Literature DB >> 17106464

Objective assessment of image quality. IV. Application to adaptive optics.

Harrison H Barrett1, Kyle J Myers, Nicholas Devaney, Christopher Dainty.   

Abstract

The methodology of objective assessment, which defines image quality in terms of the performance of specific observers on specific tasks of interest, is extended to temporal sequences of images with random point spread functions and applied to adaptive imaging in astronomy. The tasks considered include both detection and estimation, and the observers are the optimal linear discriminant (Hotelling observer) and the optimal linear estimator (Wiener). A general theory of first- and second-order spatiotemporal statistics in adaptive optics is developed. It is shown that the covariance matrix can be rigorously decomposed into three terms representing the effect of measurement noise, random point spread function, and random nature of the astronomical scene. Figures of merit are developed, and computational methods are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17106464      PMCID: PMC2596685          DOI: 10.1364/josaa.23.003080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  18 in total

1.  Detection of Planetary Transits Across a Sun-like Star.

Authors: 
Journal:  Astrophys J       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 5.874

2.  Point target detection and subpixel position estimation in optical imagery.

Authors:  Vincent Samson; Frédéric Champagnat; Jean-François Giovannelli
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2004-01-10       Impact factor: 1.980

3.  Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance.

Authors:  J P Rolland; H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Decision strategies that maximize the area under the LROC curve.

Authors:  Parmeshwar Khurd; Gene Gindi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Maximum-likelihood methods in wavefront sensing: stochastic models and likelihood functions.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Christopher Dainty; David Lara
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Channelized detection filters.

Authors:  R N Strickland; D A Hutton
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 3.776

7.  Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability.

Authors:  H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Efficiency of the human observer detecting random signals in random backgrounds.

Authors:  Subok Park; Eric Clarkson; Matthew A Kupinski; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability.

Authors:  C K Abbey; H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Hotelling trace criterion and its correlation with human-observer performance.

Authors:  R D Fiete; H H Barrett; W E Smith; K J Myers
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  17 in total

1.  Statistical Characterization of Radiological Images: Basic Principles and Recent Progress.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Kyle J Myers
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2007-01-01

2.  Maximum-likelihood methods in wavefront sensing: stochastic models and likelihood functions.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Christopher Dainty; David Lara
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  A Vector Uniform Cramer-Rao Bound for SPECT System Design.

Authors:  Ling-Jian Meng; Nan Li
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 1.679

4.  Adaptive SPECT.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Lars R Furenlid; Melanie Freed; Jacob Y Hesterman; Matthew A Kupinski; Eric Clarkson; Meredith K Whitaker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Estimating random signal parameters from noisy images with nuisance parameters: linear and scanning-linear methods.

Authors:  Meredith Kathryn Whitaker; Eric Clarkson; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2008-05-26       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Objective assessment of image quality VI: imaging in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Matthew A Kupinski; Stefan Müeller; Howard J Halpern; John C Morris; Roisin Dwyer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Task Performance in Astronomical Adaptive Optics.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Kyle J Myers; Nicholas Devaney; J C Dainty; Luca Caucci
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2006-01-01

Review 8.  Task-based measures of image quality and their relation to radiation dose and patient risk.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Kyle J Myers; Christoph Hoeschen; Matthew A Kupinski; Mark P Little
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Optimization of an Adaptive SPECT System with the Scanning Linear Estimator.

Authors:  Nasrin Ghanbari; Eric Clarkson; Matthew Kupinski; Xin Li
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2017-06-13

10.  Approximating the Ideal Observer for Joint Signal Detection and Localization Tasks by use of Supervised Learning Methods.

Authors:  Weimin Zhou; Hua Li; Mark A Anastasio
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 10.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.