. The channelized likelihood is then used to form ML estimates of the parameter(s). In this work we choose an imaging example in which the second-order statistics of the image data depend upon the parameter of interest: the correlation length. Correlation lengths are used to approximate background textures in many imaging applications, and in these cases an estimate of the correlation length is useful for pre-whitening. In a simulation study we compare the estimation performance, as measured by the root-mean-squared error (RMSE), of correlation length estimates from CQE and power spectral density (PSD) distribution fitting. To abide by the assumptions of the PSD method we simulate an ergodic, isotropic, stationary, and zero-mean random process. These assumptions are not part of the CQE formalism. The CQE method assumes a Gaussian channelized likelihood that can be a valid for non-Gaussian image data, since the channel outputs are formed from weighted sums of the image elements. We have shown that, for three or more channels, the RMSE of CQE estimates of correlation length is lower than conventional PSD estimates. We also show that computing CQE by using a standard nonlinear optimization method produces channels that yield RMSE within 2% of the analytic optimum. CQE estimates of anisotropic correlation length estimation are reported to demonstrate this technique on a two-parameter estimation problem.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27409452      PMCID: PMC8123080          DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.33.001214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  15 in total

1.  Optimisation of T2 and M0 measurements of bi-exponential systems.

Authors:  Anastasios Anastasiou; L D Hall
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Multispectral principal component imaging.

Authors:  Himadri Pal; Mark Neifeld
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2003-09-08       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Singular vectors of a linear imaging system as efficient channels for the bayesian ideal observer.

Authors:  Subok Park; Joel M Witten; Kyle J Myers
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Optimal experimental design for diffusion kurtosis imaging.

Authors:  Dirk H J Poot; Arnold J den Dekker; Eric Achten; Marleen Verhoye; Jan Sijbers
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model.

Authors:  K J Myers; H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Model observers for assessment of image quality.

Authors:  H H Barrett; J Yao; J P Rolland; K J Myers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Adaptive Angular Sampling for SPECT Imaging.

Authors:  Nan Li; Ling-Jian Meng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 1.679

8.  Scanning linear estimation: improvements over region of interest (ROI) methods.

Authors:  Meredith K Kupinski; Eric W Clarkson; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Fast, single-molecule localization that achieves theoretically minimum uncertainty.

Authors:  Carlas S Smith; Nikolai Joseph; Bernd Rieger; Keith A Lidke
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-04-04       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Comparison of the scanning linear estimator (SLE) and ROI methods for quantitative SPECT imaging.

Authors:  Arda Könik; Meredith Kupinski; P Hendrik Pretorius; Michael A King; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.