Literature DB >> 32118094

Computational reader design and statistical performance evaluation of an in-silico imaging clinical trial comparing digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammography.

Rongping Zeng1, Frank W Samuelson1, Diksha Sharma1, Andreu Badal1, Graff G Christian1, Stephen J Glick1, Kyle J Myers1, Aldo Badano1.   

Abstract

A recent study reported on an in-silico imaging trial that evaluated the performance of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) as a replacement for full-field digital mammography (FFDM) for breast cancer screening. In this in-silico trial, the whole imaging chain was simulated, including the breast phantom generation, the x-ray transport process, and computational readers for image interpretation. We focus on the design and performance characteristics of the computational reader in the above-mentioned trial. Location-known lesion (spiculated mass and clustered microcalcifications) detection tasks were used to evaluate the imaging system performance. The computational readers were designed based on the mechanism of a channelized Hotelling observer (CHO), and the reader models were selected to trend human performance. Parameters were tuned to ensure stable lesion detectability. A convolutional CHO that can adapt a round channel function to irregular lesion shapes was compared with the original CHO and was found to be suitable for detecting clustered microcalcifications but was less optimal in detecting spiculated masses. A three-dimensional CHO that operated on the multiple slices was compared with a two-dimensional (2-D) CHO that operated on three versions of 2-D slabs converted from the multiple slices and was found to be optimal in detecting lesions in DBT. Multireader multicase reader output analysis was used to analyze the performance difference between FFDM and DBT for various breast and lesion types. The results showed that DBT was more beneficial in detecting masses than detecting clustered microcalcifications compared with FFDM, consistent with the finding in a clinical imaging trial. Statistical uncertainty smaller than 0.01 standard error for the estimated performance differences was achieved with a dataset containing approximately 3000 breast phantoms. The computational reader design methodology presented provides evidence that model observers can be useful in-silico tools for supporting the performance comparison of breast imaging systems.
© 2020 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Entities:  

Keywords:  channelized hoteling model observer; computational reader; digital breast tomosynthesis; model observer; task-based performance assessment; virtual clinical trial

Year:  2020        PMID: 32118094      PMCID: PMC7043285          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.7.4.042802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  28 in total

1.  Validating the use of channels to estimate the ideal linear observer.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Task-based assessment of breast tomosynthesis: effect of acquisition parameters and quantum noise.

Authors:  I Reiser; R M Nishikawa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Automated computer evaluation and optimization of image compression of x-ray coronary angiograms for signal known exactly detection tasks.

Authors:  Miguel Eckstein; Jay Bartroff; Craig Abbey; James Whiting; Francois Bochud
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2003-03-10       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Estimating random signal parameters from noisy images with nuisance parameters: linear and scanning-linear methods.

Authors:  Meredith Kathryn Whitaker; Eric Clarkson; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2008-05-26       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  A performance comparison of anthropomorphic model observers for breast cone beam CT images: A single-slice and multislice study.

Authors:  Minah Han; Jongduk Baek
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-30       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study.

Authors:  David Gur; Gordon S Abrams; Denise M Chough; Marie A Ganott; Christiane M Hakim; Ronald L Perrin; Grace Y Rathfon; Jules H Sumkin; Margarita L Zuley; Andriy I Bandos
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Discovering intrinsic properties of human observers' visual search and mathematical observers' scanning.

Authors:  Xin He; Frank Samuelson; Rongping Zeng; Berkman Sahiner
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Technical Note: In silico imaging tools from the VICTRE clinical trial.

Authors:  Diksha Sharma; Christian G Graff; Andreu Badal; Rongping Zeng; Purva Sawant; Aunnasha Sengupta; Eshan Dahal; Aldo Badano
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Visual-search observers for assessing tomographic x-ray image quality.

Authors:  Howard C Gifford; Zhihua Liang; Mini Das
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Correlation between model observer and human observer performance in CT imaging when lesion location is uncertain.

Authors:  Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Yi Zhang; Rickey Carter; Alicia Y Toledano; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  2 in total

1.  In silico imaging clinical trials: cheaper, faster, better, safer, and more scalable.

Authors:  Aldo Badano
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 2.279

2.  Automatic Classification of Simulated Breast Tomosynthesis Whole Images for the Presence of Microcalcification Clusters Using Deep CNNs.

Authors:  Ana M Mota; Matthew J Clarkson; Pedro Almeida; Nuno Matela
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-08-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.